scholarly journals Automated treatment planning of prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy with focal boosting on a fast‐rotating O‐ring linac: Plan quality comparison with C‐arm linacs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin De Roover ◽  
Wouter Crijns ◽  
Kenneth Poels ◽  
Bertrand Dewit ◽  
Cédric Draulans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Fast Rotating

scholarly journals Multicriterial CNN based beam generation for robotic radiosurgery of the prostate

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gerlach ◽  
Christoph Fürweger ◽  
Theresa Hofmann ◽  
Alexander Schlaefer
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Beam Generation ◽  
Radiological Features ◽  
Improve Treatment ◽  
Robotic Radiosurgery ◽  
Treatment Plans

AbstractAlthough robotic radiosurgery offers a flexible arrangement of treatment beams, generating treatment plans is computationally challenging and a time consuming process for the planner. Furthermore, different clinical goals have to be considered during planning and generally different sets of beams correspond to different clinical goals. Typically, candidate beams sampled from a randomized heuristic form the basis for treatment planning. We propose a new approach to generate candidate beams based on deep learning using radiological features as well as the desired constraints. We demonstrate that candidate beams generated for specific clinical goals can improve treatment plan quality. Furthermore, we compare two approaches to include information about constraints in the prediction. Our results show that CNN generated beams can improve treatment plan quality for different clinical goals, increasing coverage from 91.2 to 96.8% for 3,000 candidate beams on average. When including the clinical goal in the training, coverage is improved by 1.1% points.

Treatment plan quality and delivery accuracy assessments on 3 IMRT delivery methods of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Huang ◽  
Toufik Djemil ◽  
Tingliang Zhuang ◽  
Martin Andrews ◽  
Samuel T. Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Delivery Methods ◽  
Spine Tumors ◽  
Delivery Accuracy ◽  
Accuracy Assessments

scholarly journals MR-Linac Radiotherapy – The Beam Angle Selection Problem

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rik Bijman ◽  
Linda Rossi ◽  
Tomas Janssen ◽  
Peter de Ruiter ◽  
Baukelien van Triest ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Systematic Research ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Beam Angle ◽  
Clinical Workflow ◽  
Model Case ◽  
Angle Class

BackgroundWith the large-scale introduction of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), selection of optimal beam angles for coplanar static-beam IMRT has increasingly become obsolete. Due to unavailability of VMAT in current MR-linacs, the problem has re-gained importance. An application for automated IMRT treatment planning with integrated, patient-specific computer-optimization of beam angles (BAO) was used to systematically investigate computer-aided generation of beam angle class solutions (CS) for replacement of computationally expensive patient-specific BAO. Rectal cancer was used as a model case.Materials and Methods23 patients treated at a Unity MR-linac were included. BAOx plans (x=7-12 beams) were generated for all patients. Analyses of BAO12 plans resulted in CSx class solutions. BAOx plans, CSx plans, and plans with equi-angular setups (EQUIx, x=9-56) were mutually compared.ResultsFor x>7, plan quality for CSx and BAOx was highly similar, while both were superior to EQUIx. E.g. with CS9, bowel/bladder Dmean reduced by 22% [11%, 38%] compared to EQUI9 (p<0.001). For equal plan quality, the number of EQUI beams had to be doubled compared to BAO and CS.ConclusionsComputer-generated beam angle CS could replace individualized BAO without loss in plan quality, while reducing planning complexity and calculation times, and resulting in a simpler clinical workflow. CS and BAO largely outperformed equi-angular treatment. With the developed CS, time consuming beam angle re-optimization in daily adaptive MR-linac treatment could be avoided. Further systematic research on computerized development of beam angle class solutions for MR-linac treatment planning is warranted.

Tree-based exploration of the optimization objectives for automatic cervical cancer IMRT treatment planning

2021 ◽  
pp. 20210214
Author(s):  
Hanlin Wang ◽  
Ruoxi Wang ◽  
Jiacheng Liu ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Kaining Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Femoral Head ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Automatic Treatment ◽  
Better Than

Objectives: To develop and evaluate a practical automatic treatment planning method for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in cervical cancer cases. Methods: A novel algorithm named as Optimization Objectives Tree Search Algorithm (OOTSA) was proposed to emulate the planning optimization process and achieve a progressively improving IMRT plan, based on the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI). Thirty previously treated cervical cancer cases were selected from the clinical database and comparison was made between the OOTSA-generated plans and clinical treated plans and RapidPlan-based (RP) plans. Results: In clinical evaluation, compared with plan scores of the clinical plans and the RP plans, 22 and 26 of the OOTSA plans were considered as clinically improved in terms of plan quality, respectively. The average conformity index (CI) for the PTV in the OOTSA plans was 0.86 ± 0.01 (mean ± 1 standard deviation), better than those in the RP plans (0.83 ± 0.02) and the clinical plans (0.71 ± 0.11). Compared with the clinical plans, the mean doses of femoral head, rectum, spinal cord and right kidney in the OOTSA plans were reduced by 2.34 ± 2.87 Gy, 1.67 ± 2.10 Gy, 4.12 ± 6.44 Gy and 1.15 ± 2.67 Gy. Compared with the RP plans, the mean doses of femoral head, spinal cord, right kidney and small intestine in the OOTSA plans were reduced by 3.31 ± 1.55 Gy, 4.25 ± 3.69 Gy, 1.54 ± 2.23 Gy and 3.33 ± 1.91 Gy, respectively. In the OOTSA plans, the mean dose of bladder was slightly increased, with 2.33 ± 2.55 Gy (versus clinical plans) and 1.37 ± 1.74 Gy (versus RP plans). The average elapsed time of OOTSA and clinical planning were 59.2 ± 3.47 min and 76.53 ± 5.19 min. Conclusions: The plans created by OOTSA have been shown marginally better than the manual plans, especially in preserving OARs. In addition, the time of automatic treatment planning has shown a reduction compared to a manual planning process, and the variation of plan quality was greatly reduced. Although improvement on the algorithm is warranted, this proof-of-concept study has demonstrated that the proposed approach can be a practical solution for automatic planning. Advances in knowledge: The proposed method is novel in the emulation strategy of the physicists’ iterative operation during the planning process. Based on the existing optimizers, this method can be a simple yet effective solution for automated IMRT treatment planning.

SU-GG-T-557: Single-Segment IMRT Treatment Planning for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6Part24) ◽  
pp. 3315-3315
Author(s):  
C Bloch ◽  
K Baker ◽  
J Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Single Segment

scholarly journals Benchmarking techniques for stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage glottic laryngeal cancer: LINAC-based non-coplanar VMAT vs. Cyberknife planning

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
You Zhang ◽  
Tsuicheng Chiu ◽  
Jeffrey Dubas ◽  
Zhen Tian ◽  
Pam Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Laryngeal Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Dose Calculation ◽  
Monte Carlo Algorithm ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Plan Quality ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was found effective in treating laryngeal cancer with only five treatment fractions by a recent clinical trial (NCT01984502, ClinicalTrials.gov). Nevertheless, this trial used the Cyberknife system, which is not widely accessible enough to benefit all patients affected by laryngeal cancer. Our study investigates the feasibility of larynx SBRT treatment planning on a conventional gantry-based LINAC and compares its plan quality with that from the Cyberknife. Materials & methods Ten larynx SBRT cases were originally treated by Cyberknife using fixed cones in our institution, with plans created and optimized using the Monte-Carlo algorithm in the MultiPlan treatment planning system. These cases were retrospectively planned in the Eclipse planning system for a LINAC with the same prescription dose. We used volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for larynx SBRT planning in Eclipse and incorporated non-coplanar arcs to approach the Cyberknife’s large solid angle delivery space. We used both anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm for dose calculation and compared their accuracy by measurements on an in-house larynx phantom. We compared the LINAC VMAT plans (VMAT-AAA and VMAT-AXB) with the original Cyberknife plans using dosimetric endpoints such as the conformity index, gradient indices (R50, R20), OAR maximum/mean doses, and the monitor units. Results Phantom measurement showed that both the AAA and the AXB algorithms provided adequate dose calculation accuracy (94.7% gamma pass rate on 2%/2 mm criteria for AAA vs. 97.3% for AXB), though AXB provided better accuracy in the air cavity. The LINAC-based VMAT plans achieved similar dosimetric endpoints as the Cyberknife planning, and all plans met the larynx SBRT dosimetric constraints. Cyberknife plans achieved an average conformity index of 1.13, compared to 1.20 of VMAT-AXB and 1.19 of VMAT-AAA. The VMAT plans spared the thyroid gland better with average Dmean of 2.4 Gy (VMAT-AXB) and 2.7 Gy (VMAT-AAA), as compared to 4.3 Gy for Cyberknife plans. The VMAT-AAA plans had a slightly lower contralateral arytenoid Dmax (average: 15.2 Gy) than Cyberknife plans (average: 17.9 Gy) with statistical significance, while the contralateral arytenoid Dmax was similar between VMAT-AXB and Cyberknife plans with no statistically significant difference. Cyberknife plans offered slightly better R50 (average: 5.0) than VMAT-AXB (5.9) and VMAT-AAA (5.7) plans. The VMAT plans substantially reduced the plan MUs to less than 1/3 of the Cyberknife plans, and the differences were statistically significant. The other metrics were similar between VMAT and Cyberknife plans with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions Gantry-based LINACs can achieve similar plan quality to Cyberknife systems. Treatment outcome with both methods remains to be investigated.

scholarly journals PO-0818: Improving plan quality and efficiency by automated rectum VMAT treatment planning

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S438 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Wortel ◽  
J. Trinks ◽  
D. Eekhout ◽  
P. De Ruiter ◽  
R. De Graaf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Plan Quality
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document