Lagged cells in alert monkey lateral geniculate nucleus

Five lagged cells were recognized by extracellular recording in the lateral geniculate nucleus of an awake, behaving macaque monkey. Previous reports of lagged cells were all in the anesthetized cat. Both parvocellular and magnocellular lagged cells were observed. Response timing was distributed continuously across the population, and both sustained and transient responses were seen in the magnocellular subpopulation. Cortex thus receives signals with a wide range of timing, which can mediate direction selectivity across multiple dimensions.

Cell types and response timings in the medial interlaminar nucleus and C-layers of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

Previous evidence concerning the physiological cell classes in the medial interlaminar nucleus (MIN) has been conflicting. We reexamined the MIN using standard functional tests to distinguish X-, Y- and W-cells. Discharge patterns to flashing spots also were used to identify some cells as lagged or nonlagged, as previously done for the geniculate A-layers. Also, each cell's response timing (latency and absolute phase) was measured from discharges to a spot undergoing sinusoidal luminance modulation. Of 71 MIN cells, 48% were Y, 27% were W, 8% were X, and 17% were unclassifiable. Lagged and nonlagged discharge profiles were observed in each cell group, with 28% of all cells being lagged. Lagged cells displayed a response suppression and long latency to discharge following spot onset, and a slow decay in firing at spot offset that was often preceded by a transient discharge. These profiles were indistinguishable from those of lagged cells in the A-layers. MIN cells also were heterogeneous in response timing, displaying a range of latency and absolute phase values similar to that in the A-layers. We extended these analyses to 27 cells in the geniculate C-layers. In layer C, 35% of cells were Y, 10% were X, 25% were W, and 30% were unclassifiable. About 11% had lagged profiles, and were X-cells or unclassifiable cells. Layers C1 and C2 contained only W-cells and no lagged profiles. The range of timings in the C-layers was somewhat narrower than in the MIN. Overall, these results show that the MIN contains a greater variety of functional cell classes than heretofore appreciated. Further, it appears that mechanisms which create different timing delays in the A-layers also exist in the MIN and layer C. These timings may contribute to direction selectivity in extrastriate cortex.

Brain-stem influence on visual response of lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

This study examined the influence of the pontomesencephalic peribrachial region (PBR) on the visual response properties of cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). The response of single cells to a stationary flashing light spot was recorded with accompanying electrical stimulation of the PBR. The major objectives were to compare the effects of PBR stimulation on lagged and nonlagged cells, to examine how the visual response pattern of lagged cells could be modified by PBR stimulation and to examine whether the physiological criteria used to classify lagged and nonlagged cells are applicable during increased PBR input to the LGN. During PBR stimulation, the visual response was enhanced to a similar degree for lagged and nonlagged cells and the latency to half-rise of the visual response was reduced, particularly for the lagged X cells. The latency to half-fall of the visual response of lagged cells was not changed by PBR stimulation. Accordingly, the division of LGN cells into lagged and nonlagged cells based on visual response latencies was maintained during PBR stimulation. The initial suppression that a visual stimulus evokes in lagged cells was resistant to the effects of PBR stimulation. For the lagged cells, the largest response increase occurred for the initial part of the visual response. For the nonlagged cells, the largest increase occurred for the tonic part of the response. The results support the hypothesis that the differences in temporal response properties between lagged and nonlagged cells belong to the basic distinctions between these cell classes.

The effect of contrast on the visual response of lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

The response vs. contrast characteristics of different cell classes in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were compared. The luminance of a stationary flashing light spot was varied stepwise while the background luminance was constant. Lagged X cells had lower slope of the response vs. contrast curve (contrast gain), and they reached the midpoint of the response range over which the cells' response varied (dynamic response range) at higher contrasts than nonlagged X cells. These results indicated that nonlagged cells are well suited for detection of small contrasts, whereas lagged cells may discriminate between contrasts over a larger range. The contrast gain and the contrast corresponding to the midpoint of the dynamic response range were similar for X and Y cells. The latency to onset and to half-rise of the visual response decreased with increasing contrast, most pronounced for lagged cells. Even at the highest contrasts, the latency of lagged cells remained longer than for nonlagged cells. For many lagged cells, the latency to half-fall decreased with increasing contrast. It is shown that the differences in the response vs. contrast characteristics between lagged and nonlagged X cells in the cat are similar to the differences between the parvocellular and magnocellular neurones in the monkey.

Evidence of input from lagged cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus to simple cells in cortical area 17 of the cat

1. The visual cortex receives several types of afferents from the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the thalamus. In the cat, previous work studied the ON/OFF and X/Y distinctions, investigating their convergence and segregation in cortex. Here we pursue the lagged/nonlagged dichotomy as it applies to simple cells in area 17. Lagged and nonlagged cells in the A-layers of the LGN can be distinguished by the timing of their responses to sinusoidally luminance-modulated stimuli. We therefore used similar stimuli in cortex to search for signs of lagged and nonlagged inputs to cortical cells. 2. Line-weighting functions were obtained from 37 simple cells. A bar was presented at a series of positions across the receptive field, with the luminance of the bar modulated sinusoidally at a series of temporal frequencies. First harmonic response amplitude and phase values for each position were plotted as a function of temporal frequency. Linear regression on the phase versus temporal frequency data provided estimates of latency (slope) and absolute phase (intercept) for each receptive-field position tested. These two parameters were previously shown to distinguish between lagged and nonlagged LGN cells. Lagged cells generally have latencies > 100 ms and absolute phase lags; nonlagged cells have latencies < 100 ms and absolute phase leads. With the use of these criteria, we classified responses at discrete positions inside cortical receptive fields as lagged-like and nonlagged-like. 3. Both lagged-like and nonlagged-like responses were observed. The majority of cortical cells had only or nearly only nonlagged-like zones. In 15 of the 37 cells, however, the receptive field consisted of > or = 20% lagged-like zones. For eight of these cells, lagged-like responses predominated. 4. The distribution of latency and absolute phase across the sample of cortical simple cell receptive fields resembled the distribution for LGN cells. The resemblance was especially striking when only cells in or adjacent to geniculate recipient layers were considered. Absolute phase lags were almost uniformly associated with long latencies. Absolute phase leads were generally associated with short latencies, although cortical cells responded with long latencies and absolute phase leads slightly more often than LGN cells. 5. Cells in which a high percentage of lagged-like responses were observed had a restricted laminar localization, with all but two being found in layer 4B or 5A. Cells with predominantly nonlagged-like responses were found in all layers. 6. Lagged-like zones can not be easily explained as a result of stimulating combinations of nonlagged inputs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Action of brain stem reticular afferents on lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus

1. The A-laminae of the cat lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) contain two distinct groups of relay neurons: lagged and nonlagged cells. The groups differ in the pattern, timing, and amplitude of response to flashing spots. At spot onset, nonlagged cells discharge at short latency with an excitatory transient; in lagged cells this transient is supplanted by an inhibitory dip and a delayed latency to discharge. At spot offset, lagged cell discharge decays more slowly than in nonlagged cells. Here we have investigated the facilitatory influence of the brain stem reticular formation on the response properties of lagged X-cells (XL) and nonlagged X- and Y-cells (XN and YN). We were particularly interested in whether the inhibitory dip and sluggish response of lagged cells could be reversed during brain stem activation and the cells induced to respond like nonlagged cells. The peribrachial region (PB) of the pontine reticular formation was stimulated electrically with the use of 1,100-ms-long pulse trains that were paired with flashing spot stimuli. 2. Stimulation of PB led to an increase in the amplitude of visually evoked discharge in lagged and nonlagged cells. Compared with their response to spot stimulation alone, the average PB-evoked increase in mean discharge rate was greater than 50% in both groups. The mean discharge rate during PB plus spot stimulation was somewhat higher for XN-cells than for YN- and XL-cells, reflecting the relatively higher discharge rate among XN-cells during spot stimulation alone. 3. Two measures of response timing characterize lagged and nonlagged cells: latency to half-maximal discharge at spot onset (half rise) and latency to half-minimal discharge at spot offset (half fall). Among XN- and YN-cells, PB stimulation had no significant effect on these two latencies; among XL-cells, both latencies were reduced by 43 and 35%, respectively, on average. 4. During spot stimulation alone, all lagged cells were distinguishable from all nonlagged cells in having half-rise and half-fall latencies greater than 60 ms. Despite the reduction among XL-cells in these 2 latencies during PB stimulation, all but 2 of the 40 XL-cells maintained laggedlike latencies. The majority (95%) of XL-cells remained unambiguously lagged on these measures during brain stem stimulation. 5. During spot stimulation alone, 30 of 40 XL-cells tested displayed a prominent and often long-lasting inhibitory dip in discharge starting approximately 45 ms after spot onset. During PB stimulation only three cells lost the dip.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

NMDA and non-NMDA receptors mediate visual responses of neurons in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus

1. We have examined the effects of iontophoresing specific antagonists to excitatory amino acid receptors on the visual responses of cells in lamina A or A1 of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). 2. Cells were classified as On- or Off-center, X or Y, and lagged or nonlagged. The effects of antagonists were studied while cells were stimulated with spots of the appropriate contrast covering the receptive-field center. 3. The N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV) and 3-(+/-)-2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)- propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP), when iontophoresed at doses that specifically antagonized NMDA-induced responses but not kainate-induced responses, reduced the responses of all cell types in the LGN, including X and Y cells, lagged and nonlagged cells, and On- and Off-center cells. 4. The non-NMDA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), when applied at doses that specifically antagonized kainate-induced responses but not NMDA-induced responses, also reduced the visual responses of each of the cell types in the LGN. 5. We analyzed quantitatively the effects of D-APV and CNQX on LGN cells. D-APV reduced the responses of lagged cells to a greater extent than the responses of nonlagged cells. CNQX reduced the responses of lagged and nonlagged cells to a similar extent. There was no difference in the effect of D-APV or of CNQX on X and Y cells or on On- and Off-center cells. 6. We analyzed the effects of the antagonists on separate components of responses, including an early component comprising the first 100 ms of response and a late component comprising the next 300 ms of response. D-APV reduced the late component of lagged cell responses to a greater extent than either the early component of the same cells or the early or late component of nonlagged cells. CNQX had nearly equivalent effects on both response components of all cell types. 7. These data indicate that NMDA and non-NMDA receptors make similar contributions to the responses of On- and Off-center and X and Y cells in the LGN. Lagged and nonlagged cells are not differentiated with respect to the contribution of non-NMDA receptors to their visual responses. The greater contribution of NMDA receptors to the responses of lagged cells is consistent with the large contribution made by these receptors to the late response components of lagged cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)