720 Pringle Versus Selective Hepatic Vascular Exclusion in Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim Mortality and morbidity following hepatic resection is significantly affected by major intra-operative blood loss. Multiple techniques have been developed in an attempt to minimise blood loss by occluding hepatic inflow and outflow. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates whether selective hepatic vascular exclusion compared to a Pringle manoeuvre in hepatic resection reduces rates of morbidity and mortality. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines by screening EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, CENTRAL, SCOPUS and bibliographic reference lists for comparative studies meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria. Intra- and post-operative outcome measures were investigated. Pooled odds ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either fixed- or random-effects models. Results Five studies were identified including two randomized controlled trials and three observational studies reporting a total of 2,198 patients. Data synthesis showed significantly decreased rates of mortality, overall complications, patients requiring blood transfusion, air embolism, warm ischaemia time, liver failure and multi-organ failure when performing SHVE compared to a Pringle manoeuvre. Rates of hepatic vein rupture and post-operative haemorrhage remained the same. Performing SHVE resulted in a significantly longer operation time. Conclusions Performing SHVE in major hepatectomy may result in reduced rates of morbidity and mortality when compared to a Pringle manoeuvre, although may prolong operating time. The results of this meta-analysis are based on a few high-quality studies where tumours were adjacent to major vessels. Further RCTs are required to validate these results and determine the best technique for hepatic vascular control in this patient cohort.

Influence of interapplicator distance on multibipolar radiofrequency ablation during physiological and interrupted liver perfusion in an in vivo porcine model

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative treatment option for early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Vascular inflow occlusion to the liver (Pringle manoeuvre) and multibipolar RFA (mbRFA) represent possibilities to generate large ablations. This study evaluated the impact of different interapplicator distances and a Pringle manoeuvre on ablation area and geometry of mbRFA. 24 mbRFA were planned in porcine livers in vivo. Test series with continuous blood flow had an interapplicator distance of 20 mm and 15 mm, respectively. For a Pringle manoeuvre, interapplicator distance was predefined at 20 mm. After liver dissection, ablation area and geometry were analysed macroscopically and histologically. Confluent and homogenous ablations could be achieved with a Pringle manoeuvre and an interapplicator distance of 15 mm with sustained hepatic blood flow. Ablation geometry was inhomogeneous with an applicator distance of 20 mm with physiological liver perfusion. A Pringle manoeuvre led to a fourfold increase in ablation area in comparison to sustained hepatic blood flow (p < 0.001). Interapplicator distance affects ablation geometry of mbRFA. Strict adherence to the planned applicator distance is advisable under continuous blood flow. The application of a Pringle manoeuvre should be considered when compliance with the interapplicator distance cannot be guaranteed.