diagnostic injection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Ilker Solmaz ◽  
Aydan Orscelik ◽  
Ozlem Koroglu

BACKGROUND: Prolotherapy (PrT) is an increasingly popular regenerative injection treatment for the management of musculoskeletal injuries. The diagnostic injection is a method for selecting suitable patients to apply PrT using subcutaneous 5% dextrose solution. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess the PrT usage and modifications in the treatment of chronic low back pain and lumbar disc herniation and to define diagnostic injection procedure for PrT. METHOD: Two thousand three hundred and eighty-two patients with low back pain or lumbar disc herniation were evaluated at the Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practice Center in Ankara, Turkey. Six hundred fifty-four patients were included in the study. Diagnostic injections were performed on all patients who were thought to be eligible candidates for PrT indications. A 4-or-6 week interval was allowed between treatment sessions. RESULTS: Xix hundred and fifty-four patient treatments were completed. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores decreased to 5.1 ± 1.4 while 7.2 ± 1.1 before the diagnostic injection (p< 000.1). The VAS scores decreased from 7.2 ± 1.1 before the treatment to 0.9 ± 0.9 after 52 weeks of the treatment (p< 000.1). Thirty-four patients’ treatments resulted in poor clinical results (5.2%), and 620 of the patients’ pain improved (94.8%). CONCLUSION: PrT can be regarded as a safe way of providing a meaningful improvement in pain and musculoskeletal function compared to the initial status. Diagnostic injection is an easy way to eliminate patients and may become a favorite treatment modality. 5% dextrose is a more simple and painless solution for PrT and also has a high success.


2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Nirenberg ◽  
Elizabeth A. Ansert

Denervation has been a recommended treatment option for a range of pathologies, including relief from chronic pain; however, literature discussing complete denervation of the distal saphenous nerve for foot pain has not been found. A case report of surgical decompression for compartment syndrome resulting in chronic, debilitating foot pain that was successfully alleviated by complete saphenous nerve denervation is presented. The predominant area of the patient's pain was on the medial aspect of the foot, where a thickened scar from a decompression fasciotomy was noted. The patient's initial pain score was reported as 10 of 10, with no relief from numerous conservative treatments attempted over an 11-year period. After a diagnostic injection of a local anesthetic to the distal saphenous nerve provided the patient with immediate, temporary relief, complete denervation of the distal saphenous nerve was performed. The patient reported significant pain reduction shortly after the procedure. This case suggests that physicians should be cognizant of the saphenous nerve and its branches, as well as its variable pathways during surgery. In addition, practitioners should be aware of its influence as a progenitor of pain in the foot that may require denervation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 2050313X2091922
Author(s):  
Jorge Javier Del Vecchio ◽  
Lucas Nicolás Chemes ◽  
Luciano Bertollotti ◽  
Mauricio Esteban Ghioldi ◽  
Eric Daniel Dealbera ◽  
...  

We present the case of a 43-year-old boy who presented with progressive pain as a result of history of lateral avascular necrosis of the talus secondary to traumatic open ankle luxation 20 years ago. Conservative treatment (12-month period) prior to surgery failed. It consisted of physiokinetic treatment, insoles and analgesic medication. A diagnostic injection was used in the ankle (positive) and subtalar joint (negative) in order to recognize origin of pain. Hemilateral avascular necrosis of the talus is rare. There are no prior reported cases of the use of hemi-implants. This case highlights the potential use of a patient-specific three-dimensional printed Ti6Al4V prosthesis presented in a complex scenario.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 1209-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn G. Shi ◽  
Meredith A. Williams ◽  
Joseph L. Whalen ◽  
Benjamin K. Wilke ◽  
Jonathan C. Kraus

Background: Dorsal pain from osteoarthritic midfoot joints is thought to be relayed by branches of the medial and lateral plantar, sural, saphenous, and deep peroneal nerves (DPN). However, there is no consensus on the actual number or pathways of the nervous branches for midfoot joint capsular innervation. This study examined the DPN’s terminal branches at the midfoot joint capsules through anatomic dissection and confirmation of their significance in a clinical case series of patients with midfoot pain relief after DPN block. Methods: Eleven cadaveric lower leg specimens, 6 left and 5 right, were dissected using operative loupe magnification. We preserved the terminal branches and recorded their paths and branching patterns. Joint capsular innervations were individually noted. To confirm our hypothesis of significant dorsal midfoot joint capsular innervation by the DPN, we also performed an institutional review board–approved retrospective chart review of 37 patients with painful dorsal midfoot osteoarthritis who underwent diagnostic local anesthetic injection block of the DPN. The percentage of temporary pain relief after the injection was recorded. Results: Terminal innervation of the DPN branches showed distribution of the second and third tarsometatarsal joints in all specimens. Inconsistent innervation of the naviculocuneiform (9/11), fourth (7/11), first (6/11), and fifth (4/11) tarsometatarsal and calcaneocuboid joints (1/11) were observed. The retrospective review of pain relief in patients with dorsal midfoot pain due to arthritis after diagnostic injection demonstrated a mean of 92.1% improvement. Conclusion: Innervation of the dorsal midfoot joint capsule appears to follow a consistent distribution across 3 joints: second and third tarsometatarsal joints and the naviculocuneiform joint. Acute relief of dorsal midfoot arthritic pain after diagnostic injection suggests that dorsal midfoot nociceptive pain is at least partly transmitted by the DPN. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey I. Watson ◽  
Sydney C. Karnovsky ◽  
David S. Levine ◽  
Mark C. Drakos

Background: Stenosing peroneal tenosynovitis (SPT) is an uncommon entity that is equally difficult to diagnose. We evaluated our outcomes with a local anesthetic diagnostic injection followed by surgical release of the sheath and calcaneal exostectomy. Methods: Eleven patients diagnosed with SPT underwent surgery between 2006 and 2014. Upon initial presentation, all patients reported a persistent history of pain along the ankle. Ultrasound-guided injections of anesthetics were administered into the peroneal tendon sheath to confirm the diagnosis. In patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SPT, we proceeded with surgical intervention with release of the peroneal tendon sheath and debridement of the calcaneal exostosis. Retrospective chart review was performed, and functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). FAOS results were collected pre- and postoperatively and were successfully obtained at 1 year or greater. Results: Of these patients, all showed significant improvements ( P < .05) in 4 of 5 categories of the FAOS (pain, daily activities, sports activities, and quality of life). Conclusion: We present a case series in which the peroneal tendon sheath was diagnostically injected with anesthetic to confirm a diagnosis of SPT. In each of these cases, symptomatic improvement was obtained following the injection. With the fact that many of these patients had advanced imaging denoting no significant tears, we believe that this diagnostic injection is paramount for the success of surgical outcome. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.


PM&R ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. S299
Author(s):  
Justice Otchere ◽  
Donald L. Hamby ◽  
Shawn M. Teran ◽  
Sarah E. Humbert

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 1592-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron J. Krych ◽  
Paul L. Sousa ◽  
Alexander H. King ◽  
William M. Engasser ◽  
Bruce A. Levy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document