ecosystem organization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (45) ◽  
pp. e2013564118
Author(s):  
Luis Miguel de Jesús Astacioa ◽  
Kaumudi H. Prabhakara ◽  
Zeqian Li ◽  
Harry Mickalide ◽  
Seppe Kuehn

Cycles of nutrients (N, P, etc.) and resources (C) are a defining emergent feature of ecosystems. Cycling plays a critical role in determining ecosystem structure at all scales, from microbial communities to the entire biosphere. Stable cycles are essential for ecosystem persistence because they allow resources and nutrients to be regenerated. Therefore, a central problem in ecology is understanding how ecosystems are organized to sustain robust cycles. Addressing this problem quantitatively has proved challenging because of the difficulties associated with manipulating ecosystem structure while measuring cycling. We address this problem using closed microbial ecosystems (CES), hermetically sealed microbial consortia provided with only light. We develop a technique for quantifying carbon cycling in hermetically sealed microbial communities and show that CES composed of an alga and diverse bacterial consortia self-organize to robustly cycle carbon for months. Comparing replicates of diverse CES, we find that carbon cycling does not depend strongly on the taxonomy of the bacteria present. Moreover, despite strong taxonomic differences, self-organized CES exhibit a conserved set of metabolic capabilities. Therefore, an emergent carbon cycle enforces metabolic but not taxonomic constraints on ecosystem organization. Our study helps establish closed microbial communities as model ecosystems to study emergent function and persistence in replicate systems while controlling community composition and the environment.


Forests ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 485
Author(s):  
Anna Łubek ◽  
Martin Kukwa ◽  
Bogdan Jaroszewicz ◽  
Patryk Czortek

Current trends emphasize the importance of the examination of the functional composition of lichens, which may provide information on the species realized niche diversity and community assembly processes, thus enabling one to understand the specific adaptations of lichens and their interaction with the environment. We analyzed the distribution and specialization of diverse morphological, anatomical and chemical (lichen secondary metabolites) traits in lichen communities in a close-to-natural forest of lowland Europe. We considered these traits in relation to three levels of forest ecosystem organization: forest communities, phorophyte species and substrates, in order to recognize the specialization of functional traits to different levels of the forest complexity. Traits related to the sexual reproduction of mycobionts (i.e., ascomata types: lecanoroid apothecia, lecideoid apothecia, arthonioid apothecia, lirellate apothecia, stalked apothecia and perithecia) and asexual reproduction of mycobionts (pycnidia, hyphophores and sporodochia) demonstrated the highest specialization to type of substrate, tree species and forest community. Thallus type (foliose, fruticose, crustose and leprose thalli), ascospore dark pigmentation and asexual reproduction by lichenized diaspores (soredia and isidia) revealed the lowest specialization to tree species and substrate, as well as to forest community. Results indicate that lichen functional trait assemblage distribution should not only be considered at the level of differences in the internal structure of the analyzed forest communities (e.g., higher number of diverse substrates or tree species) but also studied in relation to specific habitat conditions (insolation, moisture, temperature, eutrophication) that are characteristic of a particular forest community. Our work contributes to the understanding of the role of the forest structure in shaping lichen functional trait composition, as well as enhancing our knowledge on community assembly rules of lichen species.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. G. Gorshkov ◽  
A. M. Makarieva

AbstractPrinciples of stable ecosystem organization are considered together with the role of abundant space, matter and energy in its maintenance. Life features the dichotomy of immotile (sessile, sedentary) organisms like plants, fungi, bacteria, on the one hand, versus organisms capable of active locomotion (animals) on the other. The immotile life can form a continuous live cover on the Earth’s surface. Since all available space is occupied, the immotile life does not experience an affluence of matter, energy and space itself. It turns out that this lack of abundance permits organization, on the basis of immotile organisms, of a stable ecosystem with a steady biomass. This live biomass comprises time-invariable genetic information about how to keep the environment in a stable state by controlling the degree of openness of nutrient cycles. Crucially, depending on their body size, energy and matter consumption by large animals exceed the area-specific fluxes of net primary production and its consumption in the immotile ecosystem by up to three orders of magnitude. The implication is that the herbivorous animals can meet their energy demands if and only if they move and destroy the live biomass of the immotile ecosystem. In consequence, if the immotile heterotrophs are replaced by locomotive heterotrophs, the ecosystem biomass experiences huge fluctuations and the ecosystem loses its capacity to maintain its favorable environment. From available theoretical and empirical evidence we conclude that life’s organization remains stable if the share of consumption by large animals is strictly limited, not exceeding about one per cent of ecosystem net primary production.


Philosophies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Ulanowicz

Ecology, with its emphasis on coupled processes and massive heterogeneity, is not amenable to complete mechanical reduction, which is frustrated for reasons of history, dimensionality, logic, insufficiency, and contingency. Physical laws are not violated, but can only constrain, not predict. Outcomes are predicated instead by autocatalytic configurations, which emerge as stable temporal series of incorporated contingencies. Ecosystem organization arises out of agonism between autocatalytic selection and entropic dissolution. A degree of disorganization, inefficiency, and functional redundancy must be retained by all living systems to ensure flexibility in the face of novel disturbances. That physical and biological dynamics exhibit significant incongruencies argues for the formulation of alternative metaphysical assumptions, referred to here as “Process Ecology”.


2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel P. Veldhuis ◽  
Matty P. Berg ◽  
Michel Loreau ◽  
Han Olff

PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e13382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphaël Proulx ◽  
Christian Wirth ◽  
Winfried Voigt ◽  
Alexandra Weigelt ◽  
Christiane Roscher ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 262 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Azaele ◽  
R. Muneepeerakul ◽  
A. Rinaldo ◽  
I. Rodriguez-Iturbe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document