scholarly journals Prevalence of Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Susceptibility Genes Among Women With Postmenopausal Breast Cancer

JAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 323 (10) ◽  
pp. 995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison W. Kurian ◽  
Ryan Bernhisel ◽  
Katie Larson ◽  
Jennifer L. Caswell-Jin ◽  
Aladdin H. Shadyab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Postmenopausal Breast Cancer ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes

scholarly journals A novel high-throughput assay using mixed genomic DNA for fast screening germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiting Wan ◽  
Li Hu ◽  
Lu Yao ◽  
Jiuan Chen ◽  
Jie Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Breast Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
High Throughput Assay

The demand for genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes is increasing for both breast cancer patients and healthy individuals. Here we established a novel high-throughput assay to detect germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes. In general, up 10 to 50 individual genomic DNA samples were mixed together to create a mixed DNA sample and the mixed DNA sample was subjected to a next-generation multigene panel. Germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes could be found in the mixed DNA sample; next, site-specific Sanger sequencing was performed to identify individuals who carried he pathogenic variant in the mixed samples. We found that the recall and precision rates were 89.9% and 92.9% when twenty individual genomic samples were mixed. Therefore, our new assay can increase an approximately 20-fold of efficacy to identify the pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes in individuals when compared with current assay.

scholarly journals Li-Fraumeni syndrome: not a straightforward diagnosis anymore—the interpretation of pathogenic variants of low allele frequency and the differences between germline PVs, mosaicism, and clonal hematopoiesis

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Batalini ◽  
Ellie G. Peacock ◽  
Lindsey Stobie ◽  
Alison Robertson ◽  
Judy Garber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Somatic Mosaicism ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Li Fraumeni Syndrome ◽  
Clonal Hematopoiesis ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes

Abstract The introduction of next-generation sequencing has resulted in testing multiple genes simultaneously to identify inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer susceptibility genes. PVs with low minor allele frequencies (MAFs) (< 25–35%) are highlighted on germline genetic test reports. In this review, we focus on the challenges of interpreting PVs with low MAF in breast cancer patients undergoing germline testing and the implications for management. The clinical implications of a germline PV are substantial. For PV carriers in high-penetrance genes like BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53, prophylactic mastectomy is often recommended and radiation therapy avoided when possible for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). For germline PV carriers in more moderate-risk genes such as PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2, annual breast MRI is recommended and prophylactic mastectomies considered for those with significant family histories. Detection of PVs in cancer susceptibility genes can also lead to recommendations for other prophylactic surgeries (e.g., salpingo-oophorectomy) and increased surveillance for other cancers. Therefore, recognizing when a PV is somatic rather than germline and distinguishing somatic mosaicism from clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is essential. Mutational events that occur at a post-zygotic stage are somatic and will only be present in tissues derived from the mutated cell, characterizing classic mosaicism. Clonal hematopoiesis is a form of mosaicism restricted to the hematopoietic compartment. Among the genes in multi-gene panels used for germline testing of breast cancer patients, the detection of a PV with low MAF occurs most often in TP53, though has been reported in other breast cancer susceptibility genes. Distinguishing a germline TP53 PV (LFS) from a somatic PV (TP53 mosaicism or CH) has enormous implications for breast cancer patients and their relatives. We review how to evaluate a PV with low MAF. The identification of the PV in another tissue confirms mosaicism. Older age, exposure to chemotherapy, radiation, and tobacco are known risk factors for CH, as is the absence of a LFS-related cancer in the setting of a TP53 PV with low MAF. The ability to recognize and understand the implications of somatic PVs, including somatic mosaicism and CH, enables optimal personalized care of breast cancer patients.

Breast cancer treatment according to pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes in a population-based cohort.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 560-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison W. Kurian ◽  
Kevin C. Ward ◽  
Paul Abrahamse ◽  
Ann S Hamilton ◽  
Dennis Deapen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Genetic Test ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
To Receive

560 Background: Increasing use of germline genetic testing may have unintended consequences on breast cancer treatment. We do not know whether treatment deviates from guidelines for women with pathogenic variants (PV) in cancer susceptibility genes. Methods: SEER data for all women aged ≥20 years, diagnosed with breast cancer in 2014-15 and reported to Georgia and California registries (N = 77,588) by December 1, 2016 were linked to germline genetic testing results from 4 laboratories that did nearly all clinical testing. We examined first course of therapy (before recurrence or progression) of stage < IV patients who linked to a genetic test: bilateral mastectomy (BLM) in candidates for surgery (unilateral, stages 0-III); post-lumpectomy radiation in those with an indication (all but age ≥70, stage I, hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative); and chemotherapy in those without a definitive indication (stage I-II, HR-positive, HER2-negative and 21-gene recurrence score < 30). We report the percent treated based on multivariable modeling, adjusted for age, race, stage, grade, insurance and socioeconomic status. Results: The table shows that 9% of patients who linked to a genetic test result had a PV (N = 1,283). Compared to women with negative results,women with BRCA1/2 PVs were more likely to receive BLM, more likely to receive chemotherapy without definitive indication, and less likely to receive indicated radiation in their first course of therapy. Lower-magnitude effects were seen with other PVs but not variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Conclusions: In a population-based setting, women with PVs in BRCA1/2 or other cancer susceptibility genes may have a higher risk of receiving locoregional and systemic treatment that does not follow guidelines. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk

2020 ◽  
pp. 585-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisha Hughes ◽  
Placede Tshiaba ◽  
Shannon Gallagher ◽  
Susanne Wagner ◽  
Thaddeus Judkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Breast Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Cancer History ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes

PURPOSE Women with a family history of breast cancer are frequently referred for hereditary cancer genetic testing, yet < 10% are found to have pathogenic variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Large-scale genotyping studies have identified common variants (primarily single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]) with individually modest breast cancer risk that, in aggregate, account for considerable breast cancer susceptibility. Here, we describe the development and empirical validation of an SNP-based polygenic breast cancer risk score. METHODS A panel of 94 SNPs was examined for association with breast cancer in women of European ancestry undergoing hereditary cancer genetic testing and negative for pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes. Candidate polygenic risk scores (PRSs) as predictors of personal breast cancer history were developed through multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, cancer history, and ancestry. An optimized PRS was validated in 2 independent cohorts (n = 13,174; n = 141,160). RESULTS Within the training cohort (n = 24,259), 4,291 women (18%) had a personal history of breast cancer and 8,725 women (36%) reported breast cancer in a first-degree relative. The optimized PRS included 86 variants and was highly predictive of breast cancer status in both validation cohorts ( P = 6.4 × 10−66; P < 10−325). The odds ratio (OR) per unit standard deviation was consistent between validations (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.52]; OR 1.47 [95% CI, 1.45 to 1.49]). In a direct comparison, the 86-SNP PRS outperformed a previously described PRS of 77 SNPs. CONCLUSION The validation and implementation of a PRS for women without pathogenic variants in known breast cancer susceptibility genes offers potential for risk stratification to guide surveillance recommendations.

scholarly journals Germline Mutations in a Clinic-based Series of Pregnancy Associated Breast Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Zografos ◽  
Anna-Maria Korakiti ◽  
Angeliki Andrikopoulou ◽  
Ioannis Rellias ◽  
Constantine Dimitrakakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Genetic Predisposition ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Germline Mutations ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes

Abstract Background: Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) defined as breast cancer diagnosed during gestation, lactation or within one year after delivery, represents a truly challenging situation with significantly increasing incidence rate. The genomic background of PABC has only recently been addressed while the underlying mechanisms of the disease still remain unknown. This analysis aims to further elucidate the frequency of PABC cases attributable to genetic predisposition and identify specific cancer susceptibility genes characterizing PABC.Methods: A comprehensive 94-cancer gene panel was implemented in a cohort of 20 PABC patients treated in our clinic and descriptive correlation was performed among the results and the patients’ clinicopathological data. Results: In the present study, 35% of PABC patients tested carried pathogenic mutations in two known cancer predisposition genes (BRCA1 and CHEK2). In total, 30% of the patients carried BRCA1 pathogenic variants. An additional 5% carried pathogenic variants in the CHEK2 gene. Variants of unknown/uncertain significance (VUS) in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA2, CHEK2 and BRIP1 were also identified in three different PABC patients (15%). Not all patients carrying germline mutations reported known family history of cancer.Conclusions: Genetic testing should be offered to PABC patients regardless of family history as the disease is highly associated with genetic predisposition. Germline mutation identification may further modify PABC management approach and improve the prognostic outcome.

Adherence to breast cancer treatment guidelines according to pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes in a population-based cohort.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 34-34
Author(s):  
Steven J. Katz ◽  
Monica Morrow ◽  
Allison W. Kurian
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Genetic Test ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
To Receive

34 Background: Increasing use of germline genetic testing may have unintended consequences on breast cancer treatment. We do not know whether treatment deviates from guidelines for women with pathogenic variants (PV) in cancer susceptibility genes. Methods: SEER data for all women aged ≥20 years, diagnosed with breast cancer in 2014-15 and reported to Georgia and California registries (N=77,588) by December 1, 2016 were linked to germline genetic testing results from 4 laboratories that did nearly all clinical testing. We examined first course of therapy of stage <IV patients who linked to a genetic test: bilateral mastectomy (BLM) in candidates for surgery (unilateral, stages 0-III); post-lumpectomy radiation in those with an indication (all but age ≥70, stage I, hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative); and chemotherapy in those without definitive indication (stage I-II, HR-positive, HER2-negative and 21-gene recurrence score <30). We report the percent treated based on multivariable modeling, adjusted for age, race, stage, grade, insurance and socioeconomic status. Results: The table shows that 9% of patients who linked to a genetic test result had a PV (N=1,283). Compared to women with negative results, those with BRCA1/2 PVs were more likely to receive BLM, more likely to receive chemotherapy without definitive indication, and less likely to receive indicated radiation as initial treatment. Lower-magnitude effects were seen with other PVs but not variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Conclusions: In a population-based setting, women with PVs in BRCA1/2 or other cancer susceptibility genes may have higher risk of receiving locoregional and systemic treatment that does not follow guidelines. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document