Sanger sequencing (Sanger method, enzymatic method, dideoxy method, dideoxy sequencing, chain terminator method, chain terminator sequencing procedure, enzymatic DNA sequencing, dideoxy mediated chain termination technique)

Author(s):  
Ayobami Adesiyan ◽  
Ayomikun Kade ◽  
Kafayat Oladimeji ◽  
Kehinde Sowunmi

DNA sequencing methods were first developed more than 20 years ago with the publication of two approaches to sequencing methodology that became known as Sanger sequencing (1), based on enzymatic synthesis from a single-stranded DNA template with chain termination using dideoxynucleotides (ddNTPs) and Maxim-Gilbert sequencing (2),which involved chemical degradation ofend-radio-labeled DNA fragments. Both methods relied on four-lane,high resolution polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to separate the labeled fragment and allow the base sequence to be read in a staggered ladder-like fashion. Sanger sequencing was technically easier and faster, and thus became the main DNA sequencing method for the vast majority of applications.


DNA Sequence ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Jensen ◽  
Robert J. Zagursky ◽  
George L. Trainor ◽  
Anthony J. Cocuzza ◽  
Angela Lee ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John Archibald

For all its biological importance, DNA is a fragile molecule so extracting it is a difficult process. ‘How to read the book of life’ explains the techniques required to sequence DNA. It begins by explaining the techniques developed for protein and RNA sequencing by Frederick Sanger, Robert Holley, and Carl Woese that were then developed further for DNA sequencing. Following the success of the Human Genome Project, the next generation of DNA sequencing was developed in the mid-2000s. Pyrosequencing was capable of generating orders of magnitude more data at a fraction of the cost, but was superceded within a decade by semiconductor sequencing, reversible chain-termination sequencing, and single-molecule sequencing.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8596-8596
Author(s):  
Kevin Z. Qu ◽  
Qiulu Pan ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Luis Rodriguez ◽  
Jennifer Uyeji ◽  
...  

8596 Background: Detection of BRAF V600 mutations is currently a prerequisite for approved use of vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. The cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics), a PCR-based assay approved to aid in selecting patients for vemurafenib therapy, primarily detects V600E. It is also reported to detect V600K, which has been associated with vemurafenib response as well. We compared the mutation detection rate of the cobas assay with that of Sanger sequencing. Methods: 125 de-identified FFPE tissues submitted for BRAF mutation analysis that all showed histologically-confirmed melanoma were tested. BRAF mutations were detected using both the cobas kit and bidirectional Sanger sequencing using BigDye kits (Applied Biosystems). DNA was extracted from 5-um sections without macrodissection using the cobas DNA extraction kit (for the cobas test) or from 5-10-um sections using Agencourt extraction kits (Beckman Coulter) following macrodissection. Results: The two methods showed agreement in 104/125 (83.2%) of cases (Table). Sanger sequencing detected V600 dinucleotide mutations in 9 samples that were negative by the cobas assay. Sanger sequencing produced no results in 10 cases owing to suboptimal PCR, including 2 that were positive by the cobas assay. The cobas assay produced 2 invalid results, including 1 that was positive for V600E by Sanger.The cobas assay detected 7/11 V600K mutations. Conclusions: Overall agreement between cobas and Sanger sequencing was 83.2%. The Sanger method had higher analytic sensitivity, resulting in nine additional V600 mutations not called by cobas compared to the two seen by cobas but not Sanger sequencing. Thus, 16% (9/57) more patients would be identified as candidates for vemurafenib therapy using the Sanger method. [Table: see text]


1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Bellemare ◽  
Claude Potvin ◽  
Claire Simard

A strategy has been developed allowing the use of a single preparation of single-stranded DNA clones for chemical DNA sequencing in the opposite direction to the classical dideoxy chain termination method. Oligonucleotide complementary to the 5′-end of the multipurpose cloning sequence, with the proper restriction enzyme, is used to cleave specifically the molecules to expose a unique 5′-end, upstream to the inserted DNA, for the kinase labeling reaction. No further treatments are necessary before Maxam–Gilbert chemical sequencing reactions.


2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilian T. C. França ◽  
Emanuel Carrilho ◽  
Tarso B. L. Kist

1. Summary 1692. Introduction 1703. Sanger's method and other enzymic methods 1703.1 Random approach 1713.2 Direct approach 1713.3 Enzyme technology 1753.4 Sample preparation 1753.5 Labels and DNA labelling 1763.5.1 Radioisotopes 1763.5.2 Chemiluminescent detection 1763.5.3 Fluorescent dyes 1773.6 Fragment separation and analysis 1803.6.1 Electrophoresis 1803.6.2 Mass spectrometry – an alternative 1824. Maxam & Gilbert and other chemical methods 1835. Pyrosequencing – DNA sequencing in real time by the detection of released PPi 1876. Single molecule sequencing with exonuclease 1907. Conclusion 1928. Acknowledgements 1929. References 193The four best known DNA sequencing techniques are reviewed. Important practical issues covered are read-length, speed, accuracy, throughput, cost, as well as the automation of sample handling and preparation. The methods reviewed are: (i) the Sanger method and its most important variants (enzymic methods); (ii) the Maxam & Gilbert method and other chemical methods; (iii) the PyrosequencingTM method – DNA sequencing in real time by the detection of released pyrophosphate (PPi); and (iv) single molecule sequencing with exonuclease (exonuclease digestion of a single molecule composed of a single strand of fluorescently labelled deoxynucleotides). Each method is briefly described, the current literature is covered, advantages, disadvantages, and the most suitable applications of each method are discussed.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5042-5042
Author(s):  
Patricia Severino ◽  
Liliane Santana Oliveira ◽  
Natalia Torres ◽  
Joao Carlos Guerra ◽  
Nelson Hamerschlak ◽  
...  

Abstract Hemophilia A, B, and von Willebrand disease correspond to more than 90% of all inherited bleeding disorders associated with coagulation factor deficiencies. Symptoms between these deficiencies may vary greatly and yet are often phenotypically similar. Bleeding episodes can range from mild to severe, at times with life threatening hemorrhages. Currently, biochemical assays are performed to assess the function of each coagulation factor, but diagnosis remains cumbersome and prone to multiple sources of variability between laboratories. Genetic evaluation allows for the examination of multiple coagulation factor genes simultaneously and may quickly identify possible causes to the disease. Additionally, genetic testing should be more reproducible and readily comparable between clinical laboratories. In this work we evaluate the potential use of targeted sequencing of three coagulation factors genes – F8, F9 and VWF – for the concurrent diagnosis and characterization of hemophilia A, B, and von Willebrand disease samples. For targeted DNA sequencing we selected specific DNA probes using genomic coordinates spanning the complete intronic and exonic regions of the three genes, as well as flanking gene sequences. Eleven hemophilia A samples and four hemophilia B samples, clinically characterized and submitted to Sanger sequencing for F8 and F9 genes coding regions, respectively, were included in this study. Our results indicate that even though DNA quality may be ideal for traditional DNA sequencing, enrichment techniques require more intact fragments, as reflected by variations in sequencing coverage between samples: quadruplicate results per sample showed 100X coverage varying from 80% of sequenced regions to less then 20%. Point substitutions found in F9 genes by Sanger sequencing were confirmed by targeted sequencing, but results for F8 gene were less satisfactory, in agreement with probe design limitations at this point. Of interest for hemophilia A patients, four samples possessed, in addition to the alterations in F8, point mutations in VWF. Probe design and sequencing parameters did not allow for the identification of F8 intron 1 and intron 22 inversions, frequent alterations in hemophilia A, but optimization procedures are currently underway. We conclude that targeted sequencing approach may be a viable and more complete solution for the diagnosis and management of hemophilia A, B and von Willebrand disease. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document