Endobronchial resection as a bridge to curative resection in patient with poor preoperative lung function secondary to an airway blocking endobronchial carcinoid tumour

We present a 70-year-old gentleman with chronic cough with haemoptysis found to have left lower zone collapse on imaging. The bronchoscopy showed an endobronchial mass histologically of a non-secreting atypical carcinoid. Poor baseline lung function excluded surgical resection, and instead, he successfully underwent a bronchoscopic debulking procedure which improved his FEV1 to 84% and DLCO 83% predicted. Unfortunately, the tumour regrew, but the calculated percentage predicted postoperative for FEV1 (64%), and DLCO (65%) enabled definitive surgical resection to take place. Surgical resection remains the definite curative option for localised endobronchial atypical carcinoid tumours. Achieving this in proximal endobronchial carcinoid tumour is a challenge. We described an endoscopic tumour debulking procedure as a bridge for curative surgical resection in a patient with an inoperable proximal atypical carcinoid tumour due to poor predicted postoperative lung function. We highlighted the need to assess predicted postoperative lung function with functional and quantitative perfusion methods to aid surgical planning. Debulking the tumour by endoscopy can be used as a conduit to curative surgical resection in bronchial carcinoid tumour. The choice of calculating the percentage predicted values by either or both methods must be individualised based on tumour location and the probability of converting a lobectomy to a pneumonectomy. This precautionary approach could evaluate the postoperative lung function and morbidity and mortality risk if considering a pneumonectomy. Endoscopic debulking can be a successful bridge to a curative surgical resection aided by comprehensive preoperative lung function tests to predict postoperative lung values

The Value of Residual Volume/Total Lung Capacity as an Indicator for Predicting Postoperative Lung Function in Non-Small Lung Cancer

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most frequently occurring concomitant diseases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is characterized by small airways and the hyperinflation of the lung. Patients with hyperinflated lung tend to have more reserved lung function than conventionally predicted after lung cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to identify other indicators in predicting postoperative lung function after lung resection for lung cancer. Patients with NSCLC who underwent curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection from 2017 to 2019 were included. Predicted postoperative FEV1 (ppoFEV1) was calculated using the formula: preoperative FEV1 × (19 segments-the number of segments to be removed) ÷ 19. The difference between the measured postoperative FEV1 and ppoFEV1 was defined as an outcome. Patients were categorized into two groups: preserved FEV1 if the difference was positive and non-preserved FEV1, if otherwise. In total, 238 patients were included: 74 (31.1%) in the FEV1 non-preserved group and 164 (68.9%) in the FEV1 preserved group. The proportion of preoperative residual volume (RV)/total lung capacity (TLC) ≥ 40% in the FEV1 non-preserved group (21.4%) was lower than in the preserved group (36.1%) (p = 0.03). In logistic regression analysis, preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was related to postoperative FEV1 preservation. (adjusted OR, 2.02, p = 0.041). Linear regression analysis suggested that preoperative RV/TLC was positively correlated with a significant difference. (p = 0.004) Preoperative RV/TLC ≥ 40% was an independent predictor of preserved lung function in patients undergoing curative lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. Preoperative RV/TLC is positively correlated with postoperative lung function.

A Modified Calculation Improves the Accuracy of Predicted Postoperative Lung Function Values in Lung Cancer Patients

Purpose Preoperative pulmonary function testing is mandatory for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery. The predicted postoperative FEV1 (ppoFEV1) is used for further risk stratification. We compared the ppoFEV1 with the postoperative FEV1 (postFEV1) in order to improve the calculation of the ppoFEV1. Methods 87 patients voluntarily received an FEV1 assessment 1 year after surgery. ppoFEV1 was calculated according to the Brunelli calculation. Baseline characteristics and surgical procedure were compared in a uni- and multivariate analysis between different accuracy levels of the ppoFEV1. Parameters which remained significant in the multinominal regression analysis were evaluated for a modification of the ppoFEV1 calculation. Results Independent factors for a more inaccurate ppoFEV1 were preoperative active smoking (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, confidence interval (CI) 3.6–6.41; p = 0.01), packyears (OR 4.1, CI 3.6–6.41; p = 0.008), younger age (OR 1.1, CI 1.01–1.12; p = 0.03), and patients undergoing pneumectomy (OR 5.55, CI 1.35–23.6; p = 0.01). For the customized ppoFEV1 we excluded pneumonectomies. For patients < 60 years, an additional lung segment was added to the calculation. ppoFEV1 = preFEV1 × $$1-\left(\frac{\text{Lung segments resected} + 1}{\text{Total number of segments}}\right)$$ 1 - Lung segments resected + 1 Total number of segments . For actively smoking patients with more than 30 packyears we subtracted one lung segment from the calculation ppoFEV1 = PreFEV1 × $$1-\left(\frac{\text{Lung segments resected} - 1}{\text{Total number of segments}}\right)$$ 1 - Lung segments resected - 1 Total number of segments . Conclusion We were able to enhance the predictability of the ppoFEV1 with modifications. The modified ppoFEV1 (1.828 l ± 0.479 l) closely approximates the postFEV1 of 1.823 l ± 0.476 l, (0.27%) while the original ppoFEV1 calculation is at 1.78 l ± 0.53 (2.19%). However, if patients require pneumectomy, more complex techniques to determine the ppoFEV1 should be included to stratify risk.

Comparison between lung perfusion scan and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for predicting postoperative lung function after pulmonary resection in patients with borderline lung function

OBJECTIVES We compared the usefulness of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and lung perfusion scintigraphy (LPS) for predicting postoperative lung function by comparing patients with borderline lung function. METHODS A total of 274 patients who underwent simultaneous LPS and SPECT/CT and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) or diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) under 80% were included. The % uptake by LPS was calculated by the posterior-oblique method. The concordance and difference of the % uptake, predicted postoperative (ppo) FEV1 and ppoDLCO as determined by 2 methods were evaluated. The association between ppo values and actual postoperative FEV1 and DLCO was examined. Subgroup analysis was conducted in redo-operation cases. RESULTS The % uptake of each lobe, except the right middle lobe, showed fair concordance (concordance correlation coefficients for right upper, middle, lower, left upper and lower lobe = 0.61, 0.37, 0.71, 0.66 and 0.69, respectively). ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO also revealed high concordance between both methods (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.93 for ppoFEV1 and concordance correlation coefficient = 0.92 for ppoDLCO) without a significant difference (P = 0.42 for ppoFEV1; P = 0.31 for ppoDLCO). Both ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO showed a significantly high correlation with the actual FEV1 (r = 0.77, P &lt; 0.01 for LPS, r = 0.77, P &lt; 0.01 for SPECT/CT) and DLCO (r = 0.62, P &lt; 0.01 for LPS, r = 0.62, P &lt; 0.01 for SPECT/CT). High concordance of % uptake, ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO was present in redo-operation patients. CONCLUSIONS Both LPS and SPECT/CT showed high predictability for actual postoperative lung function, and LPS showed good performance to estimate ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO with reference to SPECT/CT, even in redo-operation cases.

Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Distribution of Ventilation in Pneumoperitoneum Combined with Steep Trendelenburg Position

Background Pneumoperitoneum and a steep Trendelenburg position during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy have been demonstrated to promote a cranial shift of the diaphragm and the formation of atelectasis in the dorsal parts of the lungs. However, neither an impact of higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on preserving the ventilation in the dorsal region nor its physiologic effects have been fully examined. The authors hypothesized that PEEP of 15 cm H2O during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy might maintain ventilation in the dorsal parts and thus improve lung mechanics. Methods In this randomized controlled study, 48 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy were included in the analysis. Patients were assigned to the conventional PEEP (5 cm H2O) group or the high PEEP (15 cm H2O) group. Regional ventilation was monitored using electrical impedance tomography before and after the establishment of pneumoperitoneum and 20° Trendelenburg position during the surgery. The primary endpoint was the regional ventilation in the dorsal parts of the lungs while the secondary endpoints were lung mechanics and postoperative lung function. Results Compared to that in the conventional PEEP group, the fraction of regional ventilation in the most dorsal region was significantly higher in the high PEEP group during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position (mean values at 20 min after taking Trendelenburg position: conventional PEEP, 5.5 ± 3.9%; high PEEP, 9.9 ± 4.7%; difference, –4.5%; 95% CI, –7.4 to –1.6%; P = 0.004). Concurrently, lower driving pressure (conventional PEEP, 14.9 ± 2.5 cm H2O; high PEEP, 11.5 ± 2.8 cm H2O; P &lt; 0.001), higher lung dynamic compliance, and better oxygenation were demonstrated in the high PEEP group. Postoperative lung function did not differ between the groups. Conclusions Application of a PEEP of 15 cm H2O resulted in more homogeneous ventilation and favorable physiologic effects during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy but did not improve postoperative lung function. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

Role of a digital tool in preoperative lung resection surgery assessment

The assessment of patients likely to undergo lung resection surgery is a multidisciplinary approach involving pulmonologists, surgeons and anaesthesiologists. In thoracic surgery, medical operability is also a calculation of postoperative lung function. A mobile application – PreParAPP MSD – to calculate postoperative lung function has been developed with the endorsement of the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care and with the unconditional support of MSD Italia. Thanks to a simple graphic interface, the calculation becomes fast and intuitive, while the possibility of storing and sharing data in an analytical and computerised way with other clinicians might help with the full assessment of patients without forcing them to undergo several medical examinations. These simple calculated parameters are performed by a minority of clinicians, generally anaesthesiologists. In our facility, there is a team involved in the perioperative evaluation of lung resection surgery (13 pulmonologists, 9 surgeons and 5 anaesthesiologists). In order to evaluate the possible Awareness towards postoperative lung function calculation better, we organised an internal survey with 27 clinicians who are members of such a team before and after the introduction of the PreParAPP MSD. It was found that after the introduction of PreParAPP MSD, the percentage of clinicians involved in postoperative lung function calculation rose from 18% to 70%. The implementation of a digital tool may help to improve guideline adherence, in accordance with other experiences in which such tools represented the start for various quality improvement purposes throughout the medical field.