cytotype distribution
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Kiedrzyński ◽  
Katarzyna M. Zielińska ◽  
Iwona Jedrzejczyk ◽  
Edyta Kiedrzyńska ◽  
Przemysław P. Tomczyk ◽  
...  

AbstractOne promising area in understanding the responses of plants to ongoing global climate change is the adaptative effect of polyploidy. This work examines whether there is a coupling between the distribution of cytotypes and their biogeographical niche, and how different niches will affect their potential range. The study uses a range of techniques including flow cytometry, gradient and niche analysis, as well as distribution modelling. In addition, climatic, edaphic and habitat data was used to analyse environmental patterns and potential ranges of cytotypes in the first wide-range study of Festuca amethystina—a mixed-ploidy mountain grass. The populations were found to be ploidy homogeneous and demonstrate a parapatric pattern of cytotype distribution. Potential contact zones have been identified. The tetraploids have a geographically broader distribution than diploids; they also tend to occur at lower altitudes and grow in more diverse climates, geological units and habitats. Moreover, tetraploids have a more extensive potential range, being six-fold larger than diploids. Montane pine forests were found to be a focal environment suitable for both cytotypes, which has a central place in the environmental space of the whole species. Our findings present polyploidy as a visible driver of geographical, ecological and adaptive variation within the species.



2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baasanmunkh SHUKHERDORJ ◽  
Ju Eun JANG ◽  
Martin DUCHOSLAV ◽  
Hyeok Jae CHOI


2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 845-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristýna Hanušová ◽  
Martin Čertner ◽  
Tomáš Urfus ◽  
Petr Koutecký ◽  
Jiří Košnar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Polyploidy has played an important role in the evolution of ferns. However, the dearth of data on cytotype diversity, cytotype distribution patterns and ecology in ferns is striking in comparison with angiosperms and prevents an assessment of whether cytotype coexistence and its mechanisms show similar patterns in both plant groups. Here, an attempt to fill this gap was made using the ploidy-variable and widely distributed Cystopteris fragilis complex. Methods Flow cytometry was used to assess DNA ploidy level and monoploid genome size (Cx value) of 5518 C. fragilis individuals from 449 populations collected over most of the species’ global distributional range, supplemented with data from 405 individuals representing other related species from the complex. Ecological preferences of C. fragilis tetraploids and hexaploids were compared using field-recorded parameters and database-extracted climate data. Key Results Altogether, five different ploidy levels (2x, 4x, 5x, 6x, 8x) were detected and three species exhibited intraspecific ploidy-level variation: C. fragilis, C. alpina and C. diaphana. Two predominant C. fragilis cytotypes, tetraploids and hexaploids, co-occur over most of Europe in a diffuse, mosaic-like pattern. Within this contact zone, 40 % of populations were mixed-ploidy and most also contained pentaploid hybrids. Environmental conditions had only a limited effect on the distribution of cytotypes. Differences were found in the Cx value of tetraploids and hexaploids: between-cytotype divergence was higher in uniform-ploidy than in mixed-ploidy populations. Conclusions High ploidy-level diversity and widespread cytotype coexistence in the C. fragilis complex match the well-documented patterns in some angiosperms. While ploidy coexistence in C. fragilis is not driven by environmental factors, it could be facilitated by the perennial life-form of the species, its reproductive modes and efficient wind dispersal of spores. Independent origins of hexaploids and/or inter-ploidy gene flow may be expected in mixed-ploidy populations according to Cx value comparisons.



2015 ◽  
Vol 179 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Zahradníček ◽  
Jindřich Chrtek


2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 1380-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judita Zozomová-Lihová ◽  
Iva Malánová-Krásná ◽  
Petr Vít ◽  
Tomáš Urfus ◽  
Dušan Senko ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 179 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Lazarević ◽  
Nevena Kuzmanović ◽  
Dmitar Lakušić ◽  
Antun Alegro ◽  
Peter Schönswetter ◽  
...  


2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine McAllister ◽  
Russell Blaine ◽  
Paul Kron ◽  
Brent Bennett ◽  
Heidi Garrett ◽  
...  


2013 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Krejčíková ◽  
Radka Sudová ◽  
Magdalena Lučanová ◽  
Pavel Trávníček ◽  
Tomáš Urfus ◽  
...  


2012 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. 1047-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Castro ◽  
J. Loureiro ◽  
T. Procházka ◽  
Z. Münzbergová


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ada Wróblewska ◽  
Emilia Brzosko ◽  
Ewa Chudzińska ◽  
Sándor Bordács ◽  
Andriy Ivanovych Prokopiv


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document