lung irradiation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

226
(FIVE YEARS 47)

H-INDEX

33
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annaïg Bertho ◽  
Morgane Dos Santos ◽  
Sarah Braga-Cohen ◽  
Valérie Buard ◽  
Vincent Paget ◽  
...  

Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy is characterized by a reduction in target volumes and the use of severely hypofractionated schedules. Preclinical modeling became possible thanks to rodent-dedicated irradiation devices allowing accurate beam collimation and focal lung exposure. Given that a great majority of publications use single dose exposures, the question we asked in this study was as follows: in incremented preclinical models, is it worth using fractionated protocols or should we continue focusing solely on volume limitation? The left lungs of C57BL/6JRj mice were exposed to ionizing radiation using arc therapy and 3 × 3 mm beam collimation. Three-fraction schedules delivered over a period of 1 week were used with 20, 28, 40, and 50 Gy doses per fraction. Lung tissue opacification, global histological damage and the numbers of type II pneumocytes and club cells were assessed 6 months post-exposure, together with the gene expression of several lung cells and inflammation markers. Only the administration of 3 × 40 Gy or 3 × 50 Gy generated focal lung fibrosis after 6 months, with tissue opacification visible by cone beam computed tomography, tissue scarring and consolidation, decreased club cell numbers and a reactive increase in the number of type II pneumocytes. A fractionation schedule using an arc-therapy-delivered three fractions/1 week regimen with 3 × 3 mm beam requires 40 Gy per fraction for lung fibrosis to develop within 6 months, a reasonable time lapse given the mouse lifespan. A comparison with previously published laboratory data suggests that, in this focal lung irradiation configuration, administering a Biological Effective Dose ≥ 1000 Gy should be recommended to obtain lung fibrosis within 6 months. The need for such a high dose per fraction challenges the appropriateness of using preclinical highly focused fractionation schedules in mice.


Author(s):  
Govindaraj Ganesan ◽  
Sasipriya Ponniah ◽  
Vivek Sundaram ◽  
Praveen Kumar Marimuthu ◽  
Venkatraman Pitchaikannu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Govindaraj Ganesan ◽  
Sasipriya Ponniah ◽  
Vivek Sundaram ◽  
Praveen Kumar Marimuthu ◽  
Venkatraman Pitchaikannu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C.S. Ortiz ◽  
D. Hernández ◽  
C. Trujillo ◽  
D. Calderón ◽  
P. Esqueda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude J. Rogers ◽  
Espoir M. Kyubwa ◽  
Agnes I. Lukaszewicz ◽  
Mark A. Starbird ◽  
Michelle Nguyen ◽  
...  

A radiological/nuclear (RAD-NUC) incident, especially in an urban setting, results in diverse radiation-induced injuries due to heterogeneities in dose, the extent of partial-body shielding, human biodiversity and pre-existing health conditions. For example, acute radiation syndrome (ARS) can result in death within days to weeks of exposure to 0.7–10 Gy doses and is associated with destruction of the bone marrow, known as hematopoietic ARS (H-ARS). However, partial-body shielding that spares a portion of the bone marrow from exposure can significantly reduce the occurrence of H-ARS, but delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE) can still occur within months or years after exposure depending on the individual. In a mass casualty event, ideal triage must be able to pre-symptomatically identify individuals likely to develop radiation-induced injuries and provide an appropriate treatment plan. Today, while there are FDA approved treatments for hematopoietic ARS, there are no approved diagnosis for radiation injury and no approved treatments for the broad spectra of injuries associated with radiation. This has resulted in a major capability gap in the nations preparedness to a potentially catastrophic RAD-NUC event. Circulating microRNA (miRNA) are a promising class of biomarkers for this application because the molecules are accessible via a routine blood draw and are excreted by various tissues throughout the body. To test if miRNA can be used to predict distinct tissue-specific radiation-induced injuries, we compared the changes to the circulating miRNA profiles after total-body irradiation (TBI) and whole thorax lung irradiation (WTLI) in non-human primates at doses designed to induce ARS (day 2 postirradiation; 2–6.5 Gy) and DEARE (day 15 postirradiation; 9.8 or 10.7 Gy), respectively. In both models, miRNA sequences were identified that correlated with the onset of severe neutropenia (counts <500 μL–1; TBI) or survival (WTLI). This method identified panels of eleven miRNA for both model and assigned functional roles for the panel members using gene ontology enrichment analysis. A common signature of radiation-induced injury was observed in both models: apoptosis, DNA damage repair, p53 signaling, pro-inflammatory response, and growth factor/cytokine signaling pathways were predicted to be disrupted. In addition, injury-specific pathways were identified. In TBI, pathways associated with ubiquitination, specifically of histone H2A, were enriched, suggesting more impact to DNA damage repair mechanisms and apoptosis. In WTLI, pro-fibrotic pathways including transforming growth factor (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathways were enriched, consistent with the onset of late lung injury. These results suggest that miRNA may indeed be able to predict the onset of distinct types of radiation-induced injuries.


Author(s):  
Nima Mousavi Darzikolaee ◽  
Kasra Kolahdouzan ◽  
Hamidreza Abtahi ◽  
Hossein Kazemizadeh ◽  
Mohammadreza Salehi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
G. Govindaraj ◽  
P. Sasipriya ◽  
Vivek Sundaram ◽  
M. Praveen Kumar ◽  
P. Venkatraman ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2789
Author(s):  
Massimo E. Abate ◽  
Silvia Cammelli ◽  
Letizia Ronchi ◽  
Barbara Diletto ◽  
Lorenza Gandola ◽  
...  

Purpose: To analyze toxicity and outcome predictors in Ewing sarcoma patients with lung metastases treated with busulfan and melphalan (BU-MEL) followed by whole-lung irradiation (WLI). Methods: This retrospective study included 68 lung metastatic Ewing Sarcoma patients who underwent WLI after BU-MEL with autologous stem cell transplantation, as part of two prospective and consecutive treatment protocols. WLI 12 Gy for <14 years old and 15 Gy for ≥14 years old patients were applied at least eight weeks after BU-MEL. Toxicity, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and pulmonary relapse-free survival (PRFS) were estimated and analyzed. Results: After WLI, grade 1–2 and grade 3 clinical toxicity was reported in 16.2% and 5.9% patients, respectively. The five-year OS, EFS and PRFS with 95% confidence interval (CI) were 69.8% (57.1–79.3), 61.2% (48.4–71.7) and 70.5% (56.3–80.8), respectively. Patients with good histological necrosis of the primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed a significant decreased risk of pulmonary relapse or death compared to patients with poor histological necrosis. Conclusions: WLI at recommended doses and time interval after BU-MEL is feasible and might contribute to the disease control in Ewing sarcoma with lung metastases and responsive disease. Further studies are needed to explore the treatment stratification based on the histological response of the primary tumor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document