scholarly journals A Modified Calculation Improves the Accuracy of Predicted Postoperative Lung Function Values in Lung Cancer Patients

Lung ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Schlachtenberger ◽  
F. Doerr ◽  
H. Menghesha ◽  
L. Hagmeyer ◽  
T. Leschczyk ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Preoperative pulmonary function testing is mandatory for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgery. The predicted postoperative FEV1 (ppoFEV1) is used for further risk stratification. We compared the ppoFEV1 with the postoperative FEV1 (postFEV1) in order to improve the calculation of the ppoFEV1. Methods 87 patients voluntarily received an FEV1 assessment 1 year after surgery. ppoFEV1 was calculated according to the Brunelli calculation. Baseline characteristics and surgical procedure were compared in a uni- and multivariate analysis between different accuracy levels of the ppoFEV1. Parameters which remained significant in the multinominal regression analysis were evaluated for a modification of the ppoFEV1 calculation. Results Independent factors for a more inaccurate ppoFEV1 were preoperative active smoking (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, confidence interval (CI) 3.6–6.41; p = 0.01), packyears (OR 4.1, CI 3.6–6.41; p = 0.008), younger age (OR 1.1, CI 1.01–1.12; p = 0.03), and patients undergoing pneumectomy (OR 5.55, CI 1.35–23.6; p = 0.01). For the customized ppoFEV1 we excluded pneumonectomies. For patients < 60 years, an additional lung segment was added to the calculation. ppoFEV1 = preFEV1 × $$1-\left(\frac{\text{Lung segments resected} + 1}{\text{Total number of segments}}\right)$$ 1 - Lung segments resected + 1 Total number of segments . For actively smoking patients with more than 30 packyears we subtracted one lung segment from the calculation ppoFEV1 = PreFEV1 × $$1-\left(\frac{\text{Lung segments resected} - 1}{\text{Total number of segments}}\right)$$ 1 - Lung segments resected - 1 Total number of segments . Conclusion We were able to enhance the predictability of the ppoFEV1 with modifications. The modified ppoFEV1 (1.828 l ± 0.479 l) closely approximates the postFEV1 of 1.823 l ± 0.476 l, (0.27%) while the original ppoFEV1 calculation is at 1.78 l ± 0.53 (2.19%). However, if patients require pneumectomy, more complex techniques to determine the ppoFEV1 should be included to stratify risk.

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 488-495
Author(s):  
Ik Dong Yoo ◽  
Jooyeon Jamie Im ◽  
Yong-An Chung ◽  
Eun Kyung Choi ◽  
Jin Kyung Oh ◽  
...  

Background Predicting postoperative lung function is critical in lung cancer patients. Perfusion scintigraphy has been used to estimate postoperative function after lung resection. Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of the posterior oblique method in relation to other conventional processing methods for predicting postoperative lung function using lung perfusion scintigraphy. Material and Methods Fifty-five patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent lobectomy were enrolled. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) values were obtained from preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests. After performing lung perfusion scintigraphy, predicted FEV1 values were calculated using the segment, conventional, posterior, and posterior oblique methods. Postoperative FEV1 values were compared with predicted FEV1 values. Results The mean value of the preoperative FEV1 was 2.29 L and that of the postoperative FEV1 was 1.89 L. The mean values of the predicted postoperative FEV1 values for the segment, conventional, posterior, and posterior oblique were 1.83 L, 1.94 L, 1.88 L, and 1.89 L, respectively. Between the observed and predicted FEV1 values, there was a strong correlation without significant difference except for conventional method. Bland–Altman analysis showed that segment and posterior methods underestimated the FEV1, whereas conventional and posterior oblique methods overestimated the FEV1. Conclusion Predictions with each processing method of lung perfusion scintigraphy showed nearly similar results to the actual postoperative lung function. The posterior oblique method of lung perfusion scintigraphy showed a very small difference to such an extent as to be equal to the observed FEV1, implying that this method may be applied for predicting postoperative lung function in lung cancer patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-77
Author(s):  
Sevgi Gezici ◽  
Mehmet Ozaslan ◽  
Gurler Akpinar ◽  
Murat Kasap ◽  
Maruf Sanli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document