Protein shape modulates crowding effects

Protein−protein interactions are usually studied in dilute buffered solutions with macromolecule concentrations of <10 g/L. In cells, however, the macromolecule concentration can exceed 300 g/L, resulting in nonspecific interactions between macromolecules. These interactions can be divided into hard-core steric repulsions and “soft” chemical interactions. Here, we test a hypothesis from scaled particle theory; the influence of hard-core repulsions on a protein dimer depends on its shape. We tested the idea using a side-by-side dumbbell-shaped dimer and a domain-swapped ellipsoidal dimer. Both dimers are variants of the B1 domain of protein G and differ by only three residues. The results from the relatively inert synthetic polymer crowding molecules, Ficoll and PEG, support the hypothesis, indicating that the domain-swapped dimer is stabilized by hard-core repulsions while the side-by-side dimer shows little to no stabilization. We also show that protein cosolutes, which interact primarily through nonspecific chemical interactions, have the same small effect on both dimers. Our results suggest that the shape of the protein dimer determines the influence of hard-core repulsions, providing cells with a mechanism for regulating protein−protein interactions.

Cotranslocational processing of the protein substrate calmodulin by an AAA+ unfoldase occurs via unfolding and refolding intermediates

Protein remodeling by AAA+ enzymes is central for maintaining proteostasis in a living cell. However, a detailed structural description of how this is accomplished at the level of the substrate molecules that are acted upon is lacking. Here, we combine chemical cross-linking and methyl transverse relaxation-optimized NMR spectroscopy to study, at atomic resolution, the stepwise unfolding and subsequent refolding of the two-domain substrate calmodulin by the VAT AAA+ unfoldase from Thermoplasma acidophilum. By engineering intermolecular disulphide bridges between the substrate and VAT we trap the substrate at different stages of translocation, allowing structural studies throughout the translocation process. Our results show that VAT initiates substrate translocation by pulling on intrinsically unstructured N or C termini of substrate molecules without showing specificity for a particular amino acid sequence. Although the B1 domain of protein G is shown to unfold cooperatively, translocation of calmodulin leads to the formation of intermediates, and these differ on an individual domain level in a manner that depends on whether pulling is from the N or C terminus. The approach presented generates an atomic resolution picture of substrate unfolding and subsequent refolding by unfoldases that can be quite different from results obtained via in vitro denaturation experiments.

The Role of E27-K31 and E56-K10 Salt-Bridge Pairs in the Unfolding Mechanism of the B1 Domain of Protein G

Molecular dynamics simulations of the B1 fragment of protein G (56 residues) have been performed at 325, 350, 375, 400, 450 and 500 K for 10 ns. An analysis of its structural and energetic parameters has indicated that the unfolding process of the GB1 protein begins at 900 ps of a 500-K simulation. The unfolding process is initiated when hydrogen bonds in the hydrophobic core region are broken; it continues with the α-helix transformation into coils and turns and ends with the destruction of the β-hairpins. These unfolding events are consistent with the hybrid model of the protein folding/unfolding mechanism, which is a compromise between the hydrophobic core collapse model and the zipper model. Salt-bridge pairs were found to play an important role in the unfolding process by maintaining the integrity of the tertiary structure of the protein. The breaking (or disappearance) of the salt-bridge pairs E27–K31 (in the α-helix) and E56–K10 (connecting β4 and β1) has resulted in the destruction of secondary structures and indicates the beginning of the unfolding process. Our results also suggest that the unfolding process in this simulation was not a complete denaturation of the protein because some β-hairpins remained

Immunoglobulin binding (B1) domain mediated antibody conjugation to quantum dots for in vitro and in vivo molecular imaging

A facile method for the preparation of antibody–quantum dot conjugates using the immunoglobulin binding (B1) domain of protein G is presented. The utility of antibody–quantum dot conjugates using the B1 domain is demonstrated for fluorescence imaging of breast tumor cellsin vitroandin vivo.