somatic transposition
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Siudeja ◽  
Marius Beek ◽  
Nick Riddiford ◽  
Benjamin Boumard ◽  
Annabelle Wurmser ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Siudeja ◽  
Marius van den Beek ◽  
Nick Riddiford ◽  
Benjamin Boumard ◽  
Annabelle Wurmser ◽  
...  

AbstractTransposable elements (TEs) play a significant role in evolution by contributing to genetic variation through germline insertional activity. However, how TEs act in somatic cells and tissues is not well understood. Here, we address the prevalence of transposition in a somatic tissue, exploiting the Drosophila midgut as a model system. Using whole-genome sequencing of in vivo clonally expanded gut tissue, we map hundreds of high-confidence somatic TE integration sites genome-wide. We show that somatic retrotransposon insertions are associated with inactivation of the tumor suppressor Notch, likely contributing to neoplasia formation. Moreover, by applying Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing technology, as well as by mapping germline TE activity, we provide evidence suggesting tissue-specific differences in retrotransposition. By comparing somatic TE insertional activity with transcriptomic and small RNA sequencing data, we demonstrate that transposon mobility cannot be simply predicted by whole tissue TE expression levels or by small RNA pathway activity. Finally, we reveal that somatic TE insertions in the adult fly intestine are found preferentially in genic regions and open, transcriptionally active chromatin. Together, our findings provide clear evidence of ongoing somatic transposition in Drosophila and delineate previously unknown underlying features of somatic TE mobility in vivo.


eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satyam P Srivastav ◽  
Reazur Rahman ◽  
Qicheng Ma ◽  
Jasmine Pierre ◽  
Saptaparni Bandyopadhyay ◽  
...  

Without transposon-silencing Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), transposition causes an ovarian atrophy syndrome in Drosophila called gonadal dysgenesis (GD). Harwich (Har) strains with P-elements cause severe GD in F1 daughters when Har fathers mate with mothers lacking P-element-piRNAs (i.e. ISO1 strain). To address the mystery of why Har induces severe GD, we bred hybrid Drosophila with Har genomic fragments into the ISO1 background to create HISR-D or HISR-N lines that still cause Dysgenesis or are Non-dysgenic, respectively. In these lines, we discovered a highly truncated P-element variant we named ‘Har-P’ as the most frequent de novo insertion. Although HISR-D lines still contain full-length P-elements, HISR-N lines lost functional P-transposase but retained Har-P’s that when crossed back to P-transposase restores GD induction. Finally, we uncovered P-element-piRNA-directed repression on Har-P’s transmitted paternally to suppress somatic transposition. The Drosophila short Har-P’s and full-length P-elements relationship parallels the MITEs/DNA-transposase in plants and SINEs/LINEs in mammals.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph D. Treiber ◽  
Scott Waddell

AbstractSomatic transposition in neural tissue could contribute to neuropathology and individuality, but its prevalence is debated. We used single-cell mRNA sequencing to map transposon expression in the Drosophila midbrain. We found that neural transposon expression is driven by cellular genes. Every expressed transposon is resident in at least one cellular gene with a matching expression pattern. A new long-read RNA sequencing approach revealed that coexpression is a physical link in the form of abundant chimeric transposon-gene mRNAs. We identified 148 genes where transposons introduce cryptic splice sites into the nascent transcript and thereby produce many additional mRNAs. Some genes exclusively produce chimeric mRNAs with transposon sequence and on average transposon-gene chimeras account for 20% of the mRNAs produced from a given gene. Transposons therefore significantly expand the neural transcriptome. We propose that chimeric mRNAs produced by splicing into polymorphic transposons may contribute to functional differences between individual cells and animals.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satyam P. Srivastav ◽  
Reazur Rahman ◽  
Qicheng Ma ◽  
Nelson C. Lau

ABSTRACTWithout transposon-silencing Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), transposition causes an ovarian atrophy syndrome in Drosophila called gonadal dysgenesis (GD). Harwich (Har) strains with P-elements cause severe GD in F1 daughters when Har fathers mate with mothers lacking P-element-piRNAs (i.e. ISO1 strain). To address the mystery of why Har induces severe GD, we bred hybrid Drosophila with Har genomic fragments into the ISO1 background to create HISR-D or HISR-N lines that still cause Dysgenesis or are Non-dysgenic, respectively. In these lines, we discovered a highly truncated P-element variant we named “Har-P” as the most frequent de novo insertion. Although HISR-D lines still contain full-length P-elements, HISR-N lines lost functional P-transposase but retained Har-P’s that when crossed back to P-transposase restores GD induction. Finally, we uncovered P-element-piRNA-directed repression on Har-P’s transmitted paternally to suppress somatic transposition. The Drosophila short Har-P’s and full-length P-elements relationship parallels the MITEs/DNA-transposase in plants and SINEs/LINEs in mammals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruslan Kalendar ◽  
Asset Amenov ◽  
Asset Daniyarov

Transposable elements (TEs) are common mobile genetic elements comprising several classes and making up the majority of eukaryotic genomes. The movement and accumulation of TEs has been a major force shaping the genes and genomes of most organisms. Most eukaryotic genomes are dominated by retrotransposons and minimal DNA transposon accumulation. The ‘copy and paste’ lifecycle of replicative transposition produces new genome insertions without excising the original element. Horizontal TE transfer among lineages is rare. TEs represent a reservoir of potential genomic instability and RNA-level toxicity. Many TEs appear static and nonfunctional, but some are capable of replicating and mobilising to new positions, and somatic transposition events have been observed. The overall structure of retrotransposons and the domains responsible for the phases of their replication are highly conserved in all eukaryotes. TEs are important drivers of species diversity and exhibit great variety in their structure, size and transposition mechanisms, making them important putative actors in evolution. Because TEs are abundant in plant genomes, various applications have been developed to exploit polymorphisms in TE insertion patterns, including conventional or anchored PCR, and quantitative or digital PCR with primers for the 5ʹ or 3ʹ junction. Alternatively, the retrotransposon junction can be mapped using high-throughput next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics. With these applications, TE insertions can be rapidly, easily and accurately identified, or new TE insertions can be found. This review provides an overview of the TE-based applications developed for plant species and assesses the contributions of TEs to the analysis of plants’ genetic diversity.


eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph D Treiber ◽  
Scott Waddell

Somatic transposition in mammals and insects could increase cellular diversity and neural mobilization has been implicated in age-dependent decline. To understand the impact of transposition in somatic cells it is essential to reliably measure the frequency and map locations of new insertions. Here we identified thousands of putative somatic transposon insertions in neurons from individual Drosophila melanogaster using whole-genome sequencing. However, the number of de novo insertions did not correlate with transposon expression or fly age. Analysing our data with exons as ‘immobile genetic elements’ revealed a similar frequency of unexpected exon translocations. A new sequencing strategy that recovers transposon: chromosome junction information revealed most putative de novo transposon and exon insertions likely result from unavoidable chimeric artefacts. Reanalysis of other published data suggests similar artefacts are often mistaken for genuine somatic transposition. We conclude that somatic transposition is less prevalent in Drosophila than previously envisaged.


DNA Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. dsw060
Author(s):  
Alessandra Borgognone ◽  
Raúl Castanera ◽  
Elaia Muguerza ◽  
Antonio G. Pisabarro ◽  
Lucía Ramírez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document