Atrial Flutter and Atrial Tachycardia

2022 ◽  
pp. 319-328
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tevfik Karagöz ◽  
İlker Ertuğrul ◽  
Ebru Aypar ◽  
Aydın Adıgüzel ◽  
Hayrettin Hakan Aykan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Accessory pathways are commonly seen due to delamination of tricuspid valve leaflets. In addition to accessory pathways, an enlarged right atrium due to tricuspid regurgitation and incisional scars creates substrates for atrial re-entries and ectopic tachycardia. We sought to describe our experience with catheter ablation in children with Ebstein’s anomaly. Methods and results: During the study period, of 89 patients diagnosed with Ebstein’s anomaly, 26 (30.9%) of them who underwent 33 ablation procedures were included in the study. Accessory pathways were observed in the majority of procedures (n = 27), whereas atrial flutter was observed in five, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in five, and atrial tachycardia in two procedures. Accessory pathways were commonly localised in the right posteroseptal (n = 10 patients), right posterolateral (n = 14 patients), septal (n = two patients), and left posteroseptal (n = one patient) areas. Multiple accessory pathways and coexistent arrhythmia were observed in six procedures. All ablation attempts related to the accessory pathways were successful, but recurrence was observed in five (19%) of the ablations. Ablation for atrial flutter was performed in five patients; two of them were ablated successfully. One of the atrial tachycardia cases was ablated successfully. Conclusions: Ablation in patients with Ebstein’s anomaly is challenging, and due to nature of the disease, it is not a rare occasion in this group of patients. Ablation of accessory pathways has high success, but also relatively high recurrence rates, whereas ablation of atrial arrhythmias has lower success rates, especially in operated patients.


Author(s):  
Chen Chun-hui

A 63-year-old female patient with a history of pulmonary heart disease underwent radiofrequency ablation because ofa persistent atrial flutter. Endocardial mapping with the carto3 system confirmed atrial flutter counterclockwise reentryaround the tricuspid annulus. Routine ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus line to bi-directional block was performed.However, tachycardia with the same cycle length was induced again. After remapping, the tachycardia was confirmedto be focal atrial tachycardia located in the crista terminalis. After ablation, the tachycardia was terminated and couldnot be induced again.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2075-2082
Author(s):  
Jose L. Merino

Macroreentrant atrial tachycardia is, after atrial fibrillation, the most common sustained form of supraventricular tachycardia. It is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Originally, atrial flutter was the most used term but has been discouraged in favour of the most generally applied macroreentrant atrial tachycardia and the definition and diagnosis changed from an electrocardiogram-based to an electrophysiological one after invasive evaluation. The most common type of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia is cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter. The reentrant circuit of CTI-atrial flutter revolves around the tricuspid annulus in the counterclockwise or the less common clockwise direction. The treatment of choice for most presentations of CTI-dependent flutter is catheter ablation by linear radiofrequency application of the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava. Different reentrant circuits of non-CTI-dependent macroreentrant atrial tachycardia have been reported in both the right and the left atrium. They are often associated with different structural heart diseases.


2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachiko Ito ◽  
Hiroshi Tada ◽  
Akihiko Nogami ◽  
Shigeto Naito ◽  
Shigeru Oshima ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document