Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease: A Nationwide, Multicenter Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2100-2111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Tison ◽  
Gilles Quéré ◽  
Laurent Misery ◽  
Elisa Funck‐Brentano ◽  
François‐Xavier Danlos ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Swetha Alexander ◽  
Umang Swami ◽  
Aneet Kaur ◽  
Yubo Gao ◽  
Munazza Fatima ◽  
...  

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-539
Author(s):  
Chunlan Wu ◽  
Li Zhong ◽  
Qing Wu ◽  
Shaowei Lin ◽  
Xianhe Xie

Objective: This study aims at investigating the safety and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease (AID). Materials & methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The primary end points of the study were immunotoxicity and cancer response. Results: At the early use of ICIs, compared with those with active AID, grade 3–4 AID flare occurred more frequently in patients with inactive AID after treatment with ICIs; and the incidence of grade 3–4 immunotoxic effects was significantly lower in patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy than those without corresponding treatment. In addition, patients with worsening AID generally obtained a better objective response than those without a flare. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the toxic effects induced by immunotherapy are generally manageable in patients with cancer and pre-existing AID, some of whom even achieve satisfactory antitumor effects in clinical practice.


2018 ◽  
Vol 169 (2) ◽  
pp. 133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noha Abdel-Wahab ◽  
Mohsin Shah ◽  
Maria A. Lopez-Olivo ◽  
Maria E. Suarez-Almazor

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A655-A655
Author(s):  
Joyce Hwang ◽  
Hannah Dzimitrowicz ◽  
Riddhishkumar Shah ◽  
Kathleen Ashcraft ◽  
Daniel George ◽  
...  

BackgroundPatients with cancer are at high risk for severe COVID-19 disease and mortality1; however, patients on active cancer treatment, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), were excluded from COVID19 vaccine trials.2 3 Thus, safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in patients receiving ICIs is not well described.MethodsWe identified patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) or melanoma who received at least one dose of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine (vax+), with or without being on ICI, between the dates of December 1, 2020 and April 1, 2021, and had at least 3 months of documented follow up at Duke Cancer Center. Retrospective chart abstraction of patient encounters during three months following vaccination was performed. Patient characteristics included demographics and oncologic treatments. Primary outcome was adverse events attributed to vaccination; other outcomes included immune related adverse events (IRAE) following vaccination and subsequent COVID-19 infection.Results51 study patients (vax+ with ICI) and 23 control patients (vax+ not on active treatment) were initially identified. Baseline characteristics are in table 1. 27.5% of ICI patients (N = 14/51) reported symptoms attributed to vaccination. Common symptoms reported by the ICI group were fever (9.8%; N = 5), chills (7.8%; N = 4), arm pain (7.8%; N = 4), myalgias (7.8%; N = 4), lymphadenopathy (7.8%; N = 4), headache (5.9%; N = 3), and diarrhea (3.9%; N = 2). None of these were reported in the control group. One patient in the ICI group developed a rash at the injection site, and one developed porokeratoses following the second dose. From the control group, one patient developed a stye and one patient developed PVCs. Five ICI patients (9.8%) developed a new or worsening IRAE requiring systemic steroids and/or treatment hold. These IRAEs included: colitis (N = 2), hepatitis, rash, and concurrent pancreatitis/colitis. Two ICI patients (4%) and 0 patients developed COVID-19 infection after one and two vaccine doses, respectively.ConclusionsAmongst a heterogeneous population of patients receiving ICI therapy, COVID-19 vaccination appears to be well tolerated and safe. The higher rate of symptoms reported post-vaccination in patients receiving ICI therapy is likely related to more frequent follow up intervals versus control. The rate of new or worsening IRAEs post-vaccination is no higher than historically reported.4 5 An update of this data with a larger cohort will be presented. Larger cohort studies of patients receiving ICIs are needed to fully assess the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in this population; however, these data support the safety of vaccination in patients receiving ICIs.ReferencesKuderer NM, Choueiri TK, Shah DP, Shyr Y, Rubinstein SM, Rivera DR et al. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. The Lancet 2020;395:1907–1918.Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020;383(27):2603–15.Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N Engl J Med 2020.Xing P, Zhang F, Wang G, Xu Y, Li C, Wang S, et al. Incidence rates of immune-related adverse events and their correlation with response in advanced solid tumors treated with NIVO or NIVO+IPI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J ImmunoTherapy Cancer 2019;341.Osta B, Hu F, Sadek R, Chintalapally R, Tang S. A meta-analysis of immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors from cancer clinical trials. Submitted Abstracts Immunotherapy of Cancer 2016;27.Abstract 625 Table 1Baseline characteristics of ICI and control populations


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Zhao ◽  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Lingyi Xu ◽  
Huaxia Yang ◽  
Naixin Liang ◽  
...  

IntroductionLittle evidence exists on the safety and efficacy of the rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with cancer.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane for articles on ICI rechallenge after irAEs for systemic review and meta-analysis. The outcomes included the incidence and associated factors for safety and objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for efficacy.ResultsA total of 789 ICI rechallenge cases from 18 cohort studies, 5 case series studies, and 54 case reports were included. The pooled incidence of all-grade and high-grade irAEs after rechallenge in patients with cancer was 34.2% and 11.7%, respectively. Compared with initial ICI treatment, rechallenge showed a higher incidence for all-grade irAEs (OR, 3.81; 95% CI, 2.15–6.74; p < 0.0001), but similar incidence for high-grade irAEs (p > 0.05). Types of initial irAEs (pneumonitis and global irAEs) and cancer (non-small cell lung cancer and multiple cancer) recapitulated these findings. Gastrointestinal irAEs and time interval between initial irAEs and ICI rechallenge were associated with higher recurrence of high-grade irAEs (p < 0.05), whereas initial anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies were associated with a lower recurrence (p < 0.05). Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies rechallenge was associated with a lower all-grade irAE recurrence (p < 0.05). The pooled ORR and DCR after rechallenge were 43.1% and 71.9%, respectively, showing no significant difference compared with initial ICI treatment (p > 0.05).ConclusionsICI rechallenge after irAEs showed lower safety and similar efficacy outcomes compared with initial ICI treatment.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42020191405.


2018 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noha Abdel-Wahab ◽  
Mohsin Shah ◽  
Maria A. Lopez-Olivo ◽  
Maria E. Suarez-Almazor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document