Evidence-Based Psychopharmacology for the Collaborative Care Team

2016 ◽  
pp. 238-291
Author(s):  
David A. Harrison ◽  
Anna Ratzliff
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Evidence Based

scholarly journals Critical care of subarachnoid haemorrhage

2017 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
pp. S49-S55
Author(s):  
Michael Souter
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Subarachnoid Haemorrhage ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Neurocritical Care ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
The Brain

AbstractSubarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is a consistent presentation of haemorrhagic stroke of significance to clinicians in neurocritical care, inducing consequent effects on non-neurological systems, while at the same time, rendering the brain vulnerable to secondary physiological insult modifying neurological outcome, despite control of the original point of haemorrhage. Coordinated treatment depends on comprehensive evaluation of both cerebral and systemic physiology, identifying and treating impaired function. The presence of a dedicated neurocritical care team can benefit outcome. Protocols of care have evolved to meet evidence-based challenges, discarding potentially deleterious components of hypervolaemia and haemodilution, while maintaining pressure-guided perfusion. Treatment targets have also evolved with a shift in focus away from SAH-associated vasospasm, towards actual ischaemic outcome – illustrated by lack of effectiveness of pharmaceutical treatments of vasospasm. Clinicians must consequently review pathophysiological mechanisms of injury and devise new treatment opportunities.

scholarly journals A social marketing approach to implementing evidence-based practice in VHA QUERI: the TIDES depression collaborative care model

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Luck ◽  
Fred Hagigi ◽  
Louise E Parker ◽  
Elizabeth M Yano ◽  
Lisa V Rubenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Marketing ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Collaborative Care Model ◽  
Marketing Approach

The Collaborative Care Team in Action

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Raney ◽  
Gina Lasky ◽  
Clare Scott
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Care Team

scholarly journals Evidence-Based Approaches to Suicide in Older Adults—Collaborative Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 625-625
Author(s):  
Michael Schoenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Mental Health Treatment ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Health Treatment ◽  
Collaborative Care Model

Abstract This individual symposium abstract will focus another evidence-based approach to mental health treatment and in older adults, the collaborative care model. Collaborative care is a consultation-based approach in primary care that has been described with multiple clinical trials, with significant benefit for access and treatment. The Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial (PROSPECT) using the collaborative care model found that those older adults receiving the intervention had a higher utilization of mental health treatment (psychotherapy and/or antidepressant treatment) and had a 2.2 times greater decline in suicidal ideation over 24 months. The authors will describe the utility of using the collaborative care model on the identification of suicidal ideation and subsequent mental health treatment for older adults. The authors will also share about challenges and successes related to collaborative care implementation in healthcare settings for older adults, and relevant policy and financing components for the model.

scholarly journals All members of primary care team are aware of importance of evidence based medicine

BMJ ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 317 (7153) ◽  
pp. 282-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hagdrup ◽  
M. Falshaw ◽  
R. W Gray ◽  
Y. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Evidence Based Medicine ◽  
Care Team ◽  
Primary Care Team ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Based Medicine

scholarly journals A Roadmap to Inform the Implementation of Evidence-Based Collaborative Care Interventions in Communities: Insights From the Michigan Mental Health Integration Partnership

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Rusch ◽  
Lindsay M. DeCamp ◽  
Celeste M. Liebrecht ◽  
Seo Youn Choi ◽  
Gregory W. Dalack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Project Teams ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Mental Health Integration ◽  
Implementation Steps

Background: Despite increasing calls for further spread of evidence-based collaborative care interventions (EBIs) in community-based settings, practitioner-driven efforts are often stymied by a lack of experience in addressing barriers to community-based implementation, especially for those not familiar with implementation science. The Michigan Mental Health Integration Partnership (MIP) is a statewide initiative that funds projects that support implementation and uptake of EBIs in community-based settings. MIP also provides an in situ implementation laboratory for understanding barriers to the uptake of EBIs across a variety of settings. We report findings from a statewide qualitative study of practitioners involved in MIP projects to garner their perspectives of best practices in the implementation of EBIs.Methods: Twenty-eight semi-structured interviews of practitioners and researchers from six MIP Projects were conducted with individuals implementing various MIP EBI projects across Michigan, including stakeholders from project teams, implementation sites, and the State of Michigan, to identify common barriers, challenges, and implementation strategies deployed by the project teams, with the purpose of informing a set of implementation steps and milestones.Results: Stakeholders identified a number of barriers to and strategies for success, including the need for tailoring program deployment and implementation to specific site needs, development of web-based tools for facilitating program implementation, and the importance of upper-level administration buy-in. Findings informed our resultant community-based Implementation Roadmap, which identifies critical steps across three implementation phases—pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainability—for implementation practitioners to use in their EBI implementation efforts.Conclusion: Implementation practitioners interested in community-based EBI implementation often lack access to operationalized implementation “steps” or “best practices” that can facilitate successful uptake and evaluation. Our community-informed MIP Implementation Roadmap, offering generalized steps for reaching successful implementation, uses experiences from a diverse set of MIP teams to guide practitioners through the practices necessary for scaling up EBIs in community-based settings over pre-implementation, implementation and sustainability phases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document