apalone spinifera
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

38
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayhan Ostovar ◽  
Gabriel Wolff ◽  
David Dockery ◽  
Ulrich Hoensch ◽  
Mike Ruggles ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 376 (1833) ◽  
pp. 20200101
Author(s):  
Basanta Bista ◽  
Zhiqiang Wu ◽  
Robert Literman ◽  
Nicole Valenzuela

Sex chromosome dosage compensation (SCDC) overcomes gene-dose imbalances that disturb transcriptional networks, as when ZW females or XY males are hemizygous for Z/X genes. Mounting data from non-model organisms reveal diverse SCDC mechanisms, yet their evolution remains obscure, because most informative lineages with variable sex chromosomes are unstudied. Here, we discovered SCDC in turtles and an unprecedented thermosensitive SCDC in eukaryotes. We contrasted RNA-seq expression of Z-genes, their autosomal orthologues, and control autosomal genes in Apalone spinifera (ZZ/ZW) and Chrysemys picta turtles with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) (proxy for ancestral expression). This approach disentangled chromosomal context effects on Z-linked and autosomal expression, from lineage effects owing to selection or drift. Embryonic Apalone SCDC is tissue- and age-dependent, regulated gene-by-gene, complete in females via Z-upregulation in both sexes (Type IV) but partial and environmentally plastic via Z-downregulation in males (accentuated at colder temperature), present in female hatchlings and a weakly suggestive in adult liver (Type I). Results indicate that embryonic SCDC evolved with/after sex chromosomes in Apalone 's family Tryonichidae, while co-opting Z-gene upregulation present in the TSD ancestor. Notably, Apalone 's SCDC resembles pygmy snake's, and differs from the full-SCDC of Anolis lizards who share homologous sex chromosomes (XY), advancing our understanding of how XX/XY and ZZ/ZW systems compensate gene-dose imbalance. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Challenging the paradigm in sex chromosome evolution: empirical and theoretical insights with a focus on vertebrates (Part II)’.


Genetica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Yu ◽  
Xiaoli Yang ◽  
Weishang Zhou ◽  
Wentao Yang ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-121
Author(s):  
Christina M. Davy ◽  
Juliana Skuza ◽  
Amelia K. Whitear

We captured 46 Spiny Softshells (Apalone spinifera) during a mark–recapture study on Lake Erie (2012–2015). Six (13%) exhibited circular scars consistent with the bites of small parasitic lampreys. Two species of parasitic lampreys occur in Lake Erie: the invasive Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) and the native Silver Lamprey (Ichthyostomyzon unicuspis). The scars showed only the marks of the putative teeth surrounding the suctorial mouth, preventing identification based on the position of the supraoral teeth and suggesting that lampreys are rapidly dislodged from the turtles. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence of lampreys biting freshwater turtles.


Author(s):  
Stephane Lair ◽  
Émilie L. Couture ◽  
Shannon T. Ferrell ◽  
Marion Desmarchelier ◽  
Louis Lazure

2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 275
Author(s):  
Shannon M Mahoney ◽  
Peter V Lindeman

Populations of the Spiny Softshell (Apalone spinifera) in the Great Lakes are of conservation concern despite being secure elsewhere in their North American range. We examined the relative abundance of Spiny Softshells among the turtle fauna at Presque Isle, a peninsula on the Pennsylvania shoreline of Lake Erie. We also compared male and female diets to determine the presence of invasive Zebra and Quagga Mussels (Dreissena spp.). The Spiny Softshell was the fifth most common of six turtle species captured (2% of captures). in the peninsula’s largest bay there was a significant increase in capture rate and proportion of Spiny Softshell captures in late summer (5% of five species of turtles) compared to early summer (3% of all turtles). Recapture was considerably lower for Spiny Softshells (5%) than for four other turtle species suggesting that either its relative abundance is higher than trapping data indicate or that they are a mobile species with less habitat fidelity than other residents. Prey from fecal samples were quantified using an index of Relative importance (iRi). Males (n = 26) ate primarily unidentified insects (iRi = 59), followed by algal stalks (iRi = 35) and caddisfly larvae (iRi = 4). Females (n = 5) ate primarily algal stalks (iRi = 54), followed by crayfish (iRi = 22) and fish (iRi = 19). only two turtles, one male and one female, passedZebra and Quagga Mussels in fecal samples, thus Spiny Softshells do not appear to make significant use of these invasive molluscs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Émilie L. Couture ◽  
Shannon T. Ferrell ◽  
Marion Desmarchelier ◽  
Louis Lazure ◽  
Stéphane Lair

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document