scholarly journals IP067. Outcomes of Surgeon-Modified Fenestrated Endografts in the Treatment of High-Risk and Acute Aortic Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. e107
Author(s):  
Charles DeCarlo ◽  
Robert Lancaster ◽  
Jahan Mohebali ◽  
W. Darrin Clouse ◽  
Mark F. Conrad ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyu Chul Shin ◽  
Hye Sun Lee ◽  
Joon Min Park ◽  
Hyun-Chel Joo ◽  
Young-Guk Ko ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 740-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schillinger ◽  
Hans Domanovits ◽  
Keywan Bayegan ◽  
Thomas Hölzenbein ◽  
Martin Grabenwöger ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. S76
Author(s):  
SO Hwang ◽  
KH Lee ◽  
ES Hong ◽  
BJ Oh ◽  
JH Cho ◽  
...  

Resuscitation ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Wagner ◽  
Hans Domanovits ◽  
Michael Holzer ◽  
Julia Kofler ◽  
Martin Röggla ◽  
...  

Open Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Di Cesare ◽  
Alessandra Splendiani ◽  
Antonio Barile ◽  
Ettore Squillaci ◽  
Annamaria Di Cesare ◽  
...  

AbstractAt present time, both CT and MRI are valuable techniques in the study of the thoracic aorta. Nowadays, CT represents the most widely employed technique for the study of the thoracic aorta. The new generation CTs show sensitivities up to 100% and specificities of 98-99%. Sixteen and wider row detectors provide isotropic pixels, mandatory for the ineludible longitudinal reconstruction. The main limits are related to the X-ray dose expoure and the use of iodinated contrast media. MRI has great potential in the study of the thoracic aorta. Nevertheless, if compared to CT, acquisition times remain longer and movement artifact susceptibility higher. The main MRI disadvantages are claustrophobia, presence of ferromagnetic implants, pacemakers, longer acquisition times with respect to CT, inability to use contrast media in cases of renal insufficiency, lower spatial resolution and less availability than CT. CT is preferred in the acute aortic disease. Nevertheless, since it requires iodinated contrast media and X-ray exposure, it may be adequately replaced by MRI in the follow up of aortic diseases. The main limitation of MRI, however, is related to the scarce visibility of stents and calcifications.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 32-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Nicolini ◽  
Antonella Vezzani ◽  
Francesco Corradi ◽  
Riccardo Gherli ◽  
Filippo Benassi ◽  
...  

Background Gender-related biases in outcomes after thoracic aortic surgery are an important factor to consider in the prevention of potential complications related to aortic diseases and in the analysis of surgical results. Methods The aim of this study is to provide an up-to-date review of gender-related differences in the epidemiology, specific risk factors, outcome, and screening and prevention programmes in aortic aneurysms. Results Female patients affected by aortic disease still have worse outcomes and higher early and late mortality than men. It is difficult to plan new specific strategies to improve outcomes in women undergoing major aortic surgery, given that the true explanations for their poorer outcomes are as yet not clearly identified. Some authors recommend further investigation of hormonal or molecular explanations for the sex differences in aortic disease. Others stress the need for quality improvement projects to quantify the preoperative risk in high-risk populations using non-invasive tests such as cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Conclusions The treatment of patients classified as high risk could thus be optimised before surgery becomes necessary by means of numerous strategies, such as the administration of high-dose statin therapy, antiplatelet treatment, optimal control of hypertension, lifestyle improvement with smoking cessation, weight loss and careful control of diabetes. Future efforts are needed to understand better the gender differences in the diagnosis, management and outcome of aortic aneurysm disease, and for appropriate and modern management of female patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 682-682
Author(s):  
Jamie Palmer ◽  
Matthew Fairchild ◽  
Zain Alam ◽  
Dominique Gelmann ◽  
Emily Engelbrecht-Wiggans ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document