scholarly journals Effects of Interdisciplinary Team Care Interventions on General Medical Wards

2015 ◽  
Vol 175 (8) ◽  
pp. 1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Pannick ◽  
Rachel Davis ◽  
Hutan Ashrafian ◽  
Ben E. Byrne ◽  
Iain Beveridge ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 227-234
Author(s):  
Catherine Allaire ◽  
Alicia Jean Long ◽  
Mohamed A. Bedaiwy ◽  
Paul J. Yong

AbstractEndometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain can at times be a complex problem that is resistant to standard medical and surgical therapies. Multiple comorbidities and central sensitization may be at play and must be recognized with the help of a thorough history and physical examination. If a complex pain problem is identified, most endometriosis expert reviews and guidelines recommend multidisciplinary care. However, there are no specific recommendations about what should be the components of this approach and how that type of team care should be delivered. There is evidence showing the effectiveness of specific interventions such as pain education, physical therapy, psychological therapies, and pharmacotherapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Interdisciplinary team models have been well studied and validated in other chronic pain conditions such as low back pain. The published evidence in support of interdisciplinary teams for endometriosis-associated chronic pain is more limited but appears promising. Based on the available evidence, a model for an interdisciplinary team approach for endometriosis care is outlined.


1999 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 1145-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Counsell ◽  
Robert D. Kennedy ◽  
Peggy Szwabo ◽  
Nancy S. Wadswortb ◽  
Clare Wohlgemutb

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 228-228
Author(s):  
Amanda Marie Parkes ◽  
Cathy Lee-Miller

228 Background: Conventional health care models inadequately address the complex needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs, defined as patients aged 15-39) with cancer, thus necessitating AYA programs. While grounded in the integration of medical and psychosocial care, the best AYA care model has not been identified. We sought to evaluate the comparative impact of one-on-one AYA clinic visits versus interdisciplinary team care on AYA-specific resource identification. Methods: We identified patients seen at the University of Wisconsin (UW) AYA Oncology program between 1/21/2021-5/13/2021. Patients in this program have a one-on-one clinic visit with an AYA physician followed four days later by case presentation at an AYA interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting. We conducted retrospective chart review to evaluate novel resources identified by the AYA IDT meeting versus those previously identified during the one-on-one AYA clinic visit. Resources identified had to be novel from those already used by or identified for the patient. Results: We identified 32 patients seen by the UW AYA Oncology program. Prior to their AYA clinic visit, patients saw an average of 2.0 AYA-specific services (range 0-6, defined as those services listed in table). As seen in table, an average of 2.8 novel AYA-specific resources were identified for each patient (range 0-5) during the one-on-one AYA clinic visit. Following the AYA IDT meeting, additional novel resources were identified in 100% of patients, with an average of 2.6 additional resources identified per patient (range 1-7). Considering all resources identified by the AYA Oncology program (clinic visit + IDT), an average of 5.4 novel resources were identified per patient (range 2-10). AYA-Specific Resource Identification (n=32). Conclusions: Supporting the importance of dedicated AYA care models, we found that all patients in our study had novel AYA-specific resources identified by the UW AYA Oncology program. Resources identified by the physician-led one-on-one AYA clinic visit were not comprehensive as additional resources were identified for each patient at the AYA IDT meeting only four days later. These objective data support the critical importance of AYA interdisciplinary care as well as the use of an AYA IDT meeting model as a method to include interdisciplinary team care in AYA programs despite possible resource constraints.[Table: see text]


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 482-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Ellington ◽  
Margaret F. Clayton ◽  
Maija Reblin ◽  
Kristin Cloyes ◽  
Anna C. Beck ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 850-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriane L. Baylis ◽  
Jamie Perry ◽  
Kristina Wilson ◽  
Scott Dailey ◽  
Anne Bedwinek ◽  
...  

Purpose This article aims to provide a set of guiding principles for interdisciplinary team care of velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) for speech, regardless of the etiology. Method A working group of practitioners with advanced training and experience in the management of patients with cleft palate/velopharyngeal disorders, including representatives from speech-language pathology, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery, was formed. Pertinent literature was reviewed, and practical suggestions for clinicians were developed through consensus discussion. Results Seven key principles were identified as being integral to the provision of interdisciplinary team care for VPI. Conclusion Collaborative interdisciplinary team care for persons with velopharyngeal disorders is key to optimal management and outcomes. Practical suggestions for implementing an interdisciplinary team care model for management of cleft-related and noncleft VPI are described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document