Lupus Anticoagulants, Antiphospholipid Antibodies, and Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Background: Patients positive for three types of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) (triple positivity) have been identified at a high risk for thrombotic events. However, the clinical significance of isolated lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity is debated. Objectives: To investigate the clinical relevance of isolated LAC. Patients/Methods 456 patients were enrolled in this study; 66 antiphospholipid syndrome patients and 390 control patients. The control group existed of autoimmune patients (n=91), patients with thrombosis but without aPLs (n=127) and normal controls (n=172). The criteria LAC, anti-cardiolipin (anti-CL) and anti-beta2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) IgG and IgM and the non-criteria IgA anti-CL and anti-β2GPI, anti-domain I (anti-DI) of β2GPI IgG and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT) IgG and IgM were detected according to the ISTH guidelines for solid phase assays. Results: 70 patients were positive for LAC, of which 44 were negative for both anti-β2GPI and anti-CL. We found that isolated LAC proved to be strongly associated with vascular thrombosis (Odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 7.3 (3.3-16.1)), even better than triple positive samples (OR 4.3 (1.6-12.2)). The titers of the anti-PS/PT IgG and IgM were significantly higher in triple positivity samples compared to samples with isolated LAC positivity. The majority of single LAC positives were anti-PS/PT negative. We observed that LAC positivity was weaker in isolated LAC positive patients compared to LAC activity in triple positive patients. Conclusions: Isolated LAC was highly associated with thrombosis. The presence of anti-PS/PT could not explain LAC positivity in isolated LAC. Isolated LAC showed a weaker LAC activity compared to triple positive patients.

Download Full-text

POS0712 “EXTRA”- CRITERIA ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES IN PATIENTS WITH ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME AND SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (PRELIMINARY DATA)

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.818 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 605.2-606

Author(s):

F. Cheldieva ◽

T. Reshetnyak ◽

M. Cherkasova ◽

N. Seredavkina ◽

A. Lila

Keyword(s):

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Preliminary Data ◽

Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽

Disease Duration ◽

Past History ◽

Igg Antibodies ◽

Systemic Lupus ◽

Pregnancy Morbidity

Background:The study of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), not included in the Sydney diagnostic criteria, in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is poorly understood.Objectives:To determine the frequency of detection of IgA-aCL and IgA-aβ2GP1 and IgG antibodies to β2GP1 domain 1 (IgG-aβ2GP1-D1) in patients with APS with and without SLE.Methods:ELISA and chemiluminescence assays (CMA) were used to test 63 sera of patients: 22 (35%) with primary APS (pAPS) and 41 (65%) patients with APS and with SLE (secondary APS (sAPS)), with mean age 38,0 [33,0 – 43,0] years and disease duration 4,0 [0,1 – 9,9]. Both methods were used to test of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aβ2GP1. CMA was used for research IgG/IgM/IgA-aCL, IgG/IgM/IgA-aβ2GPI and IgG-aβ2GP1-D1. Of them 49 (78%) (18 – with pAPS; 31 – with sAPS) displayed major thrombotic events and 18 of 22 pregnant women had pregnancy morbidity in past history. Lupus anticoagulant (LA) positivity was in 9 out of 12 patients who had it determined. LA was not investigated due to anticoagulant therapy in the remaining 52 patients.Results:IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM-aß2GP1 were recorded in 44/18 and 50/17 patients by ELISA and in 55/19 and 59/16 by CMA, respectively.IgA-aCL positivity was found in 35 (56%) of 63 patients. Thirty IgA-positive patients were positive for IgG-aCL by ELISA: 22 – IgG-aCL – highly positive, 6 – medium positive and 2 – low positive patients. IgM-aCL by ELISA was detected in 13 (37%) of 35 IgA-aCL positive patients: 11 – highly positive, 1 – medium positive and 1 – low positive. IgA-aCL was combined with IgG-aCL in 34 patients and with IgM-aCL in 16 patients in the CMA. IgG-aß2GP1 in ELISA was detected in 32 patients with IgA-aCL (24 –highly positive, 5 – medium positive and 3 – low positive) and in 34 – in CMA. IgM-aß2GP1 was combined with IgA-aß2GP1 with the same frequency in both methods (in 13 patients).IgA-aß2GP1 was detected in 30 (48%) of 63 patients. They were combined with both IgG-aCL and IgG-aß2GP1 in all cases in both methods. IgM-aCL and IgM-aß2GP1 were detected in 14 and 11 of 30 patients with IgA-aß2GP1, respectively. The combination of IgA-aß2GP1 with IgG-aCL by ELISA was in 27 (in most cases highly positive – 20) and with IgM-aCL – in 10 (highly positive - 8). IgG-aß2GP1 was detected in 28 patients with IgA-aß2GP1 (high positive – 21) and in 11 patients with IgM-aß2GP1 (high positive –7).IgG-aß2GP1-D1 was revealed in 48 (76%) patients. It was combined with IgG-aCL – in 38, with IgM-aCL – in 15 patients by the ELISA. The combination of IgG-aß2GP1-D1 by CMA was as follows: with IgG-aCL – in 46, with IgM-aCL – in 17, and with IgA-aCL – in 33 patients. In most cases, IgG-aß2gp1-D1 was combined with highly positive aCL levels. IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was associated with IgG-aß2GP1 positivity in 42 – by ELISA and 47 – by CMA, IgМ-aβ2GP1 – in 13 and 14 patients by ELISA and CMA, respectively, and IgA-aß2GP1 – in 29. Isolated IgG-aß2GP1-D1 positivity was not observed.Conclusion:The frequency of IgA-aCL detection was 56% (35 patients out of 63), IgA-aβ2GP1 – 48% (30 patients out of 63), IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 – 76% (48 patients out of 63). There was not isolated positivity of this “extra” criterial antibodies. The presence of IgA-aCL, IgA-aβ2GP1, IgG-aβ2GP1-D1 was associated with highly positivity of IgG/IgM-aCL and IgG/IgM- aβ2GP1.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

Erratum to 16th international congress on antiphospholipid antibodies task force report on antiphospholipid syndrome treatment trends

Lupus ◽

10.1177/0961203320985066 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 096120332098506

Keyword(s):

Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽

Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽

Task Force ◽

International Congress ◽

Task Force Report ◽

Treatment Trends

Download Full-text

Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of antiphospholipid syndrome and ocular manifestations

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection ◽

10.1186/s12348-021-00240-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Gunay Uludag ◽

Neil Onghanseng ◽

Anh N. T. Tran ◽

Muhammad Hassan ◽

Muhammad Sohail Halim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽

Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽

Clinical Manifestations ◽

Autoimmune Disorder ◽

Ocular Involvement ◽

Ocular Manifestations ◽

Different Types ◽

Thrombotic Complications ◽

Specific Factors ◽

Arteries And Veins

AbstractAntiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder associated with obstetrical complications, thrombotic complications involving both arteries and veins, and non-thrombotic manifestations affecting multiple other systems presenting in various clinical forms. Diagnosis requires the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. The exact pathogenesis of APS is not fully known. However, it has recently been shown that activation of different types of cells by antiphospholipid antibodies plays an important role in thrombosis formation. Ocular involvement is one of the important clinical manifestations of APS and can vary in presentations. Therefore, as an ophthalmologist, it is crucial to be familiar with the ocular findings of APS to prevent further complications that can develop. Furthermore, the ongoing identification of new and specific factors contributing to the pathogenesis of APS may provide new therapeutic options in the management of the disease in the future.

Download Full-text

Autoantibodies against the fibrinolytic receptor, annexin 2, in antiphospholipid syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2005-07-2636 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 107 (11) ◽

pp. 4375-4382 ◽

Cited By ~ 122

Author(s):

Gabriela Cesarman-Maus ◽

Nina P. Ríos-Luna ◽

Arunkumar B. Deora ◽

Bihui Huang ◽

Rosario Villa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endothelial Cells ◽

Cell Surface ◽

Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽

Lupus Erythematosus ◽

Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽

Cell Surface Receptor ◽

Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽

Target Antigen ◽

Healthy Individuals ◽

Annexin 2

AbstractThe association of thrombosis and gestational morbidity with antiphospholipid antibodies is termed antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Annexin 2 (A2) is a profibrinolytic endothelial cell surface receptor that binds plasminogen, its tissue activator (tPA), and β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI), the main antigen for antiphospholipid antibodies. Here, we evaluate A2 as a target antigen in APS. Serum samples from 434 individuals (206 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus without thrombosis, 62 with APS, 21 with nonautoimmune thrombosis, and 145 healthy individuals) were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunoblot for antiphospholipid and A2 antibodies. Anti-A2 antibodies (titer > 3 SDs) were significantly more prevalent in patients with APS (22.6%; venous, 17.5%; arterial, 34.3%; and mixed thrombosis, 40.4%) than in healthy individuals (2.1%, P < .001), patients with nonautoimmune thrombosis (0%, P = .017), or patients with lupus without thrombosis (6.3%, P < .001). Anti–A2 IgG enhanced the expression of tissue factor on endothelial cells (6.4-fold ± 0.13-fold SE), blocked A2-supported plasmin generation in a tPAdependent generation assay (19%-71%) independently of β2GPI, and inhibited cell surface plasmin generation on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by 34% to 83%. We propose that anti-A2 antibodies contribute to the prothrombotic diathesis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Download Full-text