growth trajectory
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

253
(FIVE YEARS 104)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
L. Charles Bailey ◽  
Matthew Bryan ◽  
Mitchell Maltenfort ◽  
Jason P. Block ◽  
Rachel Teneralli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S142-S143
Author(s):  
Pedro Argoti ◽  
Mohammed Elshafey ◽  
Claudio Schenone ◽  
Giancarlo Mari ◽  
Patricia Goedecke ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tom Stafford ◽  
Deborah J. Armstrong

Friends, Deb Armstrong and I have reached the culmination of our editorial term, and K.D. Joshi of University of Nevada-Reno has been chosen as the new Editor-in-Chief. Professor Joshi is a long-time contributor, Senior Editor, and thought leader in our parent organization, ACM SIGMIS, and its venerable CPR conference. K.D. has a marvelous vision, superb connections with our ACM SIGMIS CPR constituency, and an operational record second to none. She will be a great leader for continuing the growth trajectory of The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-yu Shao ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
Pei Li ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Pei-pei Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The association of low socioeconomic status (SES) with childhood and adolescent obesity has been reported. It is unknown whether low SES affects body mass index (BMI) growth trajectory in the first 12 mo of life. Moreover, accelerated growth as a compensatory mechanism for low birth weight (LBW) during infancy, is an important predictor of later obesity. The aim of the present study was to examine the association of low SES with infancy BMI growth rate and trajectory for LBW and normal birth weight (NBW) infants. Methods From September 2012 to October 2014, a total of 387 infants in this longitudinal study was subjected to repeated measures of weight and length from birth to 12 mo in Hefei. Generalized growth mixture modeling was used to classify the infancy BMI growth trajectories. Differences in infancy BMI z score (zBMI) and BMI growth rate between low SES and high SES were estimated based on linear regression after adjusting for several confounders including maternal age, pregnancy BMI, physical activity during pregnancy, paternal BMI as well as alcohol use, paternal smoking status, breastfeeding duration and delivery mode. Results Infancy BMI trajectories in this study were classified into three categories: rapid growth (class 1), normal growth (class 2) and slow growth (class 3). Low SES infants had the higher zBMI than high SES infants for LBW group at age 6 mo [zBMI difference with 95% CI at 6 mo: 0.28(0.03, 0.53); at 12 mo: 0.21(0.01, 0.43)]. Low SES infants had more rapid zBMI growth rate than those with high SES for low birth weight between 0 and 6 months. Controlling for the confounders, these associations remained robust. We found the lower SES in the rapid growth group. Conclusions These findings highlighted the impact of low SES on increasing BMI and accelerated growth during early infancy. Health care and relatively optimal family environment in the first 12 mo of life, especially for LBW infants, are benefit to shape the better infancy growth trajectory.


Aquaculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 737838
Author(s):  
Abderrazak Chahid ◽  
Ibrahima N'Doye ◽  
John E. Majoris ◽  
Michael L. Berumen ◽  
Taous-Meriem Laleg-Kirati

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Dag Øivind Madsen ◽  
Terje Berg

This study provides an exploratory bibliometric analysis of the emerging literature on Industry 5.0, which is a new visionary concept on the future of industry. Industry 5.0 has in recent years begun to attract the interest of both practitioners and academics, but this new field can still be considered embryonic and not well documented. Therefore, this study aims to map the field and provide a preliminary picture of the emergence and status of the scientific literature on Industry 5.0. Bibliometric data covering the period from 2015 to 2021 were extracted from the Scopus database. Bibliometric analyses of overall publication volume and growth trajectory, influential documents, authors, sources and countries are performed. The exploratory analysis provides a preliminary overview of the birth and emergence of this new research area. The results are discussed in relation to theories on the emergence and evolution of new management concepts. The article closes with some speculations about the future trajectory of Industry 5.0.


Author(s):  
Makiko Nanishi ◽  
Michimasa Fujiogi ◽  
Michelle Stevenson ◽  
Liming Liang ◽  
Ying Shelly Qi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 253 ◽  
pp. 104713
Author(s):  
Mahesh Shivanand Dige ◽  
Pramod Kumar Rout ◽  
Manoj Kumar Singh ◽  
Saket Bhusan ◽  
Rakesh Kaushik ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 263178772110494
Author(s):  
Patrick Haack ◽  
Andreas Rasche

Sustainability standards have proliferated widely in recent years but their legitimacy remains contested. This paper suggests that sustainability standards need to cope with an important but unexplored paradox to gain legitimacy. While standard setters create low entry barriers and requirements for adopters so that standards can diffuse quickly and achieve a status of cognitive legitimacy, standards also need to ensure that adopters create high levels of impact, thereby acquiring moral legitimacy. While the need for diffusion and impact occurs at the same time, they cannot be achieved simultaneously. We unpack this paradox and show that its salience for standard setters differs depending on (a) the growth trajectory of a standard and (b) the perceived intensity of the demands for diffusion and impact. We outline five response strategies that standard setters can use to tackle the diffusion–impact paradox and illustrate our theoretical considerations through a detailed case study of the UN Global Compact. Our paper advances scholarly understandings on how sustainability standards gain legitimacy and sheds light on the complex and inherently paradoxical nature of legitimacy. We derive implications for the literatures on sustainability standards, legitimacy, and paradox management.


Author(s):  
Claire L. Molony ◽  
Richard Hiscock ◽  
Jonathan Kaufman ◽  
Emerson Keenan ◽  
Roxanne Hastie ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document