photon doppler velocimetry
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

36
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tengfei WU ◽  
Linjie Lv ◽  
Jibo HAN ◽  
Dazhi ZHANG ◽  
Zhiguo Liang

2021 ◽  
Vol 129 (20) ◽  
pp. 205101
Author(s):  
Stanley Bovid ◽  
Allan Clauer ◽  
Micheal Kattoura ◽  
Anupam Vivek ◽  
Glenn Daehn ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 044703
Author(s):  
Pinghan Chu ◽  
Velat Kilic ◽  
Mark A. Foster ◽  
Zhehui Wang

2021 ◽  
Vol 250 ◽  
pp. 01025
Author(s):  
Lukasz Farbaniec ◽  
Yuan Xu ◽  
Junyi Zhou ◽  
Sophoclis Patsias ◽  
Duncan Macdougall ◽  
...  

The Photon Doppler Velocimetry (PDV) technique is used to capture simultaneously propagating elastic waves of longitudinal and shear nature in a Tension-Torsion Hopkinson Bar (TTHB) apparatus. The system uses a pair of probes per velocity measurement, which were taken on the opposite sides of the TTHB bar with a laser irradiated spot size of ~35 µm. The collected data were compared to the measurements obtained from the conventional strain gauge technique, and were in good agreement. The PDV method was effective in separating longitudinal and rotation signals even when they were superimposed on each other at the gauge location. This approach is also shown to be effective in detecting and accounting for the presence of bending waves in the TTHB bars.


Author(s):  
John W. Grove ◽  
Adam C. Coleman ◽  
Carl E. Johnson ◽  
Ralph Menikoff

Abstract A computational verification and validation study of the Cyclops I experiment [1–7] was conducted using the Los Alamos Eulerian Applications code xRage [8]. The purpose of this study was to validate the Scaled Unified Reactive Front (SURF) plus (SURFplus) model for insensitive high explosives [9–12]. Diagnostics from the experiment included photon doppler velocimetry measurements of the encasing shell for the device and proton radiography photographs of the explosions. This data was compared to the xRage computed data and a convergence study of burn front evolution was conducted. We conclude that the SURFplus high explosive model does an excellent job at predicting the high explosive burn front velocity and shape with results that converge to the experimental data at rates near to or better than first order in most cases. Some companion verification metrics for the solution convergence are also described. These metrics show that the xRage computed solution for the high explosive burn front converges to first order or better, as consistent with the treatment of shock fronts in a higher order Godunov hydrodynamic solver as used in xRage.


Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saryu Fensin ◽  
David Jones ◽  
Daniel Martinez ◽  
Calvin Lear ◽  
Jeremy Payton

The effect of helium (He) concentration on ejecta production in OFHC-Copper was investigated using Richtmyer–Meshkov Instability (RMI) experiments. The experiments involved complex samples with periodic surface perturbations machined onto the surface. Each of the four target was implanted with a unique helium concentration that varied from 0 to 4000 appm. The perturbation’s wavelengths were λ ≈ 65 μ m, and their amplitudes h 0 were varied to determine the wavenumber ( 2 π / λ ) amplitude product k h 0 at which ejecta production beganfor Cu with and without He. The velocity and mass of the ejecta produced was quantified using Photon Doppler Velocimetry (PDV) and Lithium-Niobate (LN) pins, respectively. Our results show that there was an increase of 30% in the velocity at which the ejecta cloud was traveling in Copper with 4000 appm as compared to its unimplanted counterpart. Our work also shows that there was a finer cloud of ejecta particles that was not detected by the PDV probes but was detected by the early arrival of a “signal” at the LN pins. While the LN pins were not able to successfully quantify the mass produced due to it being in the solid state, they did provide information on timing. Our results show that ejecta was produced for a longer time in the 4000 appm copper.


2020 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-357
Author(s):  
A. V. Andriyash ◽  
S. A. Dyachkov ◽  
V. V. Zhakhovsky ◽  
D. A. Kalashnikov ◽  
A. N. Kondratev ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document