direct red 81
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

32
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivani Amin ◽  
Rajesh Prasad Rastogi ◽  
Mukesh Ghanshyam Chaubey ◽  
Kunal Jain ◽  
Jyoti Divecha ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 2037-2046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abaranjitha Muniyasamy ◽  
Gayathri Sivaporul ◽  
Abarna Gopinath ◽  
Juliana John ◽  
Anant Achary ◽  
...  

Abstract In the present work, the degradation of Direct Red 81 by ozonation was studied. The interactive effects of the influencing factors (dye concentration = 500–2,000 mg/L; time = 10–30 min; pH = 7.0–11.0) on degradation efficiency was critically examined through experimental design optimization by central composite design under the response surface methodology. The high correlation coefficients (R2 = 0.976 & adjusted R2 = 0.958) obtained by analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated close fit between the experimental and the predicted values. Optimized conditions under specified cost-driven restraints were obtained for the highest desirability (i.e. degradation of 1,210.59 mg/L dye) at pH = 11.0, initial dye concentration = 2,000 mg/L and ozone exposure time of 27.16 min. The degradation of Direct Red 81 was confirmed through Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis and UV-Vis spectrometry.


2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 2028-2039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Cu ◽  
Ruchi Bansal ◽  
Samir Mitragotri ◽  
David Fernandez Rivas

Abstract Drug diffusion within the skin with a needle-free micro-jet injection (NFI) device was compared with two well-established delivery methods: topical application and solid needle injection. A permanent make-up (PMU) machine, normally used for dermal pigmentation, was utilized as a solid needle injection method. For NFIs a continuous wave (CW) laser diode was used to create a bubble inside a microfluidic device containing a light absorbing solution. Each method delivered two different solutions into ex vivo porcine skin. The first solution consisted of a red dye (direct red 81) and rhodamine B in water. The second solution was direct red 81 and rhodamine B in water and glycerol. We measured the diffusion depth, width and surface area of the solutions in all the injected skin samples. The NFI has a higher vertical dispersion velocity of 3 × 105μm/s compared to topical (0.1 μm/s) and needle injection (53 μm/s). The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed, and we conclude that the micro-jet injector represents a fast and minimally invasive injection method, while the solid needle injector causes notable tissue damage. In contrast, the topical method had the slowest diffusion rate but causes no visible damage to the skin.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Cu ◽  
Ruchi Bansal ◽  
Samir Mitragotri ◽  
David Fernandez Rivas

AbstractDrug diffusion within the skin with a needle-free micro-jet injection (NFI) device was compared with two well-established delivery methods: topical application and solid needle injection. A permanent make-up (PMU) machine, normally used for dermal pigmentation, was utilized as a solid needle injection method. For NFIs a continuous wave (CW) laser diode was used to create a bubble inside a microfluidic device containing a light absorbing solution. Each method delivered two different solutions intoex-vivoporcine skin. The first solution consisted of a red dye (direct red 81) and rhodamine B in water. The second solution was direct red 81 and rhodamine B in water and glycerol. For PMU experiments, the skin samples were kept stationary and the diffusion depth, width and surface area were measured. The NFI has a higher vertical dispersion velocity of 3 × 105μm/s compared to topical (0.1 μm/s) and needle injection (53μm/s). The limitations and advantages of each method are discussed, and we conclude that the micro-jet injector represents a fast and minimally invasive injection method, while the solid needle injector causes notably tissue damage. In contrast, the topical method had the slowest diffusion rate but causes no visible damage to the skin.


Author(s):  
Sk. Md. Atiqur Rahman ◽  
Ananda Kumar Saha ◽  
Rokshana Ara Ruhi ◽  
Md. Fazlul Haque ◽  
Moni Krishno Mohanta

Data in Brief ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Kamani ◽  
Gholam Hossein Safari ◽  
Ghorban Asgari ◽  
Seyed Davoud Ashrafi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document