Cost-effectiveness of oral anticancer drugs and associated individualised dosing approaches in patients with cancer: protocol for a systematic review

IntroductionOral anticancer drugs (OADs) have rapidly expanded with more than 70 OADs targeting several molecular targets. Many of the OADs exert an exposure–response relationship but still, a ‘one-size fits-all’ dose is used, ignoring interindividual variability. Several of these OADs share similar mechanisms of actions and thus target the same cancer and has resulted in a substantial research focus on comparing the health benefit of each. However, significantly less is known about the cost–benefit associated with OADs. This paper will provide a protocol to systematically review studies that have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of OADs and their associated individualised dosing interventions.Methods and analysisSystematic review methodology will be applied to identify, select and extract data from published economic evaluation (costs and outcomes/benefits) studies of OADs and their associated individualised dosing interventions. Bibliographic databases (eg, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE) will be used to perform the systematic literature search (between 1 January 2000 and October 2020). Only full economic evaluations will be included, but no restrictions on study outcomes will be applied. The quality of included primary studies will be assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist for reporting economic evaluations. Studies with low-quality evidence will be excluded. A narrative synthesis of the results from the included studies will be undertaken, with a subgroup analysis where appropriate.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review will not require ethics approval as there will not be any collection of primary data. Findings of this review will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at workshops or conferences and sharing through a media release. Findings from this review will provide evidence to direct and inform policy-makers where cost-neutral strategies may be effective or where dose individualising strategies may be economically beneficial. Additionally, gaps will be identified in the current literature to inform future-related research.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020218170.Electronic supplemental materialThe online version of this article contains supplemental material, which is available to authorised users.

O-114 Improved safety and efficiency of individualised versus conventional gonadotropin dosing for ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI: an individual patient meta-analysis (IPD-MA)

Study question Does an individualised, weight- and AMH-based dosing approach with follitropin delta improve live birth rate, safety, and efficiency, compared to conventional dosing in IVF/ICSI? Summary answer Individualised ovarian stimulation performs similarly for live birth rate (increased in normal-high AMH), and reduces the incidence of OHSS and total FSH dosage. What is known already Previous studies investigated the effect of individualized gonadotropin dosing in IVF/ICSI using ovarian reserve tests such as anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC). A Cochrane Review concluded that individualised dosing in IVF is associated with a reduction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), but no effect on live birth rate. It is hypothesized that an individualised dosing approach is predominantly beneficial in the patients who are potentially normal or high responders. This study addresses the performance of a new human recombinant FSH (follitropin delta) with individualised dosing based on AMH and body weight. Study design, size, duration This is an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) of three follitropin delta phase 3 trials, executed in Europe and North- and South America, South-East Asia, and Japan. All trials were randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, multicenter studies in which individualised follitropin delta vs. conventional follitropin alpha or beta were compared. Women were followed from inclusion, at start of their first fresh IVF/ICSI cycle, until 4 weeks after live birth. Participants/materials, setting, methods Women aged 20-40 yrs, undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle, were randomly assigned to follitropin delta (AMH < 15 pmol/L: 12 µg/day; AMH ≥ 15 pmol/L: 0.10-0.19 µg/kg/day: maximum 12 µg/day) or conventional follitropin alpha or beta (150 IU/day for 5 days, possible subsequent dose adjustments). The IPD-MA was performed using logistic regression analysis. Planned subgroup analyses were performed for expected normal/high responders (serum AMH ≥15 pmol/L), and expected low responders (serum AMH <15 pmol/L). Main results and the role of chance Nearly 2,700 women were randomised and exposed: n = 1,348 for conventional dosing regimen with follitropin alpha or beta, and n = 1,334 for individualised dosing with follitropin delta. Live birth rate was similar for both groups (29.5% in follitropin delta vs. 26.9% in follitropin alpha/beta; OR 1.14 (0.96-1.35)). However, in expected normal to high responders live birth rate was significantly increased for those receiving individualised follitropin delta (31.4% vs. 25.9%; OR 1.31 (1.06 - 1.62)). Mean number of transferred embryos/blastocysts was comparable (0.95 vs. 0.94, respectively; mean difference 0.0076; NS), and did not differ when subgroup analyses were performed for normal/high AMH and low AMH. The occurrence of early OHSS was significantly reduced in individualised follitropin delta (4.0% vs. 6.4%; OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.43-0.88)), in subgroup analyses a similar reduction was identified. Total dosage of FSH was significantly lower in individualized follitropin delta (84.5 vs. 112.1 µg; mean difference -27.5 µg (95% CI -30.0 - -25.1)), with a more pronounced effect in normal to high AMH (mean difference -36.5 µg (95% CI -39.2 - -33.7)). Gestational age and birth weight were similar. The IPD-MA identified similar findings among women from the three studies with their different ethnic backgrounds. Limitations, reasons for caution For individualised dosing with follitropin delta, it was observed that the number of cryopreserved embryos was significantly lower (2.4 vs. 3.0, mean difference -0.67 (p < 0.05)), and it remains unclear whether this affects cumulative live birth rate. Wider implications of the findings Individualised dosing with gonadotropin delta is similarly successful in terms of live birth (increased for normal-high AMH women), reduces safety risks, and is more effective with regard to gonadotropin dosage, compared with conventional dosing in IVF/ICSI. Treatment costs are reduced by prescription of lower gonadotropin doses and OHSS reduction. Trial registration number NCT01956110, NCT03228680, NCT03296527

O-110 A randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial assessing clinical outcomes of individualised dosing with follitropin delta in Asian IVF/ICSI patients

Study question To evaluate the efficacy and safety of individualised dosing with follitropin delta versus conventional dosing with follitropin alfa in an Asian population undergoing ovarian stimulation. Summary answer Individualised dosing with follitropin delta results in significantly higher live birth rate and fewer early OHSS and/or preventive interventions compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing. What is known already Previous randomised controlled trials conducted in Europe, North- and South America mainly including Caucasian IVF/ICSI patients as well as in Japan have demonstrated that ovarian stimulation with the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen based on serum AMH level and body weight modulated the ovarian response and reduced the risk of OHSS without compromising pregnancy and live birth rates. Study design, size, duration Randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial conducted in 1,009 Asian patients from mainland China, South Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan, undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Randomisation was stratified by age (<35, 35-37, 38-40 years). The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy assessed 10-11 weeks after transfer (non-inferiority limit -10.0%; analysis adjusted for age strata). Patients <35 years underwent single embryo transfer if a good-quality embryo was available, otherwise double embryo transfer. Patients ≥35 years underwent double embryo transfer. Participants/materials, setting, methods Follitropin delta (Rekovelle, Ferring Pharmaceuticals) daily treatment consisted of a fixed dose individualised according to each patient’s initial AMH level (<15 pmol/L: 12 μg; ≥15 pmol/L: 0.19 to 0.10 μg/kg; min-max 6-12 μg) and body weight. Follitropin alfa (Gonal-f, Merck Serono) dose was 150 IU/day for the first five days with subsequent potential dose adjustments according to individual response. A GnRH antagonist protocol was applied. OHSS was classified based on Golan’s system. Main results and the role of chance The ongoing pregnancy rate was 31.3% with follitropin delta and 25.7% with follitropin alfa (adjusted difference 5.4% [95% CI: -0.2%; 11.0%]). The live birth rate was significantly higher at 31.3% with follitropin delta compared to 24.7% with follitropin alfa (adjusted difference 6.4% [95% CI: 0.9%; 11.9%]; p < 0.05). Live birth rates per age stratum were as follows for follitropin delta and follitropin alfa; <35 years: 31.0% versus 25.0%, 3537 years: 35.3% versus 26.7%, 38-40 years: 20.0% versus 14.3%. Early OHSS risk, evaluated as the incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions, was significantly (p < 0.01) reduced from 9.6% with follitropin alfa to 5.0% with follitropin delta. The number of oocytes was 10.0±6.1 with follitropin delta and 12.4±7.3 with follitropin alfa. Individualised follitropin delta dosing compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing resulted in 2 more oocytes (9.6±5.3 versus 7.6±3.5) in potential low responders (AMH <15 pmol/L) and 3 fewer oocytes (10.1±6.3 versus 13.8±7.5) in potential high responders (AMH ≥15 pmol/L). Among patients with AMH ≥15 pmol/L, excessive response occurred less frequently with individualised than conventional dosing (≥15 oocytes: 20.2% versus 39.1%; ≥20 oocytes: 6.7% versus 18.5%). Total gonadotropin dose was reduced from 109.9±32.9 μg with follitropin alfa to 77.5±24.4 μg with follitropin delta. Limitations, reasons for caution The trial only covered the clinical outcome of one treatment cycle with fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers. Wider implications of the findings The present trial implies that in addition to reducing the early OHSS risk, individualised dosing has the potential to improve the take-home baby rate in fresh cycles across all ages and with a lower gonadotropin consumption. The benefits in outcomes appear to be explained by the modulation of ovarian response. Trial registration number NCT03296527