An Evaluation Method of Optimal Cost Saving in a Data Center with Proactive Management

2021 ◽  
pp. 105-127
Author(s):  
Ruben Milocco ◽  
Pascale Minet ◽  
Éric Renault ◽  
Selma Boumerdassi
2014 ◽  
Vol 556-562 ◽  
pp. 2810-2815
Author(s):  
Zhi Xiang Yuan ◽  
Shuang Bo Lai ◽  
Ming Liu ◽  
Hui Yi Zhang

Traditional datacenter temperature monitoring method is to install some temperature sensors which are unable to cover all areas completely, so there are some problems about local hot spot. The method is aiming to find out the position of potential hazard which may exist in the data center on the basis of data center thermal environment evaluation method and characteristics of air distribution. By applying this method into the wireless sensor network monitoring system, it brings a meaningful improvement of the monitoring system.


2013 ◽  
Vol 397-400 ◽  
pp. 1681-1684
Author(s):  
Chang Geng Yu ◽  
Gui Xiong Liu

Evaluation of equipment comfort is the premise to ensure the equipment operating normally and the computer room energy-saving. Based on fuzzy logic, We present a equipment comfort evaluation method model FDEC which gives a mathematical description and a way to implementation and the scientific evaluation in Data center, equipment comfort is analyzed for three different perspectives: temperature, humidity and ventilation in the room. Evaluation of equipment comfort problem solving algorithm is designed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1527-1541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Milocco ◽  
Pascale Minet ◽  
Eric Renault ◽  
Selma Boumerdassi

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 1255-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Song ◽  
X. Zhang ◽  
C. Eriksson
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
T. Oikawa ◽  
H. Kosugi ◽  
F. Hosokawa ◽  
D. Shindo ◽  
M. Kersker

Evaluation of the resolution of the Imaging Plate (IP) has been attempted by some methods. An evaluation method for IP resolution, which is not influenced by hard X-rays at higher accelerating voltages, was proposed previously by the present authors. This method, however, requires truoblesome experimental preperations partly because specially synthesized hematite was used as a specimen, and partly because a special shape of the specimen was used as a standard image. In this paper, a convenient evaluation method which is not infuenced by the specimen shape and image direction, is newly proposed. In this method, phase contrast images of thin amorphous film are used.Several diffraction rings are obtained by the Fourier transformation of a phase contrast image of thin amorphous film, taken at a large under focus. The rings show the spatial-frequency spectrum corresponding to the phase contrast transfer function (PCTF). The envelope function is obtained by connecting the peak intensities of the rings. The evelope function is offten used for evaluation of the instrument, because the function shows the performance of the electron microscope (EM).


2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4, 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract To account for the effects of multiple impairments, evaluating physicians must provide a summary value that combines multiple impairments so the whole person impairment is equal to or less than the sum of all the individual impairment values. A common error is to add values that should be combined and typically results in an inflated rating. The Combined Values Chart in the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, Fifth Edition, includes instructions that guide physicians about combining impairment ratings. For example, impairment values within a region generally are combined and converted to a whole person permanent impairment before combination with the results from other regions (exceptions include certain impairments of the spine and extremities). When they combine three or more values, physicians should select and combine the two lowest values; this value is combined with the third value to yield the total value. Upper extremity impairment ratings are combined based on the principle that a second and each succeeding impairment applies not to the whole unit (eg, whole finger) but only to the part that remains (eg, proximal phalanx). Physicians who combine lower extremity impairments usually use only one evaluation method, but, if more than one method is used, the physician should use the Combined Values Chart.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document