macroinvertebrate metrics
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

28
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 847 (9) ◽  
pp. 2169-2191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Erba ◽  
Marcello Cazzola ◽  
Carlo Belfiore ◽  
Andrea Buffagni

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline E. Emilson ◽  
Dean G. Thompson ◽  
Lisa A. Venier ◽  
Teresita M. Porter ◽  
Tom Swystun ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline E. Emilson ◽  
Dean G. Thompson ◽  
Lisa A. Venier ◽  
Teresita M. Porter ◽  
Tom Swystun ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojana Tubic ◽  
Natasa Popovic ◽  
Maja Rakovic ◽  
Аna Petrovic ◽  
Vladica Simic ◽  
...  

The objective of this work is to analyze the effectiveness of two widely used methods for collecting aquatic macroinvertebrate samples: the semiquantitative kick and sweep (K&S) and quantitative Surber net (SN) techniques. Based on our data, the methods were fully comparable as regards analysis of the macroinvertebrate metrics most often used in ecological status assessment (sensitivity/tolerance parameters), while K&S was found to be more successful in the evaluation of biodiversity. Thus, both methods could be used for routine monitoring of the status of water bodies, according to the recommendation of the EU Water Framework Directive, while for research, K&S is more advanced. K&S is also more effective timewise for material collecting. SN sampling is a quantitative method and could thus be used in studies of aquatic ecosystem productivity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melina Mauad ◽  
M. Laura Miserendino ◽  
Miguel A. Risso ◽  
Julieta Massaferro

ABSTRACT Seven sites were examined in the Challhuaco-Ñireco system, located in the reserve of the Nahuel Huapi National Park, however part of the catchment is urbanized, being San Carlos de Bariloche (150,000 inhabitants) placed in the lower part of the basin. Physico-chemical variables were measured and benthic macroinvertebrates were collected during three consecutive years at seven sites from the headwater to the river outlet. Sites near the source of the river were characterised by Plecoptera, Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera and Diptera, whereas sites close to the river mouth were dominated by Diptera, Oligochaeta and Mollusca. Regarding functional feeding groups, collector-gatherers were dominant at all sites and this pattern was consistent among years. Ordination Analysis (RDA) revealed that species assemblages distribution responded to the climatic and topographic gradient (temperature and elevation), but also were associated with variables related to human impact (conductivity, nitrate and phosphate contents). Species assemblages at headwaters were mostly represented by sensitive insects, whereas tolerant taxa such as Tubificidae, Lumbriculidae, Chironomidae and crustacean Aegla sp. were dominant at urbanised sites. Regarding macroinvertebrate metrics employed, total richness, EPT taxa, Shannon diversity index and Biotic Monitoring Patagonian Stream index resulted fairly consistent and evidenced different levels of disturbances at the stream, meaning that this measures are suitable for evaluation of the status of Patagonian mountain streams.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document