Effect of Dexamethasone Combination with Gentamicin in Chemical Labyrinthectomy on Hearing Preservation and Vertigo Control in Patients with Unilateral Meniere’s Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Chemical labyrinthectomy using gentamicin is a popular method for treating intractable vertigo attacks in Meniere’s disease. However, the risk of hearing loss remains a major concern for clinicians. We investigated the effect of simultaneous dexamethasone and gentamicin application on hearing preservation and vertigo control in patients with intractable unilateral Meniere’s disease. A single-institutional, prospective, single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted. Gentamicin-soaked Gelfoam® was directly applied on the oval window following middle ear exploration. On the round window, dexamethasone-soaked Gelfoam® was applied in the gentamicin with dexamethasone group (GD group, n = 18), and saline-soaked Gelfoam® was applied in the gentamicin with sham reagent group (GO group, n = 19). The hearing change 8 weeks after the procedure and vertigo control 2–12 months after the procedure were investigated. The high-frequency hearing threshold was significantly increased in the GO group (p = 0.005 and 0.012 for 4 and 8 kHz, respectively), but not in the GD group. The short-term (2–6 months) vertigo control was more successful in the GD group (57.89% vs. 94.44%, p = 0.019), but long-term control (6–12 months) was insignificant. In conclusion, the combined application of gentamicin and dexamethasone in chemical labyrinthectomy is an effective method for protecting high-frequency hearing and vertigo control.

Vestibular Compensation after Vestibular Dysfunction Induced by Arsanilic Acid in Mice

When vestibular function is lost, vestibular compensation works for the reacquisition of body balance. For the study of vestibular dysfunction and vestibular compensation, surgical or chemical labyrinthectomy has been performed in various animal species. In the present study, we performed chemical labyrinthectomy using arsanilic acid in mice and investigated the time course of vestibular compensation through behavioral observations and histological studies. The surgical procedures required only paracentesis and storage of 50 µL of p-arsanilic acid sodium salt solution in the tympanic cavity for 5 min. From behavioral observations, vestibular functions were worst at 2 days and recovered by 7 days after surgery. Spontaneous nystagmus appeared at 1 day after surgery with arsanilic acid and disappeared by 2 days. Histological studies revealed specific damage to the vestibular endorgans. In the ipsilateral spinal vestibular nucleus, the medial vestibular nucleus, and the contralateral prepositus hypoglossal nucleus, a substantial number of c-Fos-immunoreactive cells appeared by 1 day after surgery with arsanilic acid, with a maximum increase in number by 2 days and complete disappearance by 7 days. Taken together, these findings indicate that chemical labyrinthectomy with arsanilic acid and the subsequent observation of vestibular compensation is a useful strategy for elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying vestibular pathophysiologies.

Labyrinthectomy and Vestibular Neurectomy for Intractable Vertiginous Symptoms

Introduction Labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy are considered the surgical procedures with the highest possibility of controlling medically untreatable incapacitating vertigo. Ironically, after 100 years of the introduction of both transmastoid labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy, the choice of which procedure to use rests primarily on the evaluation of the hearing and of the surgical morbidity. Objective To review surgical labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy for the treatment of incapacitating vestibular disorders. Data Sources PubMed, MD consult and Ovid-SP databases. Data Synthesis In this review we describe and compare surgical labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy. A contrast between surgical and chemical labyrinthectomy is also examined. Proper candidate selection, success in vertigo control and complication rates are discussed on the basis of a literature review. Conclusions Vestibular nerve section and labyrinthectomy achieve high and comparable rates of vertigo control. Even though vestibular neurectomy is considered a hearing sparing surgery, since it is an intradural procedure, it carries a greater risk of complications than transmastoid labyrinthectomy. Furthermore, since many patients whose hearing is preserved with vestibular nerve section may ultimately lose that hearing, the long-term value of hearing preservation is not well established. Although the combination of both procedures, in the form of a translabyrinthine vestibular nerve section, is the most certain way to ablate vestibular function for patients with no useful hearing and disabling vertigo, some advocate for transmastoid labyrinthectomy alone, considering that avoiding opening the subarachnoid space minimizes the possible intracranial complications. Chemical labyrinthectomy may be considered a safer alternative, but the risks of hearing loss when hearing preservation is desired are also high.