Background: Vision loss is a major health issue and people with visual impairments are at higher risk for visually related complaints, as poor postural control, accompanying fear of moving and higher risk for falls compared to people with normal vision. Consequently, it is important to develop and improve treatment and prevention programs aimed at reducing these problems. In this endeavour, high quality screening instruments are a prerequisite for successful research and clinical practice. Scope: The aim of this study is to verify the validity level of a new system for assessing the degree of visual disability that provides a numerical score, resulting from a combined assessment of both the Visual Field (VF) and Visual Acuity (VA) loss, obtained using a digital technology visor. Methods: To verify if the assessments of the visual impairment coefficient carried out through the two different systems produce homogeneous results, a comparison between results obtained on a group of sixty-five subjects who were visually impaired or had fragile vision was performed. Results: A great level of inhomogeneities in the evaluation of visual disability coefficient, obtained through the digital system, which provides for the combined evaluation of the visual field and visual acuity, and the conventional one, which involves the separate evaluation of the two parameters, was found. Conclusions: These results confirm therefore that the discrepancies found in the assessment of the disability level obtained through two different systems is not due to the different tools used, but to the different evaluation systems. The evaluation system carried out using the new digital visor, which provides for the combined evaluation of the VF and VA, constitutes a method to ensure a more homogeneous and reliable visual disability assessment compared to those carried out with traditional systems.