relationship distress
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

97
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 641-641
Author(s):  
Lauren Beech ◽  
Vicki Stringfellow ◽  
Scottie Day ◽  
Aric Schadler ◽  
Asha Shenoi

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-41
Author(s):  
Veronica Kallos-Lilly ◽  
Jennifer Fitzgerald

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica N. Lawrence ◽  
Aric D. Schadler ◽  
Asha N. Shenoi

Author(s):  
Terje Tilden ◽  
Pål Ulvenes ◽  
Rune Zahl‐Olsen ◽  
Asle Hoffart ◽  
Sverre Urnes Johnson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Susan C. South

Committed, long-term romantic relationships are ubiquitous among modern society. They are one of the most important contexts for the development, maintenance, and treatment of psychopathology. In this review, I first place psychopathology within the most commonly cited theoretical model of marital satisfaction and stability and then discuss how relationship satisfaction is conceptualized and assessed in this literature. In the second half of the review, I describe the theories regarding how romantic relationships may be connected to psychopathology. Relationship distress is easily incorporated into a diathesis–stress model as an important trigger for psychopathology. Next, I review cross-sectional research, longitudinal research, and treatment efficacy research linking relationship quality and psychopathology. I provide evidence for the robustness of these effects and areas where research must expand. I finish with a summary section that synthesizes what is known about the mechanisms linking relationship distress and psychopathology. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 17 is May 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Author(s):  
Mark A. Whisman ◽  
David A. Sbarra ◽  
Steven R.H. Beach

This article provides a critical review of existing research on intimate (marriage or marriage-like) relationship distress and risk for depression. Using the meta-framework of research triangulation, we seek to synthesize research evidence across several different methodologies and study designs and to draw the most reliable conclusion regarding a potential causal association between relationship distress and depression. Focusing on existing correlational (i.e., observational), genetically informed, and intervention (i.e., experimental) research on the association between relationship distress and depression, we conclude that the existing body of research evidence supports the claim that relationship distress is a causal risk factor for depression. A secondary aim of the article is to highlight a variety of effective methods that, when viewed from the perspective of triangulation, enhance the pursuit of causal inference, including propensity score matching, target trial emulation, directed acyclic graph approach, and Mendelian randomization. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 17 is May 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document