Preimplantation genetic testing for BRCA gene mutation carriers: a cost effectiveness analysis

Background Gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the option of conception through IVF/PGT-M for families with high BRCA related morbidity or mortality. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for selection and transfer of BRCA negative embryo in BRCA mutation carriers compared to natural conception. Methods Cost-effectiveness of two strategies, conception through IVF/PGT-M and BRCA negative embryo transfer versus natural conception with a 50% chance of BRCA positive newborn for BRCA mutation carriers was compared using a Markovian process decision analysis model. Costs of the two strategies were compared using quality adjusted life years (QALYs’). All costs were discounted at 3%. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to willingness to pay threshold was used for cost-effectiveness analysis. Results IVF/ PGT-M is cost-effective with an ICER of 150,219 new Israeli Shekels, per QALY gained (equivalent to 44,480 USD), at a 3% discount rate. Conclusions IVF/ PGT-M and BRCA negative embryo transfer compared to natural conception among BRCA positive parents is cost effective and may be offered for selected couples with high BRCA mutation related morbidity or mortality. Our results could impact decisions regarding conception among BRCA positive couples and health care providers.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for BRCA Gene Mutation Carriers: a Cost Effectiveness Analysis

Background: Gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the option of conception through IVF/PGT-M for families with high BRCA related morbidity or mortality. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for selection and transfer of BRCA negative embryo in BRCA mutation carriers compared to natural conception.Methods: Cost-effectiveness of two strategies, conception through IVF/PGT-M and BRCA negative embryo transfer versus natural conception with a 50% chance of BRCA positive newborn for BRCA mutation carriers was compared using a Markovian process decision analysis model. Costs of the two strategies were compared using quality adjusted life years (QALYs'). All costs were discounted at 3%. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to willingness to pay threshold was used for cost-effectiveness analysis.Results: IVF/ PGT-M is cost-effective with an ICER of 150,219 new Israeli Shekels, per QALY gained (equivalent to 44,480 USD), at a 3% discount rate. Conclusions: IVF/ PGT-M and BRCA negative embryo transfer compared to natural conception among BRCA positive parents is cost effective and may be offered for selected couples with high BRCA mutation related morbidity or mortality. Our results could impact decisions regarding conception among BRCA positive couples and health care providers

Detecting Variants in the NBN Gene While Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer: What to Do Next?

The NBN gene has been included in breast cancer (BC) multigene panels based on early studies suggesting an increased BC risk for carriers, though not confirmed by recent research. To evaluate the impact of NBN analysis, we assessed the results of NBN sequencing in 116 BRCA-negative BC patients and reviewed the literature. Three patients (2.6%) carried potentially relevant variants: two, apparently unrelated, carried the frameshift variant c.156_157delTT and another one the c.628G>T variant. The latter was subsequently found in 4/1390 (0.3%) BC cases and 8/1580 (0.5%) controls in an independent sample, which, together with in silico predictions, provided evidence against its pathogenicity. Conversely, the rare c.156_157delTT variant was absent in the case-control set; moreover, a 50% reduction of NBN expression was demonstrated in one carrier. However, in one family it failed to co-segregate with BC, while the other carrier was found to harbor also a probably pathogenic TP53 variant that may explain her phenotype. Therefore, the c.156_157delTT, although functionally deleterious, was not supported as a cancer-predisposing defect. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic NBN variants were detected by multigene panels in 31/12314 (0.25%) patients included in 15 studies. The risk of misinterpretation of such findings is substantial and supports the exclusion of NBN from multigene panels.

Preimplantation genetic testing for BRCA gene mutation carriers: a cost effectiveness analysis

Objective: Gynecologic oncologists should be aware of the option of conception through IVF/PGT-M for families with high BRCA related morbidity or mortality. Our objective was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for selection and transfer of BRCA negative embryo in BRCA mutation carriers compared to natural conception. Design: Markovian process decision analysis model comparing two strategies, conception through IVF/PGT-M and BRCA negative embryo transfer and natural conception with a 50% chance of BRCA positive newborn. Setting: Not applicable Population: Theoretical couple, with either one parent carrying a BRCA germ line mutation. Intervention: None Methods: Costs of two strategies were compared using quality adjusted life years (QALYs’). All costs were discounted at 3%. Main outcome measure: Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to willingness to pay threshold was used for cost-effectiveness analysis. Results: IVF/ PGT-M is cost-effective with an ICER of 150,219 new Israeli Shekels, per QALY gained (equivalent to 44,480 USD), at a 3% discount rate. Conclusion: IVF/ PGT-M and BRCA negative embryo transfer compared to natural conception among BRCA positive parents is cost effective and should be considered for selected couples with high BRCA mutation related morbidity. Funding: No funding of any kind was received for this article

Outcome of patients with breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation in a prospective cohort.

1544 Background: There are limited large prospective single institution studies on outcome of breast cancer in patients with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with breast cancer. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients with invasive breast cancer recruited from the UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Breast Medical Oncology and Clinical Cancer Genetics Center. For the purpose of this analysis, newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who have had germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing within 12 months were included. Clinical and pathological data, and data regarding outcomes were collected in this prospective cohort. The Kaplan-Meier method and corresponding log-rank test were used to estimate OS and RFS and to compare survival by mutation status. Results: Between 1996 and 2015, 3026 patients were recruited. Median age at diagnosis was 45 (19-87) years. A germline BRCA mutation was detected in 361 (11.9%) patients (207 with BRCA1, 154 with BRCA2). After a median follow-up time of 5.3 (0.04-20.7) years, 437 (14.4%) patients recurred and 340 (11.2%) were deceased. At median follow-up time 5 years, 79.3% of BRCA1, 91.4% of BRCA2 and 89.6% of BRCA negative patients were disease free; this difference was significant (p = 0.0001). Difference in OS between BRCA1/2-positive and BRCA-negative patients was also significant (p = 0.0001), with 81.2% of BRCA1, 93.4% of BRCA2 and 90% of BRCA negative patients being alive at 5 years. Amongst 600 patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, DFS and OS were not significantly different between the 3 groups. Of those patients diagnosed under 40 years (n = 937), RFS and OS was significantly different between 3 groups at 5 years (0.001 for RFS and OS); 75% BRCA1, 92% BRCA2 and 86% BRCA negative patients were disease free and 77% BRCA1, 94% BRCA2 and 88% BRCA negative patients were alive. Conclusions: Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations have different survival outcomes. The prognosis of the first cancer needs to be taken into consideration when deciding for preventive surgeries to prevent second primary breast cancers in these patients. Furthermore, for BRCA1 mutation carriers more effective therapy strategies need to be evaluated to improve outcome.

The prognostic role of somatic BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer: Preliminary results from an observational multicenter cohort study.

e13674 Background: BRCA germline (gBRCA) mutations occur in 11-15% of women with unselected ovarian cancers (OC), whereas somatic BRCA (sBRCA) mutations occur in approximately 5-7% of cases. The impact of sBRCA mutations on OC outcome is still debated. Methods: With the aim to explore the prognostic role of sBRCA mutations, the BRCA mutational status of 149 non-mucinous and non-borderline OC and their clinical-pathological features were evaluated. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational profiles, either for sequence variants or copy number alterations, were evaluated by amplicon next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. Results: 29 (19.5%) patients carried a gBRCA mutation (12.7% BRCA1 and 6.7% BRCA2). 26 (17.5%) patients presented a sBRCA mutation (6.7% BRCA1, 10% BRCA2, 0.6% BRCA1+BRCA2). Patients carrying a gBRCA mutation were slightly younger (57 years) than the others (60 years). The FIGO stage at the diagnosis was III-IV in 77.2% of cases, with no significant difference among subgroups. The most frequent histotype was serous for all the subgroups (93.1% in gBRCA, 84.6% in sBRCA, 77.7% in BRCA-negative, p = 0.08). 80.7% of sBRCA mutation carriers, 62.1% of gBRCA mutation carriers and 62.7% of BRCA-negative patients underwent upfront surgery (p = 0.46). 29.1% of sBRCA mutation carriers, 17.8% of gBRCA mutation carriers and 25.6% of BRCA-negative patients presented macroscopic residual disease after surgery (p = 0.68). Although non-statistically significant, gBRCA-associated OC were more likely to be platinum-sensitive (96.6%) than the other patients (92% in sBRCA and 87.1% in BRCA-negative patients). Overall, the median platinum-free interval (PFI) resulted shorter in sBRCA mutation patients compared to gBRCA and BRCA-negative patients (p = 0.051). No patient took PARP inhibitors as maintenance after the first line therapy. Also progression free survival 2 (PFS2) resulted shorter for sBRCA mutation patients (p = 0.008). Three sBRCA and 5 gBRCA mutation carriers took a PARP inhibitor as maintenance after the second line therapy. Finally, sBRCA mutated patients showed worse overall survival (OS) compared to the other subgroups (p = 0.014). Conclusions: Overall, 19.5% of OC patients presented a gBRCA mutation, while 17.5% of patients showed sBRCA mutations. sBRCA-related OC did not show significantly differences in clinical-pathological features (stage at diagnosis, histotype, time to surgery and residual after surgery). To our knowledge this is the first study showing shorter PFI, PFS2 and OS in patients carrying sBRCA mutations.