brand consideration
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Santoso ◽  
Malcolm J. Wright ◽  
Giang Trinh ◽  
Mark Avis

Purpose This study aims to investigate whether digital advertising can be effective despite consumer inattention and how certain common combinations of ad characteristics increase or decrease ad effectiveness under conditions of low attention. Design/methodology/approach Using two online experiments in naturalistic environment, the authors compare ad effects under focussed, divided and incidental attention, for certain ad characteristics, namely, appeal type and (mis)matching between appeal and brand type. The results are analysed using logistic regression. Findings Ad exposure under low attention does increase brand consideration and choice. The greatest uplift in impact occurs when moving from non-exposure to incidental attention. Under incidental attention, emotive advertising was more effective than rational advertising, as was matching rather than mismatching an emotional appeal to a hedonic brand. Conversely, under divided attention, rational advertising and mismatching a rational appeal to a hedonic brand were more effective. Research limitations/implications This research explores the effectiveness of Twitter ads with an emotional or a rational appeal and the (mis)matching between appeal and utilitarian or hedonic brand type. Future research can examine other formats and creative elements of digital advertising that can affect the low-attention processing and the effects that occur. Practical implications Intrusive, attention-getting advertising strategies may not be necessary. Certain common creative devices can increase advertising effectiveness despite low attention, so marketers can ensure consumer-centric marketing communication. Originality/value There has previously been limited understanding of low-attention mechanisms in advertising and little evidence of ad effectiveness under conditions of low attention. The research also demonstrates that certain ad characteristics, linked to common creative devices, enhance the impact of advertising despite low attention.


Brand Metrics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 15-27
Author(s):  
Jacek Kall
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
Claudion Graciella ◽  
Erica Dea Hutama ◽  
Fransisca Andreani

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui faktor baru yang dapat terbentuk dari Brand Citizenship Behavior (BCB) di Hotel Sheraton Surabaya. BCB adalah perilaku karyawan yang mencerminkan merek organisasinya. Karena perilaku karyawan mencerminkan merek organisasinya, maka sangatlah penting untuk membentuk perilaku karyawan.  Penelitian ini bertujuan mereduksi 7 faktor BCB (helping behavior, brand consideration, brand enthusiasm, sportsmanship, brand endorsement, self-development, brand advancement) dengan menggunakan Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor baru yang terbentuk adalah helping behavior, brand enthusiasm, self-development, dan brand loyalty


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo Carrazedo Costa Filho ◽  
Roberto P.Q. Falcao ◽  
Paulo Cesar de Mendonça Motta

Purpose Low-income consumers (LICs) have gained more attention from marketers after Prahalad and Hart (2004) called attention to untapped opportunities among the world’s poorest. Once neglected and seen as price-driven, more recent research has depicted LICs as brand-conscious consumers who are willing to pay a premium for quality. However, because LICs must balance their tight budgets with aspirations for branded items, this perspective may be too optimistic. To address this issue, the purpose of this paper is to investigate brand consideration and loyalty among LICs across a wide range of products. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a qualitative-inductive approach to assess LICs’ brand considerations across ten fast-moving consumer goods. In-depth interviews with 20 Brazilian LICs were conducted. Findings The authors found that brand loyalty among LICs is both context- and category-dependent. Patterns of loyalty are influenced by five factors: perceived differentiation, perceived risk, contextual usage, proportion of the category expenditure to household income and hedonic vs functional consumption. It seems that the interplay of these factors ultimately shapes differently the attitudes and repeated patronage of brands within each category among LICs. Research limitations/implications Generalizability of findings is limited owing to the qualitative method used. Practical implications The authors provide practical insights to managers concerning key attributes that influence brand consideration and loyalty among LICs. Originality/value This paper adds to the yet limited knowledge on LICs and provides a deeper and more holistic understanding of the relation of LICs with brands.


2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 3645-3651
Author(s):  
Jenni Romaniuk ◽  
Magda Nenycz-Thiel

Author(s):  
Jirawan Plungpongpan ◽  
Leela Tiangsoongnern ◽  
Mark Speece

Purpose This research examines the effects of University Social Responsibility (USR) on the brand image of private universities in Thailand. Brand image is important for entry into the consideration set as prospective students evaluate options for university study.USR activities may be implicit or explicit, i.e., actively communicated to external stakeholders. We show that explicit USR can help put a university into the brand consideration set. Design/methodology/approach This pilot research uses qualitative interviews to explore perceptions of six private university executives, six M6 (high school) students, and the parents of the M6 students. Findings In Thailand, some USR elements are mandated components of quality assurance, but many universities go beyond basic requirements. The university executives talked about USR beyond simply meeting government QA requirements. USR can contribute to competitiveness and it helps produce better, more socially responsible graduates. Communication about USR is done through both online and traditional media, but public knowledge lags somewhat compared to what universities actually do. M6 students are more aware of university USR activities than their parents because of online media and university roadshows at their schools. USR is not the major factor in choosing a university, and many activities are not well known. However, students and parents think that USR is helpful, and some activities directly impact inclusion in the brand consideration set. Practical implications Universities can apply these USR activities to strengthen their brand images and become part of the consideration set. However, they need more careful marketing communications to fully inform stakeholders about the whole range of USR. Originality/value The researchers have examined how private Thai universities use USR activities as a part of government mandated QA components. These USR activities can contribute to their brand image and help move the university into the brand consideration set.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jirawan Plungpongpan ◽  
Leela Tiangsoongnern ◽  
Mark Speece

2015 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane Baxendale ◽  
Emma K. Macdonald ◽  
Hugh N. Wilson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document