condom social marketing
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Sweat ◽  
Teresa Yeh ◽  
Caitlin Kennedy ◽  
Kevin O’Reilly ◽  
Kevin Armstrong ◽  
...  

Objective: To update the prior systematic review from studies published in the past 9 years that examine the effects of condom social marketing (CSM) programs on condom use in low- and middle-income countries. Data Sources: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and EMBASE. Hand searching of AIDS, AIDS and Behavior, AIDS Care, and AIDS Education and Prevention. Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: (a) Published from 1990 to January 16, 2019, (b) low- or middle-income country, (c) evaluated CSM, (d) analyses across preintervention to postintervention exposure or across multiple study arms, (e) measured condom use behavior, and (f) sought to prevent HIV transmission. Data Extraction: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 2 reviewers extracted citation, inclusion criteria, methods, study population, setting, sampling, study design, unit of analysis, loss to follow-up, comparison group characteristics, intervention characteristics, and eligible outcome results. Data Synthesis: The 2012 review found 6 studies (combined N = 23 048). In a meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratio for condom use was 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-2.84) for the most recent sexual encounter and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.51-2.91) for a composite of all condom use outcomes. Studies had significant methodological limitations. Of 518 possible new citations identified in the update, no new articles met our inclusion criteria. Conclusions: More studies are needed with stronger methodological rigor to help provide evidence for the continued use of this approach globally. There is a dearth of studies over the past decade on the effectiveness of CSM in increasing condom use in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC).


2012 ◽  
Vol 90 (8) ◽  
pp. 613-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Sweat ◽  
Julie Denison ◽  
Caitlin Kennedy ◽  
Virginia Tedrow ◽  
Kevin O'Reilly

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arti Sewak ◽  
Gurmeet Singh

Sexual Health ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Chapman ◽  
Krishna Jafa ◽  
Kim Longfield ◽  
Nadja Vielot ◽  
Justin Buszin ◽  
...  

Background Social marketing interventions are important in developing nations. Both increasing use and shifting users from receiving subsidised condoms need to be pursued using a Total Market Approach (TMA). This paper reviews the performance of social marketing through a cross-country comparison of condom use, equity and market share, plus a case study illustrating how TMA can be applied. Methods: Demographic and Health Survey data (1998–2007) provide condom use trends, concentration indices and sources of supply by gender for 11 African countries. Service delivery information and market research provide market share data for the same period. For the case study, two-yearly surveys (2001–09) are the source of condom trends, and retail audit data (2007–09) provide sustainability data. Results: Among women, condom use with a non-marital, non-cohabiting partner increased significantly in 7 of 11 countries. For men, 5 of 11 countries showed an increase in condom use. Equity improved for men in five countries and was achieved in two; for women, equity improved in three. Most obtained condoms from shops and pharmacies; social marketing was the dominant source of supply. Data from Kenya were informative for TMA, showing improvements in condom use over time, but sustainability results were mixed and equity was not measured. Overall market value and number of brands increased; however, subsidies increased over time. Conclusions: Condom social marketing interventions have advanced and achieved the goals of improving use and making condoms available in the private sector. It is time to manage interventions and influence markets to improve equity and sustainability.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
SB Kennedy ◽  
AO Harris ◽  
S Jubwe ◽  
CH Taylor ◽  
RB Martin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document