Semiquantification and Isotyping of Antidrug Antibodies by Immunocapture-LC/MS for Immunogenicity Assessment

Author(s):  
Jianing Zeng ◽  
Hao Jiang ◽  
Linlin Luo
2016 ◽  
Vol 435 ◽  
pp. 68-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy K. Schneider ◽  
Inna Vainshtein ◽  
Lorin K. Roskos ◽  
Carlos Chavez ◽  
Bo Sun ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Jung Kim ◽  
Eun Mi Koh ◽  
Chi Hun Song ◽  
Mi Sun Byun ◽  
Yu Ri Choi ◽  
...  

AbstractHuman granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, this study used Fc-fused recombinant G-CSF; GX-G3) is an important glycoprotein that stimulates the proliferation of granulocytes and white blood cells. Thus, G-CSF treatment has been considered as a crucial regimen to accelerate recovery from chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in cancer patients suffering from non-myeloid malignancy or acute myeloid leukemia. Despite the therapeutic advantages of G-CSF treatment, an assessment of its immunogenicity must be performed to determine whether the production of anti-G-CSF antibodies causes immune-related disorders. We optimized and validated analytical tools by adopting validation parameters for immunogenicity assessment. Using these validated tools, we analyzed serum samples from rats and monkeys injected subcutaneously with GX-G3 (1, 3 or 10 mg/kg once a week for 4 weeks followed by a 4-week recovery period) to determine immunogenicity response and toxicokinetic parameters with serum concentration of GX-G3. Several rats and monkeys were determined to be positive for anti-GX-G3 antibodies. Moreover, the immunogenicity response of GX-G3 was lower in monkeys than in rats, which was relevant to show less inhibition of toxicokinetic profiles in monkeys, at least 1 mg/kg administrated group, compared to rats. These results suggested the establishment and validation for analyzing anti-GX-G3 antibodies and measurement of serum levels of GX-G3 and anti-GX-G3 antibodies, which was related with toxicokinetic profiles. Taken together, this study provides immunogenicity assessment which is closely implicated with toxicokinetic study of GX-G3 in 4-week repeated administrated toxicological studies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 731.2-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rodríguez-Muguruza ◽  
B. Quirant ◽  
A. Teniente ◽  
J. Sanint ◽  
A. Prior-Español ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 511-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wetter ◽  
Michael Kowarik ◽  
Michael Steffen ◽  
Paula Carranza ◽  
Giampietro Corradin ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Pandher ◽  
M. W. Leach ◽  
L. A. Burns-Naas

A recovery phase—a nondosing period that follows the main dosing phase of a study—is sometimes included in nonclinical toxicity studies, and it is designed to understand whether toxicities observed at the end of the dosing phase are partially or completely reversible. For biopharmaceuticals with long half-lives, the inclusion of recovery arms can be helpful in understanding effects of prolonged exposure and assessing antidrug antibodies. This commentary discusses when to include recovery groups in nonclinical toxicity studies, the number of recovery groups to include in a given study, the number of animals to include in each recovery group, and the duration of the recovery phase. In general, the inclusion of recovery arms should follow a case-by-case approach that values rational scientific design and reflects the development needs and regulatory requirements applicable to individual nonclinical programs to ensure appropriate guidance for human studies while minimizing laboratory animal use.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. E733-E742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronit Mazor ◽  
Emily M. King ◽  
Masanori Onda ◽  
Nicolas Cuburu ◽  
Selamawit Addissie ◽  
...  

Protein-based drugs are very active in treating cancer, but their efficacy can be limited by the formation of neutralizing antidrug antibodies (ADAs). Recombinant immunotoxins are proteins that are very effective in patients with leukemia, where immunity is suppressed, but induce ADAs, which compromise their activity, in patients with intact immunity. Here we induced a specific, durable, and transferable immune tolerance to recombinant immunotoxins by combining them with nanoparticles containing rapamycin (SVP-R). SVP-R mitigated the formation of inhibitory ADAs in naïve and sensitized mice, resulting in restoration of antitumor activity. The immune tolerance is mediated by colocalization of the SVP-R and immunotoxin to dendritic cells and macrophages in the spleen and is abrogated by depletion of regulatory T cells. Tolerance induced by SVPs was not blocked by checkpoint inhibitors or costimulatory agonist monoclonal antibodies that by themselves enhance ADA formation.


Bioanalysis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiyu Shen ◽  
Tianjiao Dai

Background: Currently, screening cut point (CP) calculated from an assay validation with replicates are applied to an immunogenicity study with nonreplicates, for which the antidrug antibodies rate is determined. IID treats the replicate of a sample as coming from another independent sample. AVE uses average results from each sample across runs but inter-assay variability is reduced. Therefore, we propose a random effect model (REM) for calculating CP. Materials & method: We investigate impact of noncompatibility design between validation and immunogenicity studies on CP and compare these methods. Conclusion: IID may not fit for use when replicates’ variability dominates all sources of uncertainty. REM considers covariance structure of repeated measurements. CP by REM is smaller than that by IID but larger than that by AVE.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document