Frequent FGFR1 hotspot alterations in driver-unknown low-grade glioma and mixed neuronal-glial tumors

Purpose Low-grade gliomas (LGG) and mixed neuronal-glial tumors (MNGT) show frequent MAPK pathway alterations. Oncogenic fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) tyrosinase kinase domain has been reported in brain tumors of various histologies. We sought to determine the frequency of FGFR1 hotspot mutations N546 and K656 in driver-unknown LGG/MNGT and examined FGFR1 immunohistochemistry as a potential tool to detect those alterations. Methods We analyzed 476 LGG/MNGT tumors for KIAA-1549-BRAF fusion, IDH1/2, TERT promotor, NF1, H3F3A and the remaining cases for FGFR1 mutation frequency and correlated FGFR1 immunohistochemistry in 106 cases. Results 368 of 476 LGG/MNGT tumors contained non-FGFR1 alterations. We identified 9 FGFR1 p.N546K and 4 FGFR1 p.K656E mutations among the 108 remaining driver-unknown samples. Five tumors were classified as dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), 4 as pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) and 3 as rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor (RGNT). FGFR1 mutations were associated with oligodendroglia-like cells, but not with age or tumor location. FGFR1 immunohistochemical expression was observed in 92 cases. FGFR1 immunoreactivity score was higher in PA and DNT compared to diffuse astrocytoma, but no correlation between FGFR1 mutation in tumors and FGFR1 expression level was observed. Conclusion FGFR1 hotspot mutations are the fifth most prevailing alteration in LGG/MNGT. Performing FGFR1 sequencing analysis in driver-unknown low-grade brain tumors could yield up to 12% FGFR1 N546/K656 mutant cases.

LGG-06. COMPREHENSIVE GENOMIC CHARACTERIZATION AND INTEGRATED CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF LOW-GRADE GLIOMAS IN CHILDREN WITH NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1

Background Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) arising in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are usually not biopsied. To identify secondary genetic alterations or molecular features that may contribute to pathogenesis and correlate with clinical behavior, we initiated a comprehensive molecular and clinical analysis of pediatric NF1-LGGs. Methods NF1-LGGs were analysed by whole-genome sequencing (31), targeted gene panel sequencing (9), RNAseq transcriptomal profiling (33) and genome-wide DNA methylation analysis (67). Clinical annotation was available for 48 subjects. Results Most LGGs harbored bi-allelic NF1 inactivation as the sole genetic abnormality, but 11% had additional alterations (FGFR1 mutation, n=3; PIK3CA mutation, n=2; homozygous 9p21 deletion, n=2; MYB:QKI fusion, n=1; SETD2 mutation, n=1; EGFR amplification, n=1). FGFR1 mutation conferred additional growth advantage in multiple complementary murine Nf1 models. 88% of NF1-LGGs resembled sporadic pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) by methylation, higher than that based on histology. Non-PA methylation patterns included low-grade glial/glioneuronal tumors, rosette-forming glioneuronal tumors, MYB/MYBL1-altered glioma, and high-grade astrocytoma with piloid features (2 tumors histologically diagnosed as LGG). In total, 18% of samples were classified as non-PA and/or harbored an additional non-NF1 mutation. Non-PA methylation class tumors were more likely to harbor an additional non-NF1 mutation (p=0.005). 7.7% of optic pathway hypothalamic gliomas (OPHGs) had other mutations or were not classified by methylation as PA, compared with 20.6% of NF1-LGGs arising elsewhere. There was no difference based on age for the presence of an additional non-NF1 mutation or non-PA methylation class. Conclusions Given the overall low occurrence of non-NF1 mutations or non-PA methylation class tumors in this series, routine clinical biopsy of typically-appearing NF1-LGG may not be indicated, particularly for children with OPHG. Biopsy should be considered for non-OPHG tumors refractory to conventional treatment. As additional agents are developed and treatment strategies evolve, the rationale for biopsy of NF1-LGG may become stronger.

Clinical Characteristics and Spermatogenesis in Patients with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Caused by FGFR1 Mutations

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) caused by FGFR1 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 1) gene mutations and to evaluate the effect of gonadotropin or pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy on spermatogenesis. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on CHH patients admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from January 2012 to March 2020. Clinical features and laboratory results were recorded. Testicular volume and sperm count responding to gonadotropin and pulsatile GnRH therapy were compared between the FGFR1 mutation group and the mutation-negative group. Results. (1) FGFR1 mutation group included 14 patients who received sperm-induction therapy, and the mutation-negative group enrolled 25 CHH patients. (2) The incidence of cryptorchidism was 50.0% (7/14) and 12.0% (3/25) in the FGFR1 group and the mutation-negative group, respectively ( p = 0.019 ). The baseline testicular volume of the FGFR1 mutation group was smaller than that of the mutation-negative group, 1.6 (0.5–2.0) mL vs. 2 (1.75–4) mL ( p = 0.033 ). The baseline luteinizing hormone (LH), Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone levels were similar between the two groups. (3) Using the Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests for the analysis of spermatogenesis, it was found that there was no significant difference in the first sperm appearance between the FGFR1 mutation group and the mutation-negative group (χ2 = 1.974, p = 0.160 ). The median time of spermatogenesis in the FGFR1 mutation group was longer than that in the mutation-negative group, 16 months vs. 10 months, respectively. The cumulative spermatogenesis success rate at 12 months in the FGFR1 mutation group (35.71%) was lower than that in the mutation-negative group (68.75%) ( p = 0.047 ). The sperm concentration in the mutation-negative group was more easily achieved for different thresholds compared with that in the FGFR1 mutation group, but no significant difference was observed ( p > 0.05 ) between the two groups. The last follow-up examination showed that the testicular volume was 7.00 (4.75–12.00) mL and 10.56 ± 4.82 mL ( p = 0.098 ), the ejaculate volume of sperm was 2.20 (1.40–2.26) mL and 3.06 ± 1.42 mL ( p = 0.175 ), and the sperm concentration was 7.19 (1.00–9.91) million/mL and 18.80 (4.58–53.62) million/mL ( p = 0.038 ) in the FGFR1 mutation and mutation-negative groups, respectively, while the sperm motility (A%, A + B%, and A + B + C%) was similar for the two groups ( p = 0.839 , 0.909, and 0.759, respectively). The testosterone level during treatment was 366.02 ± 167.03 ng/dL and 362.27 ± 212.86 ng/dL in the FGFR1 mutation and mutation-negative groups, respectively ( p = 0.956 ). Conclusion. Patients with FGFR1 mutations have a higher prevalence of cryptorchidism and smaller testicular volume. Although patients with FGFR1 mutations have a similar rate of success for spermatogenesis compared to that of the mutation-negative patients, a longer treatment period was required and a lower sperm concentration was achieved.

Split Hand Foot Malformation Syndrome: A Novel Heterozygous FGFR1 Mutation Detected by Next Generation Sequencing

Background: Split-hand/foot malformation syndrome is a rare, clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of limb malformations characterized by absence/hypoplasia and/or median cleft of hands and/or feet. It may occur as an isolated abnormality or it may be associated with a genetic syndrome. Case Report: In the present case, isolated split-hand/split-foot malformation was diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound at 24 weeks in a male singleton fetus, with deep median cleft of the right hand, syndactyly and hypoplasia of phalanges in both hands, and oligodactyly of the right foot. During consultation, the father of the fetus revealed that he also had an isolated right foot dysplasia. The parents chose elective termination and autopsy confirmed prenatal ultrasound findings. Genetic testing of the aborted fetus with QF-PCR analysis for common aneuploidies and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) showed a male genomic pattern, without aneuploidies or chromosomal imbalances. Further investigation with next generation sequencing of 49 clinically relevant genes revealed a novel heterozygous FGFR1 mutation c.787_789del (p.Ala263del) in the fetus; the father was heterozygous to the same mutation. Conclusion: A novel heterozygous FGFR1 mutation causing split-hand/foot malformation syndrome is reported. Accurate genetic diagnosis allowed detailed counseling to be provided to the couple, including the underlying cause, recurrence risks, and detailed management plan with preimplantation genetic diagnosis for future pregnancies.