yield gap analysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

94
(FIVE YEARS 35)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 4602
Author(s):  
Keltoum Khechba ◽  
Ahmed Laamrani ◽  
Driss Dhiba ◽  
Khalil Misbah ◽  
Abdelghani Chehbouni

Africa has the largest population growth rate in the world and an agricultural system characterized by the predominance of smallholder farmers. Improving food security in Africa will require a good understanding of farming systems yields as well as reducing yield gaps (i.e., the difference between potential yield and actual farmer yield). To this end, crop yield gap practices in African countries need to be understood to fill this gap while decreasing the environmental impacts of agricultural systems. For instance, the variability of yields has been demonstrated to be strongly controlled by soil fertilizer use, irrigation management, soil attribute, and the climate. Consequently, the quantitative assessment and mapping information of soil attributes such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), soil organic carbon (SOC), moisture content (MC), and soil texture (i.e., clay, sand and silt contents) on the ground are essential to potentially reducing the yield gap. However, to assess, measure, and monitor these soil yield-related parameters in the field, there is a need for rapid, accurate, and inexpensive methods. Recent advances in remote sensing technologies and high computational performances offer a unique opportunity to implement cost-effective spatiotemporal methods for estimating crop yield with important levels of scalability. However, researchers and scientists in Africa are not taking advantage of the opportunity of increasingly available geospatial remote sensing technologies and data for yield studies. The objectives of this report are to (i) conduct a review of scientific literature on the current status of African yield gap analysis research and their variation in regard to soil properties management by using remote sensing techniques; (ii) review and describe optimal yield practices in Africa; and (iii) identify gaps and limitations to higher yields in African smallholder farms and propose possible improvements. Our literature reviewed 80 publications and covered a period of 22 years (1998-2020) over many selected African countries with a potential yield improvement. Our results found that (i) the number of agriculture yield-focused remote sensing studies has gradually increased, with the largest proportion of studies published during the last 15 years; (ii) most studies were conducted exclusively using multispectral Landsat and Sentinel sensors; and (iii) over the past decade, hyperspectral imagery has contributed to a better understanding of yield gap analysis compared to multispectral imagery; (iv) soil nutrients (i.e., NPK) are not the main factor influencing the studied crop productivity in Africa, whereas clay, SOC, and soil pH were the most examined soil properties in prior papers.


Author(s):  
P. Deka ◽  
B. K. Baishya ◽  
G. Bhagawati ◽  
M. K. Bhuyan ◽  
R. K. Nath

The present study was carried out at five different villages of Kokrajhar district of Assam where cluster front line demonstration (CFLD) of High Yielding Variety (HYV) of rape seed (TS 46) was conducted by Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kokrajhar.  A total of 652 nos. of front line demonstration (FLD)s were evaluated to find out the yield gaps between HYV toria variety TS 46 and variety grown by farmers. Yield data of both demonstration and farmers practice were recorded and their yield gap, technology gap, extension gap and technology index were analyzed. The yield of rape seed variety TS 46 was registered 22.38 to 50.00 per cent higher over farmer’s variety. On an average technology gap, extension gap and technology index were recorded as 2.28qha-1, 2.08 qha-1 and 20.73 per cent respectively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 5689-5704
Author(s):  
Aart van der Linden ◽  
Simon J. Oosting ◽  
Gerrie W.J. van de Ven ◽  
Ronald Zom ◽  
Martin K. van Ittersum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 460-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-jing SHAO ◽  
Wen-qing ZHAO ◽  
Zhi-guo ZHOU ◽  
Kang DU ◽  
Ling-jie KONG ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan R. Insua ◽  
Claudio F. Machado ◽  
Sergio C. Garcia ◽  
Germán D. Berone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document