soxrs regulon
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 329 ◽  
pp. 109222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simranbir Kaur ◽  
Ludmil T. Benov

2001 ◽  
Vol 382 (7) ◽  
pp. 1071-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucymara F. Agnez-Lima ◽  
Paolo Di Mascio ◽  
Bruce Demple ◽  
Carlos F.M. Menck

AbstractThe electronically excited molecular oxygen (singlet oxygen, [1]O[2]) can be detrimental to cells in several ways, although recent reports indicate that it may play a role as an intercellular signal in eukaryotes. Here we present evidence that [1]O[2], generated by thermodissociation of disodium 3,3(1,4-naphthylidene) diproprionate endoperoxide, activates transcription of genes of the soxRS regulon, and that this induction is paralleled by induction of a soxS::lacZ operon fusion. The inductions were dependent on a functional soxR gene. These data imply that protective responses, such as induction of the soxRS regulon, may be triggered by diverse environmental oxidative stresses, and that [1]O[2] may also function as a signal molecule in prokaryotes.


2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (23) ◽  
pp. 6842-6844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Manchado ◽  
Carmen Michán ◽  
Carmen Pueyo

ABSTRACT By multiplex reverse transcription-PCR, we demonstrate that the SoxRS response, which protects cells against superoxide toxicity, is triggered also by hydrogen peroxide. SoxR-dependent inductions of 7.3-, 7.6-, 4.6-, 2.2-, and 2.6-fold were quantified for soxS,micF, sodA, inaA, andfpr transcripts, respectively. This finding suggests an extensive and tight connectivity between different regulatory pathways in the Escherichia coli response to oxidative stress.


1999 ◽  
Vol 274 (46) ◽  
pp. 33178
Author(s):  
Stefan I. Liochev ◽  
Ludmil Benov ◽  
Daniele Touati ◽  
Irwin Fridovich

1999 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 3537-3539 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. I. Liochev ◽  
A. Hausladen ◽  
I. Fridovich

1998 ◽  
Vol 180 (6) ◽  
pp. 1402-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Strohmeier Gort ◽  
James A. Imlay

ABSTRACT Cells devoid of cytosolic superoxide dismutase (SOD) suffer enzyme inactivation, growth deficiencies, and DNA damage. It has been proposed that the scant superoxide (O2 −) generated by aerobic metabolism harms even cells that contain abundant SOD. However, this idea has been difficult to test. To determine the amount of O2 − that is needed to cause these defects, we modulated the O2 − concentration insideEscherichia coli by controlling the expression of SOD. An increase in O2 − of more than twofold above wild-type levels substantially diminished the activity of labile dehydratases, an increase in O2 − of any more than fourfold measurably impaired growth, and a fivefold increase in O2 − sensitized cells to DNA damage. These results indicate that E. coli constitutively synthesizes just enough SOD to defend biomolecules against endogenous O2 − so that modest increases in O2 − concentration diminish cell fitness. This conclusion is in excellent agreement with quantitative predictions based upon previously determined rates of intracellular O2 − production, O2 −dismutation, dehydratase inactivation, and enzyme repair. The vulnerability of bacteria to increased intracellular O2 − explains the widespread use of superoxide-producing drugs as bactericidal weapons in nature. E. coli responds to such drugs by inducing the SoxRS regulon, which positively regulates synthesis of SOD and other defensive proteins. However, even toxic amounts of endogenous O2 −did not activate SoxR, and SoxR activation by paraquat was not at all inhibited by excess SOD. Therefore, in responding to redox-cycling drugs, SoxR senses some signal other than O2 −.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document