Measuring Livestock CH4 Emissions with the Laser Methane Detector: A Review

The handheld, portable laser methane detector (LMD) was developed to detect gas leaks in industry from a safe distance. Since 2009, it has also been used to measure the methane (CH4) concentration in the breath of cattle, sheep, and goats to quantify their CH4 emissions. As there is no consensus on a uniform measurement and data-analysis protocol with the LMD, this article discusses important aspects of the measurement, the data analysis, and the applications of the LMD based on the literature. These aspects, such as the distance to the animal or the activity of the animals, should be fixed for all measurements of an experiment, and if this is not possible, they should at least be documented and considered as fixed effects in the statistical analysis. Important steps in data processing are thorough quality control and reduction in records to a single point measurement or “phenotype” for later analysis. The LMD can be used to rank animals according to their CH4 breath concentration and to compare average CH4 production at the group level. This makes it suitable for genetic and nutritional studies and for characterising different breeds and husbandry systems. The limitations are the lower accuracy compared to other methods, as only CH4 concentration and not flux can be measured, and the high amount of work required for the measurement. However, due to its flexibility and non-invasiveness, the LMD can be an alternative in environments where other methods are not suitable or a complement to other methods. It would improve the applicability of the LMD method if there were a common protocol for measurement and data analysis developed jointly by a group of researchers.

The Development of a Low-Cost Method for Monitoring Methane Leakage from the Subsurface of Natural Gas Fields

The leakage of methane from the subsurface on the coalfield or natural gas field invariably becomes an important issue nowadays. In notable addition, materials such as activated carbon, zeolites, and Porapak have been successfully identified as adsorbents. Those adsorbents could adsorb methane at atmospheric pressure and room temperature. Therefore, in this scholarly study, a new method using adsorbents to detect points of methane leakage that can cover a wide-scale area was developed. In the beginning, the most capable adsorbent should be determined by quantifying adsorbed methane amount. Furthermore, checking the possibility of adsorption in the column diffusion and desorption method of adsorbents is equally necessary. The most capable adsorbent was activated carbon (AC), which can adsorb 1.187 × 10−3 mg-CH4/g-AC. Hereinafter, activated carbon successfully can adsorb methane through column diffusion, which simulates the situation of on-site measurement. The specific amount of adsorbed methane when the initial concentrations of CH4 in a bag were 200 ppm, 100 ppm, and 50 ppm was found to be 0.818 × 10−3 mg-CH4/g-AC, 0.397 × 10−3 mg-CH4/g-AC, 0.161 × 10−3 mg-CH4/g-AC, respectively. Desorption of activated carbon analysis shows that methane concentration increases during an hour in the temperature bath under 80 °C. In conclusion, soil methane leakage points can be detected using activated carbon by identifying the observed methane concentration increase.

Mechanisms, Growth Rates, and Morphologies of Gas Hydrates of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Their Mixtures

Mechanisms of growth and dissociation, growth rates, and morphology of gas hydrates of methane, carbon dioxide, and two CH4:CO2 mixtures (80:20 and 30:70 nominal concentration) were studied using using high resolution images and very precise temperature control. Subcooling and a recently proposed mass transfer-based driving force were used to analyze the results. When crystal growth rates did not exceed 0.01 mm/s, all systems showed faceted, euhedral crystal habits at low driving forces. At higher driving forces and growth rates, morphologies were different for all systems. These results solve apparent contradictions in literature about the morphology of hydrates of methane, carbon dioxide, and their mixtures. Differences in the growth mechanism of methane-rich and carbon dioxide-rich hydrates were elucidated. It was also shown that hydrate growth of methane, carbon dioxide, and their mixtures proceed via partial dissociation of the growing crystal. Temperature gradients were used to dissociate hydrates at specific locations, which revealed a most interesting phenomenon: On dissociation, carbon dioxide-rich hydrates propagated onto the bare substrate while drawing water from the opposite side of the sample. Furthermore, it was shown that an abrupt change in morphology common to all systems could be correlated to a change in the slope of growth rate data. This change in morphology was explained by a shift in the crystal growth mechanism.

Publisher’s Note: Methane—An Open Access Journal

During his doctoral studies (July 1989–January 1993) at the ETH Zurich, under the supervision of Prof [...]