Ethical Environment and Scientific Rationale Towards In-Vitro Alternatives to Animal Testing: Where Are We Going?

2006 ◽  
pp. 251-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horst Spielmann
Impact ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (8) ◽  
pp. 44-45
Author(s):  
Hajime Kojima

Scientists are working to develop new and innovative alternatives to animal testing that don't rely on the use of animals. Takao Ashikaga, Hajime Kojima and Yoko Hirabayashi are part of JaCVAM which works to promote the use of alternatives to animal testing. The goal is to replace, reduce or refine (3Rs) the use of animal under International harmonization. Hirabayashi is also the representative of a research group that is funded by the AMED and the representative of a research group funded by the MHLW. A challenge the researchers are facing in their quest to ensure the welfare of experimental animals and also ensure the safety of various pharmaceutical and chemicals is the lack of biomarkers to more accurately predict toxicity for regulatory acceptance. This means that without animal testing more costly and complex non-animal methods are required and presents a barrier to the adoption of non-animal methods for international standerisation. As such, there is a need to develop an easy way to obtain a lot of information. Hirabayashi and the team are working on the development of AI that can be used to evaluate the safety of different compounds. The researchers are developing in vitro assays such as ordinary 2-dimensional culture, 3-dimensional culture including organoids or spheroids, reporter gene assay and organ-on-a chip; and in silico assays such as computer toxicology using QSAR and Read Across. The researchers hope that their innovative work will contribute to the 3Rs, benefiting animal welfare for regulatory use.


2019 ◽  
pp. 447-457
Author(s):  
Dayane Pifer Luco ◽  
Vânia Rodrigues Leite-Silva ◽  
Heather A.E. Benson ◽  
Patricia Santos Lopes

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-74
Author(s):  
Christina Grindon ◽  
Robert Combes ◽  
Mark T.D. Cronin ◽  
David W. Roberts ◽  
John F. Garrod

Liverpool John Moores University and FRAME recently conducted a research project, sponsored by Defra, on the status of alternatives to animal testing with regard to the European Union REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals) system for the safety testing and risk assessment of chemicals. The project covered all the main toxicity endpoints associated with the REACH system. This report focuses on how to maximise the use of alternative methods (both in vitro and in silico) for skin corrosion and irritation testing within a tiered testing strategy. It considers the latest developments in in vitro testing, with particular reference to the reconstituted skin models which have now been now been successfully validated and independently endorsed as suitable for both skin corrosivity and irritancy testing within the EU.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1297-1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jen-Yin Goh ◽  
Richard J. Weaver ◽  
Libby Dixon ◽  
Nicola J. Platt ◽  
Ruth A. Roberts

An analysis of the use ofin vitrotechniques in preclinical safety testing revealed a marked increase to >180 000 tests/year by 2012. Step changes in uptake were notable in the three main areas of ADME, safety pharmacology and genetic toxicology, correlated with relevant ICH guidelines.


2013 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. S151
Author(s):  
Barae Jomaa ◽  
Jac M.M.J.G. Aarts ◽  
Laura H.J. de Haan ◽  
Ad A.C.M. Peijinenburg ◽  
Toine F.H. Bovee ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-480
Author(s):  
Krys Bottrill

Recent developments in biomarkers relating to the interrelationship of diet, disease and health were surveyed. Most emphasis was placed on biomarkers of deleterious effects, since these are of greatest relevance to the subject of this review. The area of greatest activity was found to be that relating to biomarkers of mutagenic, genotoxic and carcinogenic effects. This is also one of the major areas of concern in considerations of the beneficial and deleterious effects of dietary components, and also the area in which regulatory testing requires studies of the longest duration. A degree of progress has also been made in the identification and development of biomarkers relating to certain classes of target organ toxicity. Biomarkers for other types of toxicity, such as immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity, are less developed, and further investigation in these areas is required before a comprehensive biomarker strategy can be established. A criticism that recurs constantly in the biomarker literature is the lack of standardisation in the methods used, and the lack of reference standards for the purposes of validation and quality control. It is encouraging to note the growing acknowledgement of the need for validation of biomarkers and biomarker assays. Some validation studies have already been initiated. This review puts forward proposals for criteria to be used in biomarker validation. More discussion on this subject is required. It is concluded that the use of biomarkers can, in some cases, facilitate the implementation of the Three Rs with respect to the testing of food chemicals and studies on the effects of diet on health. The greatest potential is seen to be in the refinement of animal testing, in which biomarkers could serve as early and sensitive endpoints, in order to reduce the duration of the studies and also reduce the number of animals required. Biomarkers could also contribute to establishing a mechanistic basis for in vitro test systems and to facilitating their validation and acceptance. Finally, the increased information that could result from the incorporation of biomarker determinations into population studies could reduce the need for supplementary animal studies. This review makes a number of recommendations concerning the prioritisation of future activities on dietary biomarkers in relation to the Three Rs. It is emphasised, however, that further discussions will be required among toxicologists, epidemiologists and others researching the relationship between diet and health.


1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 420-434
Author(s):  
Coenraad F.M. Hendriksen ◽  
Bernward Garthoff ◽  
Henrik Aggerbeck ◽  
Lucas Bruckner ◽  
Peter Castle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document