scholarly journals Quantitative amyloid PET in the AMYPAD diagnostic and patient management study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Buckley ◽  
Juan Domingo Gispert ◽  
Daniele Altomare ◽  
Christian Moro ◽  
Santiago Bullich ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Léa Poitrine ◽  
Daniele Altomare ◽  
Christian Moro ◽  
Lyduine Collij ◽  
Isadora Lopes Alves ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 154-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yejin Kim ◽  
Paul Rosenberg ◽  
Esther Oh

Background: Molecular imaging of brain amyloid for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) using positron emission tomography (PET) has been approved for use in clinical practice by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2012. However, the clinical utility and diagnostic impact of amyloid PET imaging remain controversial. We conducted a review of the recent studies investigating clinical utility of amyloid PET imaging with focus on changes in diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and patient management. Summary: A total of 16 studies were included in the final analysis. Overall rate of changes in diagnosis after amyloid PET ranged from 9 to 68% (pooled estimate of 31%, 95% CI 23–39%). All studies reported overall increase in diagnostic confidence or diagnostic certainty after amyloid PET. Changes in patient management ranged from 37 to 87%; the most common type of change in management reported was either the initiation or discontinuation of planned AD medications. Key Messages: Amyloid PET imaging led to moderate to significant changes in diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and subsequent patient management. It may be most useful in patients with high level of diagnostic uncertainty even after the completing the standard workup.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Altomare ◽  
Lyduine Collij ◽  
Valentina Garibotto ◽  
Léa Poitrine ◽  
Christian Moro ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 388-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni B. Frisoni ◽  
Frederik Barkhof ◽  
Daniele Altomare ◽  
Johannes Berkhof ◽  
Marina Boccardi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. P1474-P1475
Author(s):  
Arno de Wilde ◽  
Wiesje Pelkmans ◽  
Femke H. Bouwman ◽  
Jurre Verwer ◽  
Colin Groot ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. P1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gil D. Rabinovici ◽  
Constantine Gatsonis ◽  
Charles Apgar ◽  
Ilana F. Gareen ◽  
Lucy Hanna ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 129-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Pontecorvo ◽  
Andrew Siderowf ◽  
Bruno Dubois ◽  
P. Murali Doraiswamy ◽  
Giovanni B. Frisoni ◽  
...  

Aims: To evaluate the impact of amyloid PET imaging on diagnosis and patient management in a multicenter, randomized, controlled study. Methods: Physicians identified patients seeking a diagnosis for mild cognitive impairment or dementia, possibly due to Alzheimer disease (AD), and recorded a working diagnosis and a management plan. The patients underwent florbetapir PET scanning and were randomized to either immediate or delayed (1-year) feedback regarding amyloid status. At the 3-month visit, the physician updated the diagnosis and recorded a summary of the actual patient management since the post-scan visit. The study examined the impact of immediate versus delayed feedback on patient diagnosis/management at 3 and 12 months. Results: A total of 618 subjects were randomized (1:1) to immediate or delayed feedback arms, and 602 subjects completed the 3-month primary endpoint visit. A higher proportion of patients in the immediate feedback arm showed a change in diagnosis compared to the controls (32.6 vs. 6.4%; p = 0.0001). Similarly, a higher proportion of patients receiving immediate feedback had a change in management plan (68 vs. 55.5%; p < 0.002), mainly driven by changes in AD medication. Specifically, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors were prescribed to 67% of the amyloid-positive and 27% of the amyloid-negative subjects in the information group compared with 56 and 43%, respectively, in the control group (p < 0.0001). These between-group differences persisted until the 12-month visit. Conclusion: Knowledge of the amyloid status affects the diagnosis and alters patient management.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 673-678
Author(s):  
G. R. Fink ◽  
J. Kukolja

ZusammenfassungDemenzielle Erkrankungen spielen aufgrund des demografischen Wandels eine zunehmende Rolle in unserer Gesellschaft und somit auch im klinischen Alltag. Die Weiterentwicklung diagnostischer Methoden wie das Amyloid-PET und die Biomarkerbestimmung im Liquor hat eine Wende in der Klassifikation der Demenzen herbeigeführt. Es ist mittlerweile nicht nur möglich, die Alzheimer-Erkrankung als häufigste Ursache der Demenz schon in Frühstadien sicher zu erkennen. Auch einige klinisch atypische Demenzen zeigen die charakteristische Alzheimer-Pathologie und werden dementsprechend als Alzheimer-Varianten aufgefasst. Ein relevanter Anteil alzheimerähnlicher Demenzen beruht hingegen nicht auf einer alzheimerdefinierenden Amyloid-Pathologie.In diesem Übersichtsartikel werden die Folgen der modernen diagnostischen Methoden auf die Klassifikation der Demenzen, deren Prävention und Therapie diskutiert.


2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 758-760
Author(s):  
F Jessen

ZusammenfassungDie zerebrale Bildgebung hat in der ätiologischen Diagnostik von Demenzerkrankungen die Funktion z. B. chirurgisch behandelbare Ursachen einer Demenz aufzudecken. Zusätzlich trägt sie zur Differenzialdiagnose von primären Demenzerkrankungen bei. Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen sind durch typische Atrophiemuster gekennzeichnet. Vaskuläre Läsionen können sensitiv mit der MRT erfasst werden. Zahlreiche neue MRT-Verfahren befinden sich in der klinischen Entwicklung. Als nuklearmedizinisches Verfahren ist insbesondere die 18F-Fluordesoxyglukose (FDG)-PET wertvoll. Die zukünftige klinische Relevanz von Amyloid-PET wird mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit sehr hoch sein.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document