Mad1’s ability to interact with Mad2 is essential to regulate and monitor meiotic synapsis in C. elegans

Meiotic homolog synapsis is essential to ensure accurate segregation of chromosomes during meiosis. In C. elegans, proper regulation of synapsis and a checkpoint that monitors synapsis relies on the spindle checkpoint components, Mad1 and Mad2, and Pairing Centers (PCs), cis-acting loci that interact with the nuclear envelope to mobilize chromosomes within the nucleus. Here, we test what specific functions of Mad1 and Mad2 are required to regulate and monitor synapsis. We find that a mutation that prevents Mad1’s localization to the nuclear periphery abolishes the synapsis checkpoint but has no effect on Mad2’s localization to the nuclear periphery or synapsis. By contrast, a mutation that prevents Mad1’s interaction with Mad2 abolishes the synapsis checkpoint, delays synapsis and fails to localize Mad2 to the nuclear periphery. These data indicate that Mad1’s primary role in regulating synapsis is through control of Mad2 and that Mad2 can bind other factors at the nuclear periphery. We also tested whether Mad2’s ability to adopt a specific conformation associated with its activity during spindle checkpoint function is required for its role in meiosis. A mutation that prevents Mad2 from adopting its active conformer fails to localize to the nuclear periphery, abolishes the synapsis checkpoint and exhibits substantial defects in meiotic synapsis. Thus, Mad2, and its regulation by Mad1, is an important regulator of meiotic synapsis in C. elegans.

Ubc1 turnover contributes to the spindle assembly checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The spindle assembly checkpoint protects the integrity of the genome by ensuring that chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindle before they are segregated during anaphase. Activation of the spindle checkpoint results in inhibition of the Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that triggers the metaphase-anaphase transition. Here we show that levels of Ubc1, an E2 enzyme that functions in complex with the APC, modulate the response to spindle checkpoint activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Overexpression of Ubc1 increased resistance to microtubule poisons, whereas Ubc1 shut-off sensitized cells. We also found that Ubc1 levels are regulated by the spindle checkpoint. Checkpoint activation or direct APC inhibition led to a decrease in Ubc1 levels, charging and half-life. Additionally, stabilization of Ubc1 prevented its downregulation by the spindle checkpoint and increased resistance to checkpoint-activating drugs. These results suggest that downregulation of Ubc1 in response to spindle checkpoint signaling is necessary for a robust cell cycle arrest.

Mad1’s ability to interact with Mad2 is essential to regulate and monitor meiotic synapsis in C. elegans

Meiotic homolog synapsis is essential to ensure accurate segregation of chromosomes during meiosis. In C. elegans , synapsis and a checkpoint that monitors synapsis relies on the spindle checkpoint components, Mad1 and Mad2, and Pairing Centers (PCs), cis-acting loci that interact with the nuclear envelope to mobilize chromosomes within the nucleus. Here, we show that mutations in some spindle checkpoint mutants affect PC movement early in meiotic prophase, consistent with a link between PC mobility and the regulation of synapsis. Further, we test what specific functions of Mad1 and Mad2 are required to regulate and monitor synapsis. We find that a mutation that abrogates Mad1’s localization to the nuclear periphery abolishes the synapsis checkpoint but has no effect on Mad2’s localization to the nuclear periphery or synapsis. By contrast, a mutation that prevents Mad1’s interaction with Mad2 abolishes the synapsis checkpoint, delays synapsis and fails to localize Mad2 to the nuclear periphery. These data indicate that Mad1’s primary role in regulating synapsis is through control of Mad2 and that Mad2 can bind other factors at the nuclear periphery. We also tested whether Mad2’s ability to adopt a specific conformation associated with its activity during spindle checkpoint function is required for its role in meiosis. A mutation that prevents Mad2 from adopting its active conformer fails to localize to the nuclear periphery, abolishes the synapsis checkpoint and exhibits substantial defects in meiotic synapsis. Thus, Mad2, and its regulation by Mad1, is a major regulator of meiotic synapsis in C. elegans .

Mps1 promotes poleward chromosome movements in meiotic prometaphase

Mps1 is a kinase that regulates several steps in mitosis and meiosis. Mps1 is essential for the spindle checkpoint and helps stabilize attachment of kinetochores to microtubules. Here we show that following microtubule attachment, Mps1 promotes microtubule depolymerization to trigger migration of the chromosome toward the spindle pole.

Analysis of a Mad2 homolog in Trypanosoma brucei provides possible hints on the origin of the spindle checkpoint

The spindle checkpoint is a surveillance mechanism that ensures accurate nuclear DNA segregation in eukaryotes. It does so by delaying the onset of anaphase until all kinetochores have established proper attachments to spindle microtubules. The evolutionary origin of the spindle checkpoint remains unclear. The flagellated kinetoplastid parasite Trypanosoma brucei has a nucleus that contains the nuclear genome and a kinetoplast that contains the mitochondrial genome. The kinetoplast is physically linked to the basal body of the flagellum and its segregation is driven by the movement of basal bodies. While there is no strong evidence that T. brucei possesses a functional spindle checkpoint, it has been suggested that initiation of cytokinesis may be linked to the completion of kinetoplast segregation or basal body separation in this organism. Interestingly, the only identifiable spindle checkpoint component TbMad2 localizes at the basal body area. Here, I report identification of proteins that co-purified with TbMad2. One protein, which I propose to call TbMBP65, localizes at the basal body area and has a putative Mad2-interacting motif. Interestingly, 26S proteasome subunits also co-purified with TbMad2, raising a possibility that TbMad2 might regulate proteasome activity to regulate or monitor the segregation of basal bodies. I speculate that such a function might represent a prototype of the spindle checkpoint. I also show that TbAUK3, one of the three Aurora kinase homologs in T. brucei, localizes at the basal body area from late G1 until the time of kinetoplast separation. Immunoprecipitation of TbAUK3 identified an uncharacterized protein (termed TbABP79) that has a similar localization pattern as TbAUK3. These findings provide a starting point to reveal the function of TbMad2 and TbAUK3 as well as the origin of the spindle checkpoint.

The conserved AAA-ATPase PCH-2 TRIP13 regulates spindle checkpoint strength

The length of the cell cycle delay imposed by the spindle checkpoint, also referred to as the spindle checkpoint strength, is controlled by the number of unattached kinetochores, cell volume, and cell fate. We show that PCH-2, a highly conserved AAA-ATPase, controls checkpoint strength during early embryogenesis in C. elegans.

The C-terminal helix of BubR1 is essential for CENP-E-dependent chromosome alignment

ABSTRACTDuring cell division, misaligned chromosomes are captured and aligned by motors before their segregation. The CENP-E motor is recruited to polar unattached kinetochores to facilitate chromosome alignment. The spindle checkpoint protein BubR1 (also known as BUB1B) has been reported as a CENP-E interacting partner, but the extent to which BubR1 contributes to CENP-E localization at kinetochores has remained controversial. Here we define the molecular determinants that specify the interaction between BubR1 and CENP-E. The basic C-terminal helix of BubR1 is necessary but not sufficient for CENP-E interaction, and a minimal key acidic patch on the kinetochore-targeting domain of CENP-E is also essential. We then demonstrate that BubR1 is required for the recruitment of CENP-E to kinetochores to facilitate chromosome alignment. This BubR1–CENP-E axis is critical for alignment of chromosomes that have failed to congress through other pathways and recapitulates the major known function of CENP-E. Overall, our studies define the molecular basis and the function for CENP-E recruitment to BubR1 at kinetochores during mammalian mitosis.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

Rashomon at the kinetochore: Function(s) of the Mad1–cyclin B1 complex

In the film Rashomon, four witnesses describe seemingly contradictory views of one event. In a recent analogy, an interaction between the master mitotic regulator cyclin B1 and the spindle checkpoint component Mad1 was independently described by three groups who propose strikingly different functions for this interaction. Here, we summarize their findings and present a perspective on reconciling the different views.