metallogenic mechanism
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

32
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Liuyang Xu ◽  
Yaotian Yin ◽  
Sheng Jin ◽  
Wenbo Wei ◽  
Ziqiong Hao ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yixiao Han ◽  
Yunhua Liu ◽  
Wenyuan Li

Located in the East Kunlun Orogen, China, the Xiarihamu magmatic nickel–cobalt sulfide deposit is the country’s second largest deposit of this type. It was formed in special early Paleozoic with low copper grade (0.14 wt%) compared with other deposits of the same type. The mineralogy of nickel and cobalt minerals, which are direct carriers of these elements, can clearly reflect their behavior in the process of mineralization; however, such information for this deposit remains unreported. In the present study, we use an electron microscope and electron probe microanalyzer to delineate and analyze many nickel and cobalt minerals such as maucherite, nickeline, cobaltite, violarite, gersdorffite, parkerite, and arsenohauchecornite in various rocks and ores. With the increase in crustal material contamination, it can reach arsenide saturation locally in sulfide melt, then a separate Ni-rich arsenide (bismuth) melt exsolves somewhere. This melt will crystallize into nickeline, parkerite, arsenohauchecornite, and maucherite first. Second, most of nickel and cobalt tend to enter cobaltite and pentlandite phases, rather than existing in chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite phases as isomorphism during sufficient fractional crystallization of sulfide melt, which gathered nickel and cobalt elements widely. Also, more than one magma might result in the superposition of ore-forming elements. Later, the ore-forming elements redistribute limitedly through a hydrothermal process. The metallogenic mechanism model of nickel and cobalt established in the present study not only explains the process of nickel–cobalt mineralization in Xiarihamu but also can be applied to similar deposits and has a wide universal replicability.


Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shangsong Yang ◽  
Heng Wang ◽  
Xinyou Zhu ◽  
Tao Zou ◽  
Chaolei Yang ◽  
...  

Skarn Sn-polymetallic deposits, located in the southern Great Khingan Range, can be divided into Sn–Fe and Sn–Pb–Zn deposits. By systematically studying the geochemical characteristics of source granitoid and deposits, the ore-forming mechanisms were established, and the differences in ore-forming processes between Sn–Fe and Sn–Pb–Zn deposits are discussed. The main findings are as follows: (1) these two deposits were formed in the Late-Yanshanian period; (2) the source granitoid evolved at an early stage in a reducing environment, while the oxygen fugacity increased at a late stage through the influence of a deep-seated fault; (3) fine-grained syenogranite from Dashishan showed a higher degree of evolution than the syenogranite from Damogutu; (4) the Damogutu Sn–Fe and Dashishan Sn–Pb–Zn deposits shared a source of ore-forming fluid, and Fe, Sn, Pb, and Zn all derived from Late-Yanshanian granitoids; and (5) the ore-forming fluid experienced a continuous evolution process from the magmatic to hydrothermal stage, and the magmatic–hydrothermal transitional fluid played a very important role in skarnization and mineralization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document