42 An Analysis of Virtual Fracture Clinics in Orthopaedic Trauma in the UK During the Coronavirus Crisis

Aim Virtual Fracture Clinics (VFC) are advocated by new Orthopaedic (British Orthopaedic Association) and National Health Service (NHS) guidelines in the United Kingdom. We discuss benefits and limitations, reviewing the literature. As well as recommendations on introducing a VFC service during the Coronavirus pandemic and into the future. Method A narrative review identifying current literature on virtual fracture clinic outcomes when compared to traditional model fracture clinics in the UK. We identify 9 relevant publications related to VFC. Results The Glasgow Model initiated in 2011 has become the benchmark. Clinical efficiency can be improved, reducing the number of ED referrals seen in VFC by 15%-28% and face to face consultations by 65%. 33-60% of patients may be discharged after review in the VFC. Some studies have shown no negative impact on the Emergency Department (ED), the time to discharge was not increased. Patients satisfaction ranges from 91%-97% using a VFC service, and there may be cost saving benefits annually from £67,385-£212,705. Non-attendance may be reduced by 75% and there are educational opportunities for trainees. However, evidence is limited, 28% of patients prefer face-to-face consultations and not all have access to internet or email (72%). Conclusions We propose a pathway integrating the VFC model, whilst having Senior Orthopaedic decision makers available in ED, during normal working hours, to cope with the pandemic. Beyond the pandemic, evidence suggests the Glasgow model is viable for day-to-day practice.

360 The Impact COVID-19 Has Had on Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures: A Closed Loop Audit Demonstrating How Compliance to BOAST 11 Guidelines Has Changed in An Orthopaedic Department

Aim Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in the paediatric patient is a common orthopaedic injury. Resultantly, strict guidelines were created by the British Orthopaedic Association of Standards in Trauma 11 (BOAST 11). In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic, drastically affected the way medicine was practised. This audit aims to highlight, the extent to which compliance with BOAST 11 changed. Method Children with a supracondylar fracture of the humerus (Gartland 2 or 3) were included in this study. Standards from BOAST 11 were selected and the orthopaedic department were audited against these over a period of 2 years. After the first audit cycle, an information booklet was created and distributed to all doctors within the department. At the end of 2020, the department was re-audited, comparing pre-COVID results (2019) with COVID results (2020). Results Compliance improved within five BOAST 11 domains assessed on re-audit. With significant changes in neurovascular status being appropriately assessed and documented in clerking notes (improvement of 28%); and 2mm k-wire being used and documented in operation notes (improved by 23%). However, significant regression in results in patient’s being operated on within 24hours. Conclusions Global improvement of results during the national pandemic in 2020 demonstrates that our department did not compromise patient care despite limited resources but in fact strived for clinical excellence. The reason for a regression in compliance with regards to patients not being operated on within 24hours was likely due to protect paediatric patients from unnecessary stay in hospital, in a strategy to reduce COVID-19 transmission rates.

317 Audit of The Management of Ankle Fractures in The Emergency Department of Leighton Hospital

Background Ankle fractures are common presentations in the emergency department. The aim of treatment is to provide stability and restore alignment of the joint to as close as possible to the pre – injury state. The British Orthopaedic Association Audits Standards for Trauma (BOAST) guidelines provide clear recommendations for effective management of ankle fractures. Specific aspects of this guidelines that could be objectively assessed were selected for this audit to check if practices in the emergency department were meeting the national recommendations. Method Data was collected retrospectively. All patients with closed ankle fractures seen in the emergency department between 01/08/2020 and 31/08/2020 were included. Patients’ emergency department notes as well as electronic radiographic records were reviewed and analysed. Results There was 100% compliance rate for 3 of the domains assessed which include: clear documentations of mechanism of injury and clinical findings; documentation of co-morbidities of patients that can influence treatment and urgent performance of radiographs in clinically deformed ankles before manipulation.There was 75% compliance in performing and documentation of radiographs before transfer from the emergency. The worst domain was the re-assessment and documentation of neurovascular status post manipulation with only one reviewer out of five assessed documenting clearly after the process was completed. Conclusions Posters circulated in the department highlighting the findings of the audit. Furthermore, the LocSSIPs for reduction of ankle fractures was edited to include re-assessment of neurovascular status post manipulation.

191 Improving Consent and Legibility in Orthopaedic Surgery Through Introducing Pre-Populated Stickers

Aim Incomplete informed consent can lead to patient dissatisfaction and litigation.1 Time constraints, legibility, human error, limit completion of consent forms, putting surgeons and trusts at risk of litigation.2 The aim of this project was to assess legibility and completeness of handwritten consent forms, with the objective to improve legibility to 100% and risks listed to 100% of those endorsed by the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA).3 Method An initial baseline study in multiple hospitals across the UK identified 113 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasties. The consent forms were assessed for legibility and risks included, compared to those listed by the BOA. Pre-populated risks stickers were introduced in 1 district general hospital (DGH) and 2 cycles repeated again (62 patients identified). Results Overall, 35% of consent forms 1 were illegible; 100% of the time in the risks section. Mean number of risks missing was 2.34 and most frequently missed risk was ‘death’ (missing on 35.5% of consent forms). In the DGH that introduced stickers, consent forms were 100% legible and 100% compliant to the standards set by the BOA when the stickers were used. However, sticker use remained low; only used 20% of the time in the second cycle, marginally increased from the previous cycle (18%). Conclusions A high proportion of consent forms are not completed to BOA standards and are illegible. Pre-populated stickers could aid in achieving 100% legibility and 100% risk inclusion. The stickers will be implemented in other trusts and methods to increase compliance with sticker use will be trialled.

342 A Closed Loop Audit on The Quality of Documented Consent in Orthopaedic Procedures

Aim A thorough discussion of associated risks is essential when obtaining informed consent for any surgery. The consent form serves as a permanent record of the conversation and can have implications as a legal document in court. The aim of this audit was to assess the quality of documentation on consent forms for Orthopaedic procedures. Method Prospective data was collected from consent forms for patients undergoing 6 prespecified procedures and compared to British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines for consent. We analysed how many of the risks had been documented on the form, and whether the incidence of these risk was emphasised. The data was then collated, analysed and presented at a local trauma meeting. Templates for consent were printed and inserted into consent booklets on the ward to serve as a memory aid. Data was prospectively collected again to complete the audit cycle. Results Prior to the implementation of the consent templates, 8% of consent forms mentioned all possible complications, with 12% emphasising the incidence of the main risks. Post intervention, all significant risks were listed in 29% of forms, with 33% listing the risks in a logical order and emphasising their incidence. Conclusions The process of obtaining consent is a complex but crucial component of surgical practice, with the consent form serving as an important medicolegal document. This study shows that the use of pre-printed consent templates to aid memory can improve documentation and can be adapted and individualised accordingly for each patient.