The Clinical Effect of Digital Dorsal Fascial Island Flap Combined With Crossfinger Flap for Repairing Distal Degloving Injury and Sensory Reconstruction

BackgroundTo explore the clinical effect of digital dorsal fascial island flap combined with crossfinger flap to repair distal degloving injury and sensory reconstruction.MethodsA total of 19 patients with distal fingertip degloving injuries treated with digital dorsal fascial island flap combined with crossfinger flap in our hospital from April 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively included. Semmes–Weinstein (SW) monofilament and static two-point discrimination (S-2PD) tests, active range-of-motion (ROM) of the fingers, cold intolerance, visual analog scale (VAS) score patient complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.ResultsFive cases with post-operative flap blisters were treated at the time of dressing changes until successful scab formation. Three cases with post-operative arterial crisis of finger arterial dorsal branch vessel were relieved after suture removal and tension reduction. All other skin flaps and skin grafts survived. Nineteen patients received follow-up between 3 and 26 months (average 14.6 months). The active ROM of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints of the injured fingers were satisfactory.ConclusionThe digital dorsal fascial island flap combined with the crossfinger flap for repairing the distal degloving injury of the distal segment of the finger is a good surgical method, which is simple and easy to operate, can repair a large area of soft tissue defect, and obtain a satisfactory effect.

Sensory Reconstruction of a Posterior Heel Defect Using a Proximally Based Sensate Medial Plantar Flap with Retrograde Nerve Cleavage Technique

Reconstruction of posterior heel defects is important because it requires thick and durable skin that can withstand pressure and shear from shoe and bed contact. Therefore, the sensate flap could be a better option for the defect. This paper reports on the safety of a medial plantar sensory flap for these defects as well as an objective measurement of the sensation of the medial plantar flap and the plantar surface distal to the donor site. Twelve patients had soft-tissue defects in the posterior heel and underwent reconstructive surgery using a proximally based sensate medial plantar sensory flap. Cases of plantar defects involving not posterior heel were excluded. For wider flap coverage, special neurovascular dissection was required. We evaluated levels of sensation quantitatively using Semmes–Weinstein (SW) monofilaments and a two-point discriminator at the final follow-up. All flaps survived without major complications. Postoperative follow-up was 12 to 64 months (mean 26 months). All 12 flaps healed without postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in minimal two-point discrimination and SW evaluator size between the transferred medial plantar flap area and the contralateral heel area or between the plantar area distal to the donor site and the contralateral side. Patients could walk normally and sleep without protective shoes or brace. A proximally based sensate medial plantar flap is a good option for the reconstruction of posterior heel defects. It can restore the characteristics of the posterior heel for shoe wearing and sleeping.