vein type
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

261
(FIVE YEARS 74)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong Ha Lee ◽  
Jung Hun Seo ◽  
Bong Chul Yoo ◽  
Bum Han Lee ◽  
Seung Hee Han ◽  
...  

Haman, Gunbuk, and Daejang deposits are neighboring vein-type hydrothermal Cu deposits located in the SE part of the Korean Peninsula. These three deposits are formed by magmatic-hydrothermal activity associated with a series of Cretaceous granodioritic intrusions of the Jindong Granitoids, which have created a series of veins and alterations in a hornfelsed shale formation. The copper deposits have common veining and alteration features: 1) a pervasive chlorite-epidote alteration, cut by 2) Cu-Pb-Zn-bearing quartz veins with a tourmaline-biotite alteration, and 3) the latest barren calcite veins. Chalcopyrite, pyrite, and pyrrhotite are common ore minerals in the three deposits. Whereas magnetite is a dominant mineral in the Haman and Gunbuk deposits, no magnetite is present, but sphalerite and galena are abundant in the Daejang deposit. Ore-bearing quartz veins have three types of fluid inclusions: 1) liquid-rich, 2) vapor-rich, and 3) brine inclusions. Hydrothermal temperatures obtained from the brine inclusion assemblages are about 340–600, 250–500, and 320–460°C in the Haman, Gunbuk, and Daejang deposits, respectively. The maximum temperatures (from 460 to 600°C) recorded in the fluid inclusions of the three deposits are higher than those of the Cu ore precipitating temperature of typical porphyry-like deposits (from 300 to 400°C). Raman spectroscopy of vapor inclusions showed the presence of CO2 and CH4 in the three deposits, which indicates relatively reduced hydrothermal conditions as compared with typical porphyry deposits. The Rb/Sr ratios and Cs concentrations of brine inclusions suggest that the Daejang deposit was formed by a later and more fractionated magma than the Haman and Gunbuk deposits, and the Daejang deposit has lower Fe/Mn ratios in brine inclusions than the Haman and Gunbuk deposits, which indicates contrasting redox conditions in hydrothermal fluids possibly caused by an interaction with a hosting shale formation. In brines, concentrations of base metals do not change significantly with temperature, which suggests that significant ore mineralization precipitation is unlikely below current exposure levels, especially at the Haman deposit. Ore and alteration mineral petrography and fluid inclusions suggest that the Haman deposit was formed near the top of the deep intrusion center, whereas the Gunbuk deposit was formed at a shallower intrusion periphery. The Daejang deposit was formed later at a shallow depth by relatively fractionated magma.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1309
Author(s):  
Qiaojuan Yan ◽  
Zhengle Chen ◽  
Zhenju Zhou ◽  
Tongyang Zhao ◽  
Qiong Han ◽  
...  

The newly discovered Juyuan tungsten deposit is hosted in Triassic granite in the Beishan Orogen, NW China. The tungsten mineralization occurred as quartz veins, and the main ore minerals included wolframite and scheelite. The age, origin, and tectonic setting of the Juyuan tungsten deposit, however, remain poorly understood. According to the mineralogical assemblages and crosscutting relationships, three hydrothermal stages can be identified, i.e., the early stage of quartz veins with scheelite and wolframite, the intermediate stage of quartz veinlets with sulfides, and the late stage of carbonate-quartz veinlets with tungsten being mainly introduced in the early stage. Quartz formed in the two earlier stages contained four compositional types of fluid inclusions, i.e., pure CO2, CO2-H2O, daughter mineral-bearing, and NaCl-H2O, but the late-stage quartz only contained the NaCl-H2O inclusions. The inclusions in quartz formed in the early, intermediate, and late stages had total homogenization temperatures of 230–344 °C, 241−295 °C, and 184−234 °C, respectively, with salinities no higher than 7.2 wt.% NaCl equiv (equivalent). Trapping pressures estimated from the CO2-H2O inclusions were 33−256 MPa and 36−214 MPa in the early and intermediate stages, corresponding to mineralization depths of 3–8 km. Fluid boiling and mixing caused rapid precipitation of wolframite, scheelite, and sulfides. Through boiling and inflow of meteoric water, the ore-forming fluid system evolved from CO2-rich to CO2-poor in composition and from magmatic to meteoric, as indicated by decreasing δ18Owater values from early to late stages. The sulfur and lead isotope compositions in the intermediate-stage suggest that the Triassic granite was a significant source of ore metals. The biotite 40Ar/39Ar age from the W-bearing quartz shows that the Juyuan tungsten system was formed at 240.0 ± 1.0 Ma, coeval with the emplacement of granitic rocks at the deposit. Integrating the data obtained from the studies including regional geology, ore geology, biotite Ar-Ar geochronology, fluid inclusion, and C-H-O-S-Pb isotope geochemistry, we conclude that the Juyuan tungsten deposit was a quartz-vein type system that originated from the emplacement of the granites, which was induced by collision between the Tarim and Kazakhstan–Ili plates. A comparison of the characteristics of tungsten mineralization in East Tianshan and Beishan suggests that the Triassic tungsten metallogenic belt in East Tianshan extends to the Beishan orogenic belt and that the west of the orogenic belt also has potential for the discovery of further quartz-vein-type tungsten deposits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benqiang Tang ◽  
Songjie Xu ◽  
Xueming Chen ◽  
Libin Cui ◽  
Yanhui Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The impact of intravertebral cleft (IVC) on cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) has been discussed. However, the results were conflicting, as the study population and cement leakage classification were heterogeneous. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of IVC on the incidence of leakage through vein, leakage through cortex as well as general leakage in PVP for OVCFs. Methods All patients with OVCFs who underwent PVP between January 2016 and June 2019 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were eligible for this case-control study if they were diagnosed as single level fracture in spine. After inclusive and exclusive criteria were met, a total of 139 patients with IVC were enrolled as the study group. Non-IVC controls were matched in a 1:1 ratio in age (within 3 years), sex and fracture severity with patients in study group. Cement leakage were classified into four types [type B (through basivertebral vein), type S (through segmental vein), type-C (through a cortical defect), and type D (intradiscal leakage)], furtherly into two types [venous type (type-B or/and type S) and cortical type (type-C or/and type-D)]. A general leakage rate and a specific leakage rate per each type were compared between both groups. Results Each group included 139 patients. Groups were homogenous for age, sex, fracture severity, fracture location, fracture type, cement volume, puncture approach and property of cement. Compared with control group, IVC group had a significantly lower rate of type-B (20.9% vs. 31.7%, P = 0.041), type-S (24.5% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.000), and venous type leakage (37.4% vs. 67.6%, P = 0.000), a significantly higher rate of type-C (25.9% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.004), type-D (16.5% vs. 6.5%, P = 0.009), and cortical type leakage (40.3% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.000), no significant difference on the rate of general leakage (67.6% vs. 76.3%, P = 0.109). Conclusion IVC decreased the risk of cement leakage through vein and increased the risk of cement leakage through cortex. However, it had no significant effect on the occurrence of general leakage.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104413
Author(s):  
Gui-cong Fang ◽  
Cheng Xu ◽  
Jia-xu Wu ◽  
Yun-biao Zhao ◽  
Qi-quan Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 104137
Author(s):  
Haijie Zhao ◽  
Leon Bagas ◽  
Shunda Yuan ◽  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Zhangfa Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 104120
Author(s):  
Guotao Sun ◽  
Qingdong Zeng ◽  
Jia-Xi Zhou ◽  
Lingli Zhou ◽  
Peiwen Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document