poison centers
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

239
(FIVE YEARS 40)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Michael C. Beuhler ◽  
Henry A. Spiller ◽  
Dalia Alwasiyah ◽  
Robert Bassett ◽  
Jeanette Trella ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Spyker ◽  
Alvin C. Bronstein ◽  
Julie A. Weber
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
James B. Leonard ◽  
Faisal S. Minhaj ◽  
Emily Paterson ◽  
Wendy Klein-Schwartz
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Faisal Syed Minhaj ◽  
James B. Leonard ◽  
Wendy Klein-Schwartz

Author(s):  
Janessa M. Graves ◽  
Julia A. Dilley ◽  
Lucia Terpak ◽  
Ashley Brooks‐Russell ◽  
Jennifer M. Whitehill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Saumitra V. Rege ◽  
Moira Smith ◽  
Heather A. Borek ◽  
Christopher P. Holstege
Keyword(s):  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-166
Author(s):  
Jody L. Green ◽  
Taryn Dailey-Govoni ◽  
Stephen V. Faraone ◽  
Kevin M. Antshel

AbstractThe National Poison Data System (NPDS), is the data warehouse for the 55 US regional poison centers. While the primary role of a poison center is to provide medical management to the public and healthcare providers, a standardized database is used to collect case data. These data are routinely used to evaluate drug safety, including characterization of prescription medication misuse and abuse. While an effective therapy for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), prescription stimulant medications (RxStim) may be misused and abused, a behavior that has been noted as an emerging public health concern particularly in relation to polysubstance abuse. The objective of this study was to characterize intentional exposures to RxStim in patients age >12 y of age as managed by US poison centers from Jan 2015- 31 Dec 2019.NPDS cases of intentional exposure to a RxStim in a patient >12 y managed from Jan 2015-Dec 2019 were included for analysis. Intentional exposures are defined in the NPDS manual as exposures that involve a purposeful action. These include intentional misuse, intentional abuse and intentional unknown cases. Intentional suspected suicide cases were excluded.A total of 12,972 cases met inclusion criteria, of which 62.5% involved a male patient. Most patients were aged 13–19 y (34.7%) or 20–39 y (50.5%). Over one-half (53.3%) of cases were intentional abuse, 29.1% intentional misuse, and 17.6% intentional unknown. While most exposures were via oral route of administration (90.7%), 9.5% were via inhalation/intranasal and 2.4% via injection (multiple routes may be reported). Other substances in addition to a RxStim were involved in 48.2% of cases, including benzodiazepines (11.2%), alcohol (8.8%), marijuana (5.1%), cocaine (3.7%), methamphetamine (3.0%) and atypical antipsychotics (2.5%). The majority of cases resulted in significant medical outcome (60.3%). This included 39.3% with a moderate effect (medical attention indicated, not life-threatening), 6.1% major effect (life-threatening), 1.0% death and 14.0% lost to follow-up but judged as a potentially toxic exposure. Another 22.4% reported minimally bothersome effects. Admission to a healthcare facility was reported for 1 out of 3 cases and another 36.3% were treated/evaluated/released from a healthcare service. An average of 2.3 clinical effects were reported per exposure, the most common being neurological effects (53.2%; examples include agitation, drowsiness/lethargy, confusion, hallucinations/delusions, tremor), cardiovascular effects (50.8%; examples include tachycardia, hypertension), and gastrointestinal effects (9.4%; examples include vomiting, nausea).RxStim misuse and abuse cases managed by US poison centers most often leads to significant medical outcomes which require medical attention. The role of these medications in polysubstance abuse is concerning and suggestive of needed strategies to address this increasingly important public health concern.Funding: Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC


2020 ◽  
pp. 096032712097582
Author(s):  
Constantine I Vardavas ◽  
Charis Girvalaki ◽  
Satomi Odani ◽  
Katerina Nikitara ◽  
Irma de Vries ◽  
...  

Background: Following the implementation of the European Union Tobacco Product Directive (EU TPD) regulations on e-cigarette products in 2016, we assessed the current profile of e-cigarette liquid exposure incidents and their associated health outcomes. Methods: De-identified data were received from poison centers in eight EU Member States (Sweden, the Netherlands, Italy, Hungary Austria, Finland, Spain and Croatia) reporting on e-cigarette liquid exposure incidents between August 2018 to December 2019. Descriptive analysis was conducted to present incident characteristics and health outcomes. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to test associations. Results: Of the 223 e-liquid exposure incidents recorded by poison centers in multiple EU MS, 64.7% of the cases were unintentional exposures, ranging from 48.4% among adults aged ≥19 years to 100.0% among children aged 0–5 years (p < 0.05). The most frequent route of exposure was ingestion (73.5%) while55.2% experienced any clinical symptoms, including nausea (16.6%), vomiting (11.1%), and dizziness (9.0%). 57.8% of the cases were treated at the residence or on-site. Conclusion: Further monitoring is warranted, using uniform reporting requirements, to ensure the continued compliance to the EU TPD and assess its long-term impact on related incident characteristics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document