acute aortic disease
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 682-682
Author(s):  
Jamie Palmer ◽  
Matthew Fairchild ◽  
Zain Alam ◽  
Dominique Gelmann ◽  
Emily Engelbrecht-Wiggans ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Rubino ◽  
Sofia Capocci ◽  
Leonardo Portolan ◽  
Alessia Gambaro ◽  
Michele Pighi ◽  
...  

Abstract Methods and results A 41-year-old black man complaining of severe oppressive chest pain radiated to the back presented to our accident & emergency department (A&E). His symptoms started few days before his hospital admission. Past medical history was remarkable for arterial hypertension in medical therapy and microdrepanocytosis. In A&E, the patient’s physical examination and vital signs were normal, he was normotensive, apyretic with normal oxygen saturation. The ECG showed ST elevation in anterior and lateral leads. Because of his history of arterial hypertension, and the severe chest pain irradiated to the back, an angio-CT was indicated at first. The CT ruled out acute aortic disease. Excluded the acute aortic disease, the patient underwent an urgent coronary angiography. No coronary stenosis was found. Therefore, the patient was admitted in cardiac intensive care unit. The blood test showed an elevation of high sensitive cardiac troponin T (cTnT peak 3093 ng/L) and inflammatory index (leukocytosis 13.65 109/l and protein C reactive peak 347 mg/L). An in-depth anamnestic collection revealed fever with respiratory symptoms about 2 weeks before. The echocardiography demonstrated left ventricular (LV) dysfunction with increased ventricular wall thickness and mild pericardial effusion. No LV outflow tract obstruction was found. A provisional diagnosis of peri-myocarditis was made. During hospitalization, anti-remodelling cardiac therapy was introduced and up titrated. To confirm the provisional diagnosis, a Gadolinium cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) was performed, and it revealed myocardial oedema on basal anterior interventricular septum and multiple areas of late gadolinium enhancement with subepicardial pattern. Moreover, severe LV hypertrophy was confirmed (interventricular septum 19 mm, inferior wall 17 mm). This pattern was consistent to the diagnosis of peri-myocarditis on a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Main infectious causes of peri-myocarditis were investigated, but the results were inconclusive. Unfortunately, genetic test results are still not available. Patient was discharged with recovered LV systolic function and free of symptoms on optimal medical therapy; no ventricular arrhythmias was detected during hospitalization. HCM risk sudden cardiac death (SCD) was lower than 4%. Conclusions Peri-myocarditis can mimic symptoms of an acute coronary syndrome. Furthermore, the inflammation of cardiac muscle and the subsequent interstitial oedema may cause an increase in LV wall thickness. In this setting, the diagnosis of an underlying cardiomyopathy is challenging. This interesting and unusual case highlights the relevance of an accurate diagnostic work up to deliver good clinical practice. In particular, Gadolinium CMR is of paramount importance in this setting.


2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. e107
Author(s):  
Charles DeCarlo ◽  
Robert Lancaster ◽  
Jahan Mohebali ◽  
W. Darrin Clouse ◽  
Mark F. Conrad ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyu Chul Shin ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
Joon Min Park ◽  
Hyun-Chel Joo ◽  
Young-Guk Ko ◽  
...  

Open Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Di Cesare ◽  
Alessandra Splendiani ◽  
Antonio Barile ◽  
Ettore Squillaci ◽  
Annamaria Di Cesare ◽  
...  

AbstractAt present time, both CT and MRI are valuable techniques in the study of the thoracic aorta. Nowadays, CT represents the most widely employed technique for the study of the thoracic aorta. The new generation CTs show sensitivities up to 100% and specificities of 98-99%. Sixteen and wider row detectors provide isotropic pixels, mandatory for the ineludible longitudinal reconstruction. The main limits are related to the X-ray dose expoure and the use of iodinated contrast media. MRI has great potential in the study of the thoracic aorta. Nevertheless, if compared to CT, acquisition times remain longer and movement artifact susceptibility higher. The main MRI disadvantages are claustrophobia, presence of ferromagnetic implants, pacemakers, longer acquisition times with respect to CT, inability to use contrast media in cases of renal insufficiency, lower spatial resolution and less availability than CT. CT is preferred in the acute aortic disease. Nevertheless, since it requires iodinated contrast media and X-ray exposure, it may be adequately replaced by MRI in the follow up of aortic diseases. The main limitation of MRI, however, is related to the scarce visibility of stents and calcifications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document