congestion prediction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

146
(FIVE YEARS 57)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Poularakis ◽  
Qiaofeng Qin ◽  
Franck Le ◽  
Sastry Kompella ◽  
Leandros Tassiulas

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amur Ghose ◽  
Vincent Zhang ◽  
Yingxue Zhang ◽  
Dong Li ◽  
Wulong Liu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilin Pu ◽  
Liang Chu ◽  
Yuanjian Zhang ◽  
Zhuoran Hou ◽  
Jianbing Gao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chenyue Ma ◽  
Yifeng Xiao ◽  
Sifei Wang ◽  
Jun Yu ◽  
Jianli Chen

2021 ◽  
pp. 19-31
Author(s):  
Badr-Eddine Soussi Niaimi ◽  
Mohammed Bouhorma ◽  
Hassan Zili

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 4672-4681
Author(s):  
Shuai Lai ◽  
Jinfeng Wu

Objectives: The transportation problem of Linjiao transit passage in Lhasa City from the perspective of traffic sociology is studied. Methods: Firstly, the research history and current situation of experts in the field of traffic congestion prediction are studied. The common parameters and models of congestion prediction are analyzed. Results: Combined with the complexity of road traffic structure and the possession of a large number of high-dimensional traffic data records, the use of a prediction model is finally determined based on RNN-RBM deep learning network. Through the research and analysis of all-day road traffic flow data, accurate judgment and prediction of traffic congestion status are made. Conclusion: In this paper, the role of the RNN model on the time axis and the state judgment of the RBM network are used to predict the traffic congestion based on the characterization of the congestion sequence.


2021 ◽  
pp. 65-67
Author(s):  
A Prasanth Rao ◽  
Akula Venkata Sai Akhil ◽  
Akku Vivek ◽  
Preetham Reddy Yaramada

Network congestion is a situation that happens when a network is un- able to handle data is more than its threshold value when load becomes high. This situation is known to be network congestion which causes packets to be dropped on the network due to overflow of buffer and therefore leads to data loss and unreliable connection. Therefore, effective congestion control is an important is- sue that needs to be addressed in the transport layer. There are various factors such as hardware, software and miscellaneous factors can lead to network con- gestion. Hardware factors include noncompatible hardware, outdated routers and too many devices connecting to a single router. Software factors include some of the devices following their own protocol, ineffective communication protocols, improper fire walls and proper limitations not defined on the file sizes to be transferred. Poor network design, network hacking and over subscription leads to the miscellaneous factors. As a consequence of such factors, network performance will degrade dramatically, and system performance will be affected. This is an undesirable condition that needs to be corrected. Thus, our model uses classification algorithms which help in predicting network congestion before- hand, thuspreventing the packet loss and damage.


Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 1995
Author(s):  
Pingakshya Goswami ◽  
Dinesh Bhatia

Design closure in general VLSI physical design flows and FPGA physical design flows is an important and time-consuming problem. Routing itself can consume as much as 70% of the total design time. Accurate congestion estimation during the early stages of the design flow can help alleviate last-minute routing-related surprises. This paper has described a methodology for a post-placement, machine learning-based routing congestion prediction model for FPGAs. Routing congestion is modeled as a regression problem. We have described the methods for generating training data, feature extractions, training, regression models, validation, and deployment approaches. We have tested our prediction model by using ISPD 2016 FPGA benchmarks. Our prediction method reports a very accurate localized congestion value in each channel around a configurable logic block (CLB). The localized congestion is predicted in both vertical and horizontal directions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our model on completely unseen designs that are not initially part of the training data set. The generated results show significant improvement in terms of accuracy measured as mean absolute error and prediction time when compared against the latest state-of-the-art works.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya M. Kishk ◽  
Mahmoud Badawy ◽  
Hesham A. Ali ◽  
Ahmed I. Saleh

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 01-19
Author(s):  
Chantakarn Pholpol ◽  
Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn

In recent years, a new wireless network called vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET), has become a popular research topic. VANET allows communication among vehicles and with roadside units by providing information to each other, such as vehicle velocity, location and direction. In general, when many vehicles likely to use the common route to proceed to the same destination, it can lead to a congested route that should be avoided. It may be better if vehicles are able to predict accurately the traffic congestion and then avoid it. Therefore, in this work, the deep reinforcement learning in VANET to enhance the ability to predict traffic congestion on the roads is proposed. Furthermore, different types of neural networks namely Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) are investigated and compared in this deep reinforcement learning model to discover the most effective one. Our proposed method is tested by simulation. The traffic scenarios are created using traffic simulator called Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) before integrating with deep reinforcement learning model. The simulation procedures, as well as the programming used, are described in detail. The performance of our proposed method is evaluated using two metrics; the average travelling time delay and average waiting time delay of vehicles. According to the simulation results, the average travelling time delay and average waiting time delay are gradually improved over the multiple runs, since our proposed method receives feedback from the environment. In addition, the results without and with three different deep learning algorithms, i.e., CNN, MLP and LSTM are compared. It is obvious that the deep reinforcement learning model works effectively when traffic density is neither too high nor too low. In addition, it can be concluded that the effective algorithms for traffic congestion prediction models in descending order are MLP, CNN, and LSTM, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document