Endoscopic management of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas

Duodenal polyps are found in 0.1 % to 0.8 % of all upper endoscopies. Duodenal adenomas account for 10 % to 20 % of these lesions. They can be sporadic or occur in the setting of a hereditary predisposition syndrome, mainly familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy is the cornerstone of management of duodenal adenomas, allowing for diagnosis and treatment, primarily by endoscopic mucosal resection. The endoscopic treatment of duodenal adenomas has a high morbidity, reaching 15 % in a prospective study, consisting of bleeding and perforations, and should therefore be performed in expert centers. The local recurrence rate ranges from 9 % to 37 %, and is maximal for piecemeal resections of lesions > 20 mm. Surgical resection of the duodenum is flawed with major morbidity and considered a rescue procedure in cases of endoscopic treatment failures or severe endoscopic complications such as duodenal perforations. In this paper, we review the existing evidence on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.

Management of scope-induced type I duodenal perforations: Over-the-scope clip versus surgery

Background Scope-induced duodenal perforation is a life-threatening complication and surgery remains the standard of care. With the advent of over-the-scope clip (OTSC), scope-induced perforations are increasingly managed conservatively, though there is no study comparing this form of non-surgical treatment with surgery. We aimed to compare OTSC and surgery in the management of scope-induced perforation of the duodenum. Methods We retrospectively collected data of scope-induced duodenal perforation patients. Perforations identified and treated within 24 h of procedure were analyzed. Factors analyzed were spectrum, etiology, baseline parameters, perforation size, outcome, comorbidities, and duration of hospital stay. Results A total of 25 patients had type I duodenal perforations, out of whom five were excluded due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Of the twenty, eight were treated with OTSC placement while the rest underwent surgery. Age was comparable and the majority were females. Baseline parameters and comorbidities were similar in both the groups. The median size of perforation was 1.5 cm in both the OTSC group and the surgical group. All patients were treated with standard of care according to institutional protocols. Patients in the OTSC group were started orally after 48 h of OTSC placement, while in the surgery group median time to oral intake was 7 days. Two patients in the surgical group died while there was no mortality in the OTSC group (p = 0.48). Median hospital stay was shorter in the OTSC group (2 days vs. 22 days, p = 0.003). Conclusions OTSC is a feasible and better option in type I duodenal perforations with a shorter hospital stay.

Endoscopic Closure of an Acute Duodenal Perforation Occurring during Endoscopic Ultrasound Using Endoclips and Polyglycolic Acid Sheets with Fibrin Glue

Acute duodenal perforation during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a serious complication. The conventional endoscopic treatment for duodenal perforations such as endoscopic clipping is unsatisfactory; recently, the effectiveness of over-the-scope clipping (OTSC) has been reported. A 91-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with the chief complaint of jaundice. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 2-cm mass in the pancreatic head; we planned EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. During exploration for a puncture route from the duodenal bulb using a linear echoendoscope under carbon dioxide insufflation, the duodenal lumen was suddenly filled with blood. A perforation <15 mm was identified in the superior duodenal horn. We attempted an endoscopic closure with multiple endoclips but could not completely close the perforation site. Strips of bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets were placed over the gaps between the endoclips with biopsy forceps and fixed in place with fibrin glue, completely covering the perforation site. Two days after the procedure, the perforation site had closed. Nine days later, endoscopic biliary stenting was performed. The patient was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer through bile cytology, and the optimal supportive care for her age was selected. Endoscopic tissue shielding with PGA sheets and fibrin glue is increasingly being reported for use during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. In this case, surgery was avoided due to successful endoscopic treatment using endoclips and PGA sheets with fibrin glue without OTSC. This method may be useful for repairing acute duodenal perforations during EUS and should therefore be known to pancreatobiliary endoscopists.

Spontaneous fistulisation of the common bile duct after transection by gunshot

A 35-year-old man presented with a gunshot wound to his abdomen via his lower chest. Initial laparotomy did not identify any perforation or contamination. On day 3, a laparotomy under the hepatobiliary service discovered a gastric perforation, two lateral duodenal perforations and a complete transection of the common bile duct, presumably delayed perforation from the shockwave injury produced by the bullet. Contamination and haemodynamic instability precluded immediate reconstruction, and abdominal drains and external biliary drainage were established. High-volume duodenal fistula was managed with slow withdrawal of drains, and inadvertent dislodgement of the biliary drain in an outpatient setting resulted in spontaneous fistulisation of the bile duct to the lateral duodenal wall, with creation of a neo-bile duct. The patient remains well more than 1 year later, without external drainage despite no surgical reconstruction.

Aetiological Pattern of Gastrointestinal Perforations: A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction: Peritonitis secondary to gastrointestinal perforation is one of the commonest surgical emergencies encountered all over the world. This study was done to highlight the spectrum of perforation peritonitis encountered in surgery unit of Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Method: It was observational prospective of 100 cases of perforation peritonitis treated in our hospital. All cases of perforative peritonitis whether spontaneous, infective or neoplastic pathology were included in this study. Results: The maximum numbers of patients were in age group between 31 to 40 years (39 %) with mean age 35 years. Male female ratio was 9:1. The most common aetiology of perforation peritonitis was peptic ulcer disease (73%) followed by enteric fever (12%), appendicitis (10%), tuberculosis (3%) and malignancy (2%). The most common sites of perforation were in descending order of frequency - first part of the duodenum (65%), terminal ileum (12%), appendix (10%), gastric antrum (9%), jejunum (3%) and rectum (1%). Abdominal pain (100%) and vomiting (81%) were the most common symptoms while tachycardia (96%), muscle guard and rigidity (100%) were the common signs. Approximately 15-20% presented late with features of shock. Mortality rate was 2% and was significantly high in patients coming hospital late. Conclusion: Gastrointestinal perforations are one of the most common surgical emergencies. Duodenal perforations are most common. Ileal perforations secondary to enteric fever have highest morbidity. Early recognition and timely appropriate intervention is very important in reducing morbidity and mortality. J Dhaka Medical College, Vol. 29, No.2, October, 2020, Page 106-109

Intestinal perforation involving the Dacron cuff of nephrostomy tubes following subcutaneous ureteral bypass system implantation for ureteral obstructions in two cats

Case summary This case report describes two cats that had subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) systems implanted and subsequently developed duodenal perforations and septic peritonitis associated with the Dacron cuff of the nephrostomy tube. One cat recovered following surgical explantation of the SUB system with intestinal resection and anastomosis of the perforated small intestine, and – at the time of writing – is still alive. The other cat was humanely euthanased intraoperatively at the owner’s request owing to its perceived prognosis. Relevance and novel information To our knowledge this is the first time this complication has been reported following SUB device placement.

DUODENAL ULCER PERFPRATION - A CLINICAL STUDY IN A TERTIARY HEALTH CARE SET UP.

BACKGROUND - Peptic ulcer disease though having multifactorial etiologies, out of which H.pyroli infection and NSAIDs use are leading causes of duodenal perforation. Gastro-duodenal perforations are common in surgical practice. Acute perforations of duodenum are estimated to occur in 2-10% of patients with ulcers. MATERIALS AND METHODS - This a retrospective study ( done between August 2019 to August 2020), where 100 patients with duodenal ulcer perforation were enrolled, analyzed and compared in Department of General Surgery, Veer Surendra Sai Institute of Medical Science And Research (VIMSAR) , Burla, Sambalpur. RESULTS – More common in 40-59 years age group, male and lower socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION-Duodenal ulcer perforation is one of the most common acute abdominal emergencies.

Laparoscopic Repair of Near Complete Traumatic Duodenal Transaction in an eight years old Child. A Case report

: Traumatic duodenal perforation is a serious injury and is a result of major trauma and insult to the body. The management is difficult due to associated injuries and these children often need major resuscitation. The standard surgical treatment of traumatic duodenal perforation is laparotomy and repair of duodenal perforation. In children, laparoscopic repair of duodenal perforation is reported in only a few cases. A repair of a near-complete duodenal transaction is not reported in the pediatric population. Herein, we report a case of an eight years old child who had a road traffic accident, and sustained multiple injuries and duodenal perforation, as confirmed by radiological evaluation including CT abdomen. The child was resuscitated, and later laparoscopy was performed, which showed gross bruising of the abdominal wall and a near-complete transaction at the level of 3rd part of the duodenum. Laparoscopic repair of the duodenum was performed using interrupted polyglycolic sutures. The child had a smooth post-op recovery and was discharged home in stable condition. At one-year follow-up, the child remained well and symptom-free. This case highlights the role of the safety of laparoscopic surgery in abdominal trauma and duodenal perforations.