surface wettability
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1141
(FIVE YEARS 377)

H-INDEX

55
(FIVE YEARS 10)

2022 ◽  
Vol 431 ◽  
pp. 133988
Author(s):  
Xiaofang Li ◽  
Ping Wang ◽  
Zechen Yan ◽  
Shifan Yu ◽  
Kangxing Wei ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Brandy Perkins-Howard ◽  
Ashley R. Walker ◽  
Quynh Do ◽  
Dodangodage Ishara Senadheera ◽  
Fawwaz Hazzazi ◽  
...  

Soft Matter ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen L. Lee ◽  
Tak Shing Chan ◽  
Andreas Carlson ◽  
Kari Dalnoki-Veress

Small droplets on slender conical fibers spontaneously move along the fiber due to capillary action. The droplet motion depends on the geometry of the cone, the surface wettability, the surface...


2022 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 110508
Author(s):  
Weiliang Kong ◽  
Liping Wang ◽  
Peixiang Bian ◽  
Hong Liu

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Javier Gil ◽  
Román Pérez ◽  
Mariano Herrero-Climent ◽  
Maria Rizo-Gorrita ◽  
Daniel Torres-Lagares ◽  
...  

Objectives. The purpose of this work was to determine the influence of residual alumina after sand blasting treatment in titanium dental implants. This paper studied the effect of alumina on physico-chemical surface properties, such as: surface wettability, surface energy. Osseointegration and bacteria adhesion were determined in order to determine the effect of the abrasive particles. Materials and Methods. Three surfaces were studied: (1) as-received, (2) rough surface with residual alumina from sand blasting on the surface and (3) with the same roughness but without residual alumina. Roughness was determined by white light interferometer microscopy. Surface wettability was evaluated with a contact angle video-based system and the surface free energy by means of Owens and Wendt equation. Scanning electron microscopy equipped with microanalysis was used to study the morphology and determine the chemical composition of the surfaces. Bacteria (Lactobacillus salivarius and Streptococcus sanguinis) were cultured in each surface. In total, 110 dental implants were placed into the bone of eight minipigs in order to compare the osseointegration. The percentage of bone-to-implant contact was determined after 4 and 6 weeks of implantation with histometric analysis. Results. The surfaces with residual alumina presented a lower surface free energy than clean surfaces. The in vivo studies demonstrated that the residual alumina accelerated bone tissue growth at different implantation times, in relation to clean dental implants. In addition, residual alumina showed a bactericidal effect by decreasing the quantity of bacteria adhering to the titanium. Conclusions. It is possible to verify the benefits that the alumina (percentages around 8% in weight) produces on the surface of titanium dental implants. Clinical relevance. Clinicians should be aware of the benefits of sand-blasted alumina due to the physico-chemical surface changes demonstrated in in vivo tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document