scholarly journals Stroke liaison workers for stroke patients and carers: an individual patient data meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Graham Ellis ◽  
Jonathan Mant ◽  
Peter Langhorne ◽  
Martin Dennis ◽  
Simon Winner
Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M Bath ◽  
Lisa J Woodhouse ◽  
Sonja Suntrup-Krueger ◽  
Shaheen Hamdy ◽  
Rainer Dziewas

Background: Dysphagia is common after stroke and associated with a poor outcome. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) increased decannulation rates in tracheotomised stroke patients with dysphagia following ventilation in two trials. We report the results of an individual patient data meta-analysis assessing PES in severely dysphagic tracheotomised stroke patients. Methods: We searched for randomised controlled trials of PES in dysphagic tracheotomised stroke patients and obtained individual patient data for demographic and clinical (stroke severity, NIHSS; functional oral intake scale, FOIS; decannulation) variables from trialists. Data are number (%), median [interquartile range], mean (standard deviation) and mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Two completed trials were identified (n=30, PHAST-TRAC n=69 [funded by Phagenesis Ltd]), with data for 99 participants (PES 55, 56%; sham 44, 44%). Mean age 64 (13) years, female 40 (40%), NIHSS 18 [14-21], time from onset to randomisation 27 days [20-38], and FOIS=1 (nil by mouth). As compared with sham, PES was associated with an increased proportion of patients who were ready for early decannulation, 59% versus 11% (OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.86-33.33; p<0.001) and improved FOIS score at discharge (MD 1.13, 95% CI 0.25-2.00; p=0.011). Treated participants who were ready for decannulation tended to have a shorter hospital length of stay: 23 vs 41 days (p=0.070) than those who were not ready. No device-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: PES was associated with an increased proportion of stroke patients who were ready for decannulation and less dysphagia, in two randomised trials.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P. Appleton ◽  
Lisa J. Woodhouse ◽  
Nikola Sprigg ◽  
Joanna M. Wardlaw ◽  
Philip M. Bath

Background: Thrombolysis, with or without thrombectomy, for acute ischaemic stroke is associated with an increased risk of intracranial bleeding. We assessed whether treatment with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a nitric oxide donor, may influence the associated bleeding risk.Methods: We searched for completed randomized controlled trials of GTN vs. no GTN in acute ischaemic stroke with data on reperfusion treatments (thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy). The primary efficacy outcome was functional status as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at day 90; the primary safety outcome was intracranial bleeding. Secondary safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and haemorrhagic transformation of infarction. Individual patient data were pooled and meta-analysis performed using ordinal or binary logistic regression with adjustment for trial and prognostic variables both overall and in those randomized within 6 h of symptom onset.Results: Three trials met the eligibility criteria. Of 715 patients with ischaemic stroke who underwent thrombolysis (709, &gt;99%) or thrombectomy (24, 3.4%), 357 (49.9%) received GTN and 358 (50.1%) received no GTN. Overall, there was no difference in the distribution of the mRS at day 90 between GTN vs. no GTN (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72–1.23; p = 0.65); similarly, there was no difference in intracranial hemorrhage rates between treatment groups (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43–1.89; p = 0.77). In those randomized to GTN vs. no GTN within 6 h of symptom onset, there were numerically fewer bleeding events, but these analyses did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions: In ischaemic stroke patients treated predominantly with thrombolysis, transdermal GTN was safe, but did not influence functional outcome at 90 days.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Bisson ◽  
Mayara Bastos ◽  
Jonathon R. Campbell ◽  
Didi Bang ◽  
James C. Brust ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein Ankersmit ◽  
Martijn W. Heymans ◽  
Otto Hoekstra ◽  
Stijn L. Vlek ◽  
Linda J. Schoonmade ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document